tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post2270406872985229051..comments2024-03-28T23:54:49.006-07:00Comments on THE DAILY PEN: VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL (PART 3)Penbrook Onehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-59713177423417995032019-07-02T14:23:43.646-07:002019-07-02T14:23:43.646-07:00Penbrook One: It has been 7 years and every Birthe...Penbrook One: It has been 7 years and every Birther lie that had been debunked remains solidly debunked. Reality Checkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-16082999324658535062013-02-08T02:29:56.800-08:002013-02-08T02:29:56.800-08:00The "certification of live birth" posted...The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. <br /><br /><a href="http://phlebotomytrainingpro.net/hawaii/" rel="nofollow">phlebotomy schools hawaii</a><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06106007750484567313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-69206101806308098582012-07-13T22:11:50.874-07:002012-07-13T22:11:50.874-07:00Great work Pen!!!Great work Pen!!!Mark Gillarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03408595901586175609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-23809953686975773402012-07-13T22:07:32.452-07:002012-07-13T22:07:32.452-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Mark Gillarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03408595901586175609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-77745016168658596022012-03-23T11:10:25.566-07:002012-03-23T11:10:25.566-07:00Mr. Johannson,
Have you considered releasing to t...Mr. Johannson,<br /><br />Have you considered releasing to the public, or sending to Sheriff Joe, a copy of your birth record from Brisbane Australia...along with a copy of the HI COLB you allege to have obtained?nbC1759https://www.blogger.com/profile/10483178803937749660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-42944281697636996552012-03-18T22:50:24.078-07:002012-03-18T22:50:24.078-07:00With regard to your wifes BC, there are two circum...With regard to your wifes BC, there are two circumstances which explain the allocation of your wife's possible intrastate allocation of the birth. Again, not knowing the specific circumstances of the birth (i.e. why the birth occurred in Ohio and not in the home state, the age of her mother, the residency of the father's household and the status of the relationship with your ex-mother in law and the laws governing birth data reporting in Ohio). <br /><br />First, Georgia is one of 14 states which developed the self-reporting data protocols in the 1950s and 1960s. The state of Ohio was not. The coordination of the two municipalities were therefore an issue with regard to intrastate residency and birth reporting. Also, the state of Georgia, in the 1950s and 1960s was one only a handful of states which had more than 100 counties (See 1961 VSIM). Therefore it required a unique data recording protocol in which it was assigned two separate double-digit codes for counties of birth data. The coding for counties in the U.S. evolved to 3 digits in 1970 after the decadal census. <br /><br />The fact that she was born in another state, and that her birth was allocated by intrastate residency status further supports our belief that, SINCE IT WAS NOT FOREIGN BIRTH, and the fact that Georgia's county assignments forced advanced data reporting protocols based on Census data, it is highly advantageous for Ohio and Georgia to record her birth by place of occurence and provide an exchange transcipt of residency for data reporting by the NCHS. Remember, birth statistics are primarily about money to municipal governments, not providing citizenship and identification. Those are collateral functions of birth records. <br /><br />Furthermore, and slightly off trail, the plausibility that Barack Obama is an illegitimate president causes a high level of psychological pain to those who supported his candidacy under the belief that he was who everyone thought he was because of what they were told by others about him. The fact that he is actually not a natural born citizen and, therefore, not an eligible candidate for the Presideny has distorted the truth that Obama is just as worthy of success and happiness and freedom and justice as anyone else in America. He just isn't qualified to hold one of a million jobs in government. This is not personal. Its just business.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-6768983306956744192012-03-18T22:19:16.084-07:002012-03-18T22:19:16.084-07:00Based on the entire body of historical documentati...Based on the entire body of historical documentation regarding allocation of vital events to place of residence, there is a strong indication that, unless foreign events are allocated to the individual "at risk" of the event (births and deaths to U.S. residents in this case) within the population to which they claim residence, they would not be recorded by the NCHS. The NCHS explicitly states that if a birth occurs in a foreign country to a U.S. citizen, and that birth is not allocated to the place of residence in the U.S., it was not recorded in the annual birth statistics reports. <br /><br />Therefore, three separate organizations hold influence in how these circumstances are reported in each state. Most importantly, the VSIM and the VSUS report both explicitly states that the rules used to report such an event are "arbitrary and controversial" in many states. The World Health Organization, the NCHS and the Census Bureau all agree that, in order to provide accurate data which is useful for determining the level of resources required to provide public health services, municapal infrastructure and research WITHIN EACH SPECIFIC STATE MUNICAPALITY, that data must be presented in such a way that it "can be interpreted" as promoted the need for such services and funding. <br /><br />It is very important the remain cognizant of the fact that each state treats/treated foreign birhs to U.S. citizens differently, with regard to how they choose to show the information on official records. Based on the ongoing investigation in Arizona and our contributions, we have strong statutory evidence which reveals, based on Hawaii's cultural and geopolitical history, that the Hawaiian municipality recorded Barack Obama's foreign birth as a "place of residence" allocation to his mother. This allocation then triggered the shallow evidence of a native birth record (albeit digitally fabricated) and announcements from that same "residentially allocated" birth record.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-20271869249756295782012-03-17T12:06:53.633-07:002012-03-17T12:06:53.633-07:00Well I can't argue with that. The courts are c...Well I can't argue with that. The courts are corrupt and in 1947 the supreme court ruled that there is a seperation of church and state. They based that decision not on the constitution but a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to a group of churches. In that letter he used the term " Wall of seperation ".Wizdronehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07949298855540614043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-58146119515455568032012-03-17T11:55:22.259-07:002012-03-17T11:55:22.259-07:00According to this web site:
Beginning in 1950, al...According to this web site:<br /> Beginning in 1950, all natality data was exclusively reported based on “place of residence” of the mother. And : “…births and deaths were assigned to the actual place of residence, no matter where they occurred.”<br />If this website is accurate then My Ex wife's BC should list Georgia as the place of birth not Ohio. I beleive the misconception here is due to the fact these statements are meant for the balancing of state populations in the census to what the state has recorded. The allocation of the residence only happens to determine actual population not to manipulate birth and death documents. <br />Notice the first statement says reported not recorded and the second one does not specify Domestic or Foreign, it states no matter where it occured. <br />The reason for the decadal rules about allocation are to reconcile the census, every decade, and the actual, accurs as it happens. The reconciliation is reported and the actual births and deaths are recorded.Wizdronehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07949298855540614043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-24198792974457949652012-03-16T20:59:09.173-07:002012-03-16T20:59:09.173-07:00Absolutely true. And John knew it too.
Must gave ...Absolutely true. And John knew it too. <br />Must gave been the torture that turned him into a Manchurian traitor <br />Tgen there was the editor of justia,com who scrubbed all references to Minor v. Happersett as early as 2007.vrajavalahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12279723539914847429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-27528605603009180252012-03-16T17:20:08.783-07:002012-03-16T17:20:08.783-07:00I, myself find the comment section of "contro...I, myself find the comment section of "controversial" stories or research that appears on the web sometimes even more interesting than the original story. And this comment section, Penbrook One, is a gold mine. <br /><br />Its clear that you've out researched all the pros in the MSM, and you can back it up by answering any question that has come at you almost immediately. Bravo. Thank you for putting your effort, and your reputation on the line, in the defense of this Constitutional Republic. I (and all of us who enjoy living in this Great Country) owe a debt of gratitude indeed!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09488484764204485540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-49150847607133594232012-03-16T15:28:03.480-07:002012-03-16T15:28:03.480-07:00Words do not describe how much we agree. You coul...Words do not describe how much we agree. You could not be more correct! Using photo editing software to intentionally alter the content of any digital image representing a document which originally existed in paper form, and which was intended to be a source of critical information confirming a claim of authenticity...IS called something other than an "error". <br /><br />Hold that headline close to your heart, friend. It will help you get through the challenges ahead.<br /><br />God bless you, in Christ our King.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-55933005585512163182012-03-16T07:09:02.201-07:002012-03-16T07:09:02.201-07:00It would seem to be slightly more than an "er...It would seem to be slightly more than an "error". An error would be selecting the wrong table or reading it incorrectly. Using photo editing software to change the meaning of a footnote by deleting words is called something other than an "error".Reality Checkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-17715929202358088692012-03-15T20:53:25.452-07:002012-03-15T20:53:25.452-07:00Interesting you mention "by on order of the c...Interesting you mention "by on order of the court", since that very same court system is corrupted beyond repair and has completely disregard more than 50 legal requests for access to the "president trying to hide something's" records. Denise Lind, Nazzorato, O'Carter, Malihi. All courts of Obama.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-66905658373530149912012-03-15T20:50:13.452-07:002012-03-15T20:50:13.452-07:00Not knowing the exact circumstances, I believe, si...Not knowing the exact circumstances, I believe, since Dayton is in the U.S. which means it was not a foreign birth, it could have been registered in its actual "place of occurrence" because it would be accounted as both occurring within and impacting the population of the U.S.... and, we might assume the birth of your mother was actually registered in Dayton, not Georgia? Just presumptions.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-3340297303890712212012-03-15T17:00:44.475-07:002012-03-15T17:00:44.475-07:00Lets talk about Executive Order 13489. I just got ...Lets talk about Executive Order 13489. I just got done reading it. Do you honestly think a president trying to hide something from the people would include a clause that provides the information to be released to the public by an order of the court, even if the president claims privilege?Wizdronehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07949298855540614043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-65194816465752303562012-03-15T16:54:40.384-07:002012-03-15T16:54:40.384-07:00Yeah I'm going to have to disagree with you on...Yeah I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. My Ex wife was born in Ohio in 1967. Her mother's place of residence was in Georgia at the time of her birth. The BC correctly lists her place of birth as Dayton Ohio.Wizdronehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07949298855540614043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-24689484339323933342012-03-15T11:38:41.239-07:002012-03-15T11:38:41.239-07:00Helen,
Excellent thoughts! The sources of infor...Helen, <br /><br />Excellent thoughts! The sources of information used by Obama defenders to conclude that Obama was born in Hawaii are taken from two fallow historical documents. The digitally fabricated internet image of an alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" and two copies of alleged newspaper announcements which take their information directly from the information provided by the registrar which was used prior to register the birth. Both of these sources show the same address which is the address of Ann Dunham's parents. It was confirmed that Ann Dunham was a resident at this address, as well, using historical Polk directory information applicable at the time of Obama's birth. <br /><br />Protocols for completing birth registrations stipulate that the birth certificate must contain the usual place of residence of the mother including address, city, county and state. In 1961, only about 6% of births were illegitimate or occuring to one parent. Because the mother MUST be at the birth (obviously), whereas the father does not, the NCHS mandated that birthplace information was provided in conjunction with the mother's usual place of residence, which is defined as her normal household where she "sleeps and lives most of the time", according to the Census Bureau. In 94% of births, which are the legitimate births, the household is typically under the father's name and therefore is the mother's address too. But this was not the case with Obama. His mother lived in a household with her parents. <br /><br />Another reason Obama's birth was not allocated to the Obama Sr's address is because the relationship between he and Dunham was estranged at this point. Grandma Dunham would have not even considered assigning baby Obama to Obama Sr. In fact, Obama Sr. was, in all likelihood, not even in Hawaii at this time, since he was already married to an African woman. <br /><br />If the birth occurs in a place outside of the location of the mother's place of residence, the certificate must still state the mother's place of residence as the location of the place of occurrence of the birth. <br /><br />The image of the Certificate of Live Birth (albeit digitally counterfeited)contains the address as the allocated location of the birth according to the mother's place of residence per NCHS protocols for reporting foreign occurring births to U.S. residence abroad.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-42920796257027991532012-03-15T10:44:50.466-07:002012-03-15T10:44:50.466-07:00I've read your three reports and find your res...I've read your three reports and find your research to be solid and very helpful. Thank you.<br /><br />Here's a question I'd welcome an answer to - Early in 2009, there were articles written that interviewed the neighbors in the Dunham neighborhood who stated for the record that they never saw any child, let alone an infant, living in the grandparents home. Ever.<br /><br />Yet her parents address is what is on the bc. But we know from Obama Sr's INS records he never listed their address as a place of residence and in fact, had a totally different one listed during the period of the natal event. <br /><br />Given your thorough research, is it factually correct to state the grandparents filed the birth information with a local registrar giving their address as place of "residence" when in fact, if she did, then wouldn't it only make sense that she would have filed her "residence" as that of her supposed husbands?<br /><br />Which would result in even more weight to the fact he was born somewhere other than Hawaii.Helenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11769230473421843167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-73897642862395683782012-03-15T08:42:16.049-07:002012-03-15T08:42:16.049-07:00Thank you for bringing this error to our attention...Thank you for bringing this error to our attention. You are correct. We have updated the data table image and information to more accurately show the difference between resident and non-resident transcripts from the year we intended. Thank you for checking in. Much appreciated.<br /><br />D-crozPenbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-13178573223948889852012-03-15T06:37:38.907-07:002012-03-15T06:37:38.907-07:00"outside of United States"? Did you guys..."outside of United States"? Did you guys go to the He, Lucas Smith School of Forgery? Nice try but you've been busted boys.<br /><br />http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-part-2/Reality Checkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-18118293145630007812012-03-14T15:58:28.809-07:002012-03-14T15:58:28.809-07:00Re: SR511 and McCain; Under the 1st naturalization...Re: SR511 and McCain; Under the 1st naturalization Act of 1790 McCain could claim NBC status, unfortunately for him, the SR511 and the CRS Reports, the 1790 Act was REPEALED and replaced by the 1795 Act which did not "consider" a child born abroad as if an NBC, but rather as if a "citizen" in the same manner the children of a newly naturalized persons children are considered citizens.<br /><br />Read the two Acts and judge for yourself;<br /><br />http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html<br /><br /><br />As for your reseach and analysis.....right on point and consistent with the facts on the gound, i.e., there is NO hospital generated record in HI, but rather a compilation of vital statistics entered on a 'delayed' or 'foreign' bith registration application.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-61243436827207383882012-03-13T17:08:01.060-07:002012-03-13T17:08:01.060-07:00Thanks Penbrook One for this blog and all that you...Thanks Penbrook One for this blog and all that you do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-61834063843744432832012-03-13T15:36:53.970-07:002012-03-13T15:36:53.970-07:00Thank you. The impetus of SR511 was that his pare...Thank you. The impetus of SR511 was that his parents were both U.S. citizens. Your clarifications are much appreciated.Penbrook Onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10526440225887842097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7623181557777206690.post-88151278042472070852012-03-13T15:21:23.894-07:002012-03-13T15:21:23.894-07:00John McCain was NOT born in the Panama Canal Zone ...John McCain was NOT born in the Panama Canal Zone as stated in this article.<br /><br />John Sidney McCain III was born at the Colon Hospital, located at Avenida Melendez and 2nd Street, Manzanillo Island, City of Colon, Republic of Panama. The time of birth on the birth certificate issued by Panama Railroad Company (that owned the Colon Hospital) was 5:25 PM and the day and date of birth was Saturday, August 29, 1936.Beckwithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02378034415571761905noreply@blogger.com