tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post4913967604723265238..comments2024-03-28T23:54:49.006-07:00Comments on THE DAILY PEN: Did Hawaii "Cover-Up" Obama's Natal History?Penbrook Onehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-92055867280471733542011-03-29T15:48:48.494-07:002011-03-29T15:48:48.494-07:00You cite the following quote in your article with ...You cite the following quote in your article with no reference made as to who or what you are quoting. Please remedy that, thank you:<br /><br />"The difference between the synthetic endowment of natural-born status provided by the state of Hawaii as opposed to the federal Constitutional requirement is that the federal mandate requires the<br />candidate to actually be born under medical verification and federal legal jurisdictions. The birth of a natural born civilian must be documented with a standard NVSD "Certificate of Live Birth" and it must be signed by a licensed professional qualified to witness and attest to the legal and medical characteristics of a "live birth" at the moment of the birth, within the geographic region affording U.S. Constitutional protection for the witnesses and the child."Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11060694038455469968noreply@blogger.com