The Decorated Military Officer’s Righteous Fight To Measure Obama’s Integrity Is A Mantle For Vintage American Survival In Much The Same Way Our Founders Commanded
A Daily Pen guest editorial
by Dan Crosby
The superior actions of an honorable warrior speak louder than the inferior words of those who merely observe his struggle.
When Dr. Lakin decided to measure, qualify and, ultimately, challenge Barack Obama’s Constitutional standing to be America’s executive officer, he fully understood the price of his fight. Having already proven his "honor, duty, sacrifice and bravery" for 20 years on the fields of battle, fighting for America, he was suddenly confronted with the reality that he now must prove that honor, duty, sacrifice and bravery on the battle field of legal justice and integrity.
Liars and abettors beware. In criticizing Lakin's dutiful responsibility to challenge orders he believes are illegal, Obama sycophants are causing the storage of a special wrath for themselves. Their first offense is denying the truth of Lakin's honor and integrity as it emulates the foundations of America, itself. The very America in which they are allowed to reside...at least for the moment.
Lt. Col. Lakin has seen the horrific wounds of war. He as seen the cost of a blood ransomed nation and witnessed the loss of human life. As a medical doctor serving in the military, it’s difficult to imagine the pain and injury he has witnessed in the worthiest of freedom’s deservers. Dr. Lakin heals and comforts the young men and women who fight for us. He has done this loyally and without blemish for two decades.
Therefore, like many of our brave men and women serving in our military, there is no one with better qualifications to confront the dishonesty and lack of integrity of a civilian commander about his ineligibility to give orders to them than Dr. Lakin. Anyone doubting this should simply ask the soldiers and officers Lakin has served what they think. The contrast between a man like Lakin and a man like Obama is so vast it staggers the mind.
At the beginning of America's existence, Thomas Paine, an American founder said, “An army of principles can penetrate where an army of soldiers cannot.”
In the case of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, a vintage American hero and decorated military veteran, we can boldly add to Paine’s truth:
“…and if those we elect to represent us are void of those principles, that same army of soldiers must impose upon them by those principles.”
Obama's legal defenders, including the judge assigned to the case, are in a terrible position. They cannot address the merits of Lakin's case if their intention is to protect Obama's lies, yet they cannot allow the truth about Obama to be used to rebut Lakin's charges for fear of Obama's "embarrassment". Moreover, they cannot allow Lakin to be acquitted lest they undermine the command structure of the entire military apparatus. They understand that an acquittal would set a precedent allowing any military service member to refuse any order based on their challenge of Obama's eligibility to command a military giving that order. So, they can't fight and they can't surrender. Which leaves only one nauseating option available for them.
Obama must run and hide.
If Obama's minions attempt to meet the merits of the case, they understand that they would have to be measured by Lakin's standard and thereby be convicted of immeasureable offenses against a blood ransomed nation. Therefore, the only option available in his defense is to cower in the darkness away from the light.
In this result, Lakin is accomplishing something far more effective than exposing the truth about Obama's covert identity. Lakin is rendering him impotent against the essential value of America. For, as long as Obama runs away from the truth, he cannot be worthy of a relationship with vintage America. As long as Obama refuses to disclose his identity, openly to the essential peoples of America, he will not be able to gain the affect he desires from the source of America's value. As long as Obama abandons men like Lakin, the more distant he must retreat from the core of American principles.
This option is not necessary for Lakin. He need only maintain the standards of honesty, transparency and integrity by which he as served America for all of his professional life, and America will love him for it.
As such, Dr. Lakin should know, without doubt, that his name is spoken with honor, joy and pride among the echelons of vintage American heritage. He should forever be encouraged to simply disregard the inferior, cowardly, ignorance of those opposing him, knowing with full confidence that they do not matter to the honorability of America or the glory of God. He should know, and be told daily, by anyone who values truth, transparency and integrity, that his position for America is not only valid and right, it is graciously obligated of him in his sworn duty to not only uphold the documented sovereignty of the nation for which he fights, which is the Constitution of the United States, but to also demand that same documented sovereignty from those under whom he voluntarily surrenders his very existence and which he, himself, is asked to submit as identification in his duty to America. Ironically, unlike the President under whom he serves, Lakin must submit a valid, original birth certificate, passport and military service identification in order to be eligible for his duty.
However, let us be reminded. Dr. Lakin’s court martial for disobeying deployment orders is not about exposing Obama as it is about preserving the integrity of America’s reputation. Dr. Lakin understands this.
Unfortunately, however, the justice system available to Lakin is deficient of the character required to measure the metrics of his case on the merits of its evidence. The military Lakin now serves in does not deserve his level of dedicated service or his purity of honorable substance. This military has been usurped, and even corrupted, from the highest rank and influenced by roguish cowards too weak of mind to embrace the rule of law in such matters. So, perhaps it is poetic that his duty within it should be relieved under hostile conditions. If the dregs of Obama's regime were real Americans of the highest order, they would abandon all reservations to help Lakin in his endeavor. If they were truly men and women of integrity upholding the value of America's blood ransomed worth, they would sacrifice their own standing for Lakin's greater cause. Lakin understands this, too.
Certainly, Lakin believes that all men are created equal. However, he also understands that men deserve inequality through the course of this life after they have been created. Lakin sheds light on this truth more than anyone in our nation today. Bearing witness to the injury and death of warriors, Lakin will never say that he is worthier than anyone. His humility resounds authentically upon those unspeakable experiences, but Lakin must be made to understand that he deserves a extraordinary level of respect. It is an abomination that his lascivious opposers deny this in their hateful derision while supporting a figure as covertly blacked-out as Obama.
More importantly, however, Lakin also understands that, someday, perhaps many years from now, America’s future generations will wonder what some in our society were thinking. Suffering, they will ask what could have possibly possessed some citizens to make such destructive and depraved decisions in electing such a disdainful horde of unprincipled purveyors to govern what was once the greatest nation in the history of mankind.
Sadly, of course, the only actual answers available for the loss of that generation’s value will be that many today abandoned their honor for the fraud of governmentally imposed social justice. They will have to say that many betrayed America’s vintage heritage for a perverted global citizenry based on communal doctrine. They will have to admit that many allowed the destruction of themselves from within, enabling their own death, by shielding their enemies with political correctness and Godless existentialism.
Most tragically, however, America will have to explain to future Americans why they failed to uphold the essence of America's citizenry in men like Dr. Lakin. They will have to explain how they allowed the value of America’s worth to be undermined by a psychotic generation of hateful liberal extremists who ventured too far into their delusion, confiscating that worth through irresponsibility. Many will have to say that they allowed this today, recklessly, without caring that the maintenance of that worth will burden those Americans tomorrow.
Then, many will have to explain to that diminished generation how they allowed deranged radicals in America’s government to undersell their worth to global interests and enemies in order to create a perverted rendition of social equality through redistributive transformation and reparative economics. Many will actually have to explain why they allowed degenerates to legislate decency, charity and ability blessed exclusively to some of us.
In providing specific examples, among the many which will certainly exist, they will have to give an account to our great-grandchildren why they allowed our government and sheepish factions of liberal humanity to betray vintage American heroes.
Needless to say, there will be no worthy answer to explain their loss and the systematic death they will suffer. However, they will yearn for the merciful treatment and healing wisdom of men, like Lakin, who were rejected by corrupt legalists and incompetent legislators.
Honorable, merciful men, like Lt. Col. Terry Lakin will have long since passed. They will never have to explain the reasons for those befallen horrors. They are exempt from blame for America’s failure, now and then.
For now, Lakin must engage his fight on a second front. He now must apply his duty to protect the U.S. Constitution for a more important cause against the lack of integrity of our current leadership under which he serves and under whom serves those Lakin must witness the suffering of.
Upon such experience, Lakin is sovereign in his right to challenge the eligibility of Barack Obama. He is fighting a more insidious enemy than any radical muslim terrorist. He is fighting those who falsely claim to be protectors of vintage America while bleeding away its treasure and forsaking its blood ransomed sovereignty. Not only has Lakin done his job honorably among the dangers of war throughout the world, he is doing the job that others in our elected government are too cowardly to do. He is questioning their worthiness after being confronted with the blatant evidence of their deficiency.
More importantly, Lakin is now not only fighting to protect the sovereignty of our nation from terrorists, he is also fighting to prevent the usurpation of our society from within by treacherous, power lusting liars. Instead of applying his medical expertise and combat experience to mend the lives of battle field warriors, Lakin is applying his conscience and professional integrity to protect the lives of all Americans, now and in the future.
As with all those who serve in the American military, we owe Lt. Col. Lakin all that we are.
As a message to all liberals and Obama supporters alike, you might not like the fact that Dr. Lakin is challenging the integrity of someone you support. You might not like the fact that Dr. Lakin is a vintage American hero possessing a vast record of honorable service and decorated recognition which Obama does not possess. You might not even like him personally because of your dissonant prejudice to understand that your very right to be hateful and wrong is protected by worthier men, like him.
Certainly, you wanted to believe that the person you voted for was worthy of your vote. You wanted to believe that all of those endless arguments with your conservative friends would prove you right and justified. You wanted to believe that if Barack Obama was ever measured against another American, like Lakin, that he would not be proven to be the wanton, dishonest charlatan he has been shown to be.
You want to believe that your worth would be upheld by Obama…not a man like Lakin.
However, the teeth gnashing reality that you must now bear is that Lt. Col. Terry Lakin has more integrity and honor and credibility than Barack Obama will ever have. It’s understandable that truth is painful for you to accept, but that is just the way it is.
You see? Men and women, like Lt. Col. Lakin are the bearers of America’s value. They are the ones with the actual authority to determine the worthiness of our nation among its people because he has paid the price for its ransom…which is the right to be free.
Contrarily, Barack Obama is not a provider of freedom. He is an exploiter of it. Obama has lived a life without the record of service which endows Dr. Lakin’s value as an American. Obama is the worst kind of citizen. Rather than one willing to shed his blood for other’s freedom, Obama is one seeking to draw other’s blood for his freedom. This not only makes men, like Obama, criminal. It makes them an enemy.
Oh, you thought the duty of a good soldier was just to obey orders without reasoning? Sorry, the Constitution disagrees.
When Thomas Paine wrote “Common Sense”, America was also under the threat of a powerful, but evil regime. Paine, like Lakin, seemed to understand that the essence of America exists in its forthright leadership toward remaining loyal to principles, truth and decency. Paine, like Lakin, seemed to understand that the greatest bastion of this essence was embodied by those we choose to represent us and, that if we failed to pick men and women worthy of the blood ransom paid by those for its sovereignty, we are truly in peril of losing our liberty and thus, our worth to one another, and thus our very existence.
In the end, even if Dr. Lakin loses his freedom at the hands of Obama’s abetting, corrupted judges, even if he is dishonorably discharged from under a now dishonorable military command hierarchy, even if he loses his monetary compensation as an exceptional medical professional, even if he must perform hard labor under this fraud-ridden circumstance, even if the inferior liberal portion of America betrays him…it is forever necessary that he carries within him the knowledge that he is the essential worthiness of America, unburdened by his decision to fight these enemies.
These truths become apparent because we are now forced to compare the character of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin with the character of Barack Obama. It has come to this dichotomy not because of Dr. Lakin’s dutiful responsibility to act in accordance with honor, but rather, it has come to this because of Barack Obama’s disdainful choice to act covertly in violation of the standard of honor set by Lakin.
That comparison is simply not fair. Obama can never reach that mark.
This is a last available opportunity for Obama to tell the truth. He has the opportunity to act in accordance with what is right, true and honorable and win some semblance of respectability as a man, even if his political identity is dissolved. This is an opportunity for Obama to be truly set free from social injustice and personal desperation. This is an opportunity for Obama to stand with Lt. Col. Lakin and make himself truly known before men, and God. For, at a minimum Barack Obama owes Terry Lakin, and all Americans, the truth. At most, based on comparable biographies, Obama owes Lakin for his existence in America. If Lakin goes to prison, that opportunity is lost forever. Mercy can only store wrath for so long before the constraints of grace give way.
God bless Lt. Col. Terry Lakin in his righteousness. And, yes, may God bless Barack Obama, that truth and transparency will win him over before it is too late, and that he will join the American people in preserving the blood ransomed sovereignty of the last, greatest nation on earth.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Judge Cheats Lakin But Accidentally Exposes Obama’s “Embarrassing” Natal Identity
What information does Obama’s natal documentation and biographical records contain that judge knows would be humiliating for Obama?
A Daily Pen guest editorial
by Dan Crosby
Sometimes, judges make unpopular decisions based on a responsible adherence to the rule of law. It has only been during the recent era of neo-liberalism in America, however, that we have actually seen judges act stupidly and contrive irrelevant opinions which abrogate the essence of constitutional law.
In what may be characterized as the most subjectively advocatory decision in military justice history, Army Judge Col. Denise Lind, presiding in the case against Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, refused to allow the defendant his right to access commonly available evidence in his defense. Lakin is charged with disobeying deployment orders under UCMJ Articles 87 and 92.
In a pretrial hearing held at Fort Meade, Maryland, on September 2, 2010, Lakin’s defense team requested discovery of Obama’s natal documentation and scholastic records pertaining to his identity and relevance to determining his Constitutional eligibility to hold the office of the presidency.
The biographic information, which covers Obama's natal history, parentage, school attendance, travel and political roots between 1959 and 1994 is currently being held under top secret treatment by several institutions and Hawaiian municipal agencies acting under the control of, and in the interest of, the Obama administration. Essentially, Obama's opacity is acting to undermine his effectiveness more than the revelation of the documents could ever do.
This same request for discovery of evidence is granted in hundreds of American courts every year, in every classification of civil and military proceedings. Yet, despite the fact that access to this type of documentation has never been denied in any case when it serves as “at first view” evidence, known as Prima-Facie evidence, toward proving the facts of guilt or innocence, Lind went completely outside her jurisdiction in denying the merits of Lakin’s request.
Lind subjectively opined that Lakin’s request for Obama’s records are, “not relevant for the military to be considering such claims” and that “the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face” and that “the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.”
Then, the judge suddenly endowed herself with psychiatric qualifications in support of Obama. In what can only be characterized as shortsighted emotionalism for Obama’s delicate sensitivity to humiliation, Lind made this shocking statement:
“…opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president, and it’s up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.”
A Daily Pen guest editorial
by Dan Crosby
Sometimes, judges make unpopular decisions based on a responsible adherence to the rule of law. It has only been during the recent era of neo-liberalism in America, however, that we have actually seen judges act stupidly and contrive irrelevant opinions which abrogate the essence of constitutional law.
In what may be characterized as the most subjectively advocatory decision in military justice history, Army Judge Col. Denise Lind, presiding in the case against Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, refused to allow the defendant his right to access commonly available evidence in his defense. Lakin is charged with disobeying deployment orders under UCMJ Articles 87 and 92.
In a pretrial hearing held at Fort Meade, Maryland, on September 2, 2010, Lakin’s defense team requested discovery of Obama’s natal documentation and scholastic records pertaining to his identity and relevance to determining his Constitutional eligibility to hold the office of the presidency.
The biographic information, which covers Obama's natal history, parentage, school attendance, travel and political roots between 1959 and 1994 is currently being held under top secret treatment by several institutions and Hawaiian municipal agencies acting under the control of, and in the interest of, the Obama administration. Essentially, Obama's opacity is acting to undermine his effectiveness more than the revelation of the documents could ever do.
This same request for discovery of evidence is granted in hundreds of American courts every year, in every classification of civil and military proceedings. Yet, despite the fact that access to this type of documentation has never been denied in any case when it serves as “at first view” evidence, known as Prima-Facie evidence, toward proving the facts of guilt or innocence, Lind went completely outside her jurisdiction in denying the merits of Lakin’s request.
Lind subjectively opined that Lakin’s request for Obama’s records are, “not relevant for the military to be considering such claims” and that “the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face” and that “the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.”
Then, the judge suddenly endowed herself with psychiatric qualifications in support of Obama. In what can only be characterized as shortsighted emotionalism for Obama’s delicate sensitivity to humiliation, Lind made this shocking statement:
“…opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president, and it’s up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.”
This statement is unprecedented in American military justice history. It is a blatant violation of the most basic legal protections in our legal system, civilian or military.
“This is not a judge in submission to the rule of law,” said an ALAC spokesperson who asked to remain anonymous, “this is a radical enabler of the plaintiff. She is harmful in her opinion. Her decision sets precedence for actually allowing elected officials, regardless of the possible illegality of their appointment, the ability to violate Constitutional law and then hide the evidence of their crime. Lind is ridiculous and her course of action is far more harmful to the nation than embarrassing an ensconced maliform, like Obama.”
The tragedy of Lind's mistake, however, is her presumption that Obama is on trial instead of Lakin. Lind, like so many afoul judges has been summarily overridden in their ability to separate the realm of political consequence and legal justice. Obama's political well being is not more important than upholding the sovereignty of the citizenry and the timeless Constitutional rights endowed to them by God. Obama is not on trial here. Lakin is.
"Judges are not allowed to make decisions because they are afraid of the political consequences for someone. Obama is not even involved in this trial, but Lakin is. Any consequences perceived by Lind as to their adversity against Obama is clearly irrelevent in this case. She is obligated to consider the rule of law, not political consequences."
Under UCMJ SCR 47, Lakin is afforded the right to call any evidence or testimony in his defense when that evidence has not been proven in court to cause harm for those providing it. To date, no evidence about Obama's personal history has been proven to be harmful to him or those who hold it.
Someone needs to inform Lind that Obama losing a prospective election does not qualify as harm as a legal excuse for denying an American citizen's right to defend himself.
By putting Obama's sensibilities ahead of the Constitution, Lind has committed one of the most abhorrent litigatory acts in history. She has "propped" the interests of a single man ahead of the Constitutional welfare of an entire nation of people while violating her own sworn duty to defend that same Constitution. Lind should be removed from this case and immediately removed from judicial service.
Of course, we knew the Obama regime would not make it easy for Lakin to prove he is right about Obama, but when judges, themselves, deprive an honorable, exceptional, decorated military veteran his legal right to defend himself, with unclassified evidence, we have lost our way as a nation. However, when that deprivation of rights takes precedence over a risk of “embarrassing” a politician who is under vast suspicion of criminal wrongdoing in a judges decision, we have lost the sovereignty of America. Game over. Its time to arm yourself.
Moreover, What does Lind know about Obama’s covert identity?
Lind seemed to suggest that she holds specific understanding about the nature of the information about Obama while also hinting that the only way to deal with an entrenched figure like Obama is to seek Congressional proceedings in having him removed.
However, Lind fails to understand that if Obama is not eligibile to be president to begin with, Congress does not have the power to impeach him because he is not the president in the first place.
"Correct," says the ALAC spokesperson, "The only course of action is law enforcement to intervene. The legislative branch has no power in this case. Again, Lind is mistaken."
The only way to have Obama removed from the White House is to treat him as common trespasser if it is indeed discovered that he is ineligible to be president. He only needs to be arrested and tried as a usurper and an impersonator of an elected official. There is no legal mechanism for impeaching an ineligible candidate who was elected under false pretenses. However, the social and political pressure would mount so massively that he would have to be deported for his own safety. A result which is ironically meet.
"Basically, he becomes a party crasher, only worse. He was a fraud endowed with control of the most powerful military force in human history. Kinda scary to think, under similar circumstances, that the Salahis could have assumed control over our nuclear arsenal."
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Army Judge In Lakin Case Joins Civilian Cowards In Protecting Obama’s Lie
Ruling Against Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Right To Evidence Supporting His Own Defense, Colonel Denise R. Lind Obstructs Justice And Undermines The Sovereignty Of America
by Penbrook Johannson
Fort Meade, Maryland – U.S. Army military judge, Col. Denise R. Lind, presiding over a hearing in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, joined the slew of legal obstructionists today when she ruled that her military court would not serve as a stage to evaluate the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama.
In the wake of Lind’s decision, calls began flooding the media and internet in support of military personnel to act in accordance with Lakin’s example and disobey all orders until such time Mr. Obama provides documentation proving he is eligible to be the military's commander-in-chief.
Millions of respondents seeking to preserve the honor of America’s military and protect the sovereignty of America, spoke out to remind military personnel that their honor will always be upheld in the eyes of those who matter, and their courage will be recognized in their righteous, conscientious objection of this fraudulent contravention of our founder's blood ransomed nation. Many wanted to simply encourage active military service members to be brave, refuse orders, and let the course of legal and political forces reach a critical mass forcing authority against Obama.
One astonishing outpouring from thousands of veterans was the proclamation that they would find more honor in duty to America by opposing Obama's illegal command and be found guilty in military court rather than fulfill their military service within Obama's fraudulent chain of command. Many said they would rather serve prison time under a sentence of hard labor than serve with "fake honor" under Obama.
"A dishonorable discharge from a military hijacked by a dishonorable command is an honorable thing," said one veteran, "Lakin is the epitome of honor and justice."
Another agreed, "At least you go out knowing you stood right for protecting America, the constitution and for your brothers in arms by attempting to expose a suspected invader. You can't even say Obama is a traitor. A traitor has to be on your side to start with, then betray you. But, what do you call someone who assaults you first? You call them the enemy."
He continued, "Anyone going to prison for opposing this liar is considered a prisoner-of-war in my book and should get formal commendations once he is released. I would rather be a legitimate inmate than dishonorably ranked."
Those responding to Lind's decision seemed to understand that honorability and integrity begins at the top of the command structure.
Following more than 4 years of obscurity and lies, it has become obvious that a vast majority of Americans now support the forced exposure of Obama’s records containing any and all information about his natal history and identity.
During the hearing, Lind ruled that Lakin’s defense team would not be allowed to have access to any of Obama's records as well as any testimony from Hawaiian officials who have access to the records.
Lind’s unqualified decision falls lock-step in line with a horde of shockingly obtuse federal judges dismissing civil lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility or which demand verification of his natal documentation proving he meets the Natural Born citizen requirement of the Constitution to hold the office of the presidency. Every judge in each case has denied the plaintiffs' access to any requested documentation regarding the president's eligibility.
As reported by World Net Daily, Lind incorrectly concluded that it was "not relevant" for the military to be considering claims against Obama’s eligibility, and that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led only as far as unnamed Pentagon officials which Lind did not identify, yet she said that should have been sufficient for Lakin to obey deployment orders.
Paul Rolf Jensen, Lakin's civilian attorney, said the courts now have denied his client the opportunity to present his defense despite according to U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant put on court martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his or her defense.
NEWSFLASH TO LIND: FEDERAL LAWS SUPERCEDE STATE LAWS IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS
Evidence clarifying Obama's authority over Lakin would include an original, 1961, federal NVSD "Certificate of Live Birth" signed by an attending physician if, as Obama has said, he was indeed born in a hospital in the U.S. The 1961 U.S. Report on Vital Statistics, Volume 1: Natality dictates the "Certificate of Live Birth" as the 'standard certificate' to be used by state health agencies in recording births in the U.S. The Certificate of Live Birth originated in America 50 years before Hawaii became a state, and 52 years before Obama was born.
To date, Obama has provided no such federally issued, official documentation verifying his natural born citizenship, thereby proving he is eligible to be president. Instead, the Obama administration has co-opted abettors of the state of Hawaii municipal government to produce an independently published cover document designed to conceal and protect natal identity, not disclose it.
The Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth" has been widely disseminated by Obama propagandists as a legitimate birth certificate endowing Obama with federal approval. However, at the time of Obama's election the Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth" was not even unanimously accepted by all agencies in that state. The Department of Hawaiian Homelands rejects the "Certification of Live Birth" as adequate identification for its services. Also, there is longstanding legal precedence showing that federal documentation supercedes the inferior authority of state-level documentation when a candidate is seeking eligibility to run for federal office. The presidency is obviously a federal office, not a state-level office.
The governor of the state of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, the director of the Hawaiian Department of Health, Chiyome Fukino along with Hawaiian Registrar, Alvin Onaka, are key witnesses to Obama's records in that state. In Hawaii, state-level legalisms and administrative rules, which diametrically conflict with federal eligibility laws of the Constitution, are being exploited by these municipal deceivers in order to allow them to "justify" their lack of cooperation.
The two Hawaiian statutes which are being exploited to unlawfully shelter and enable Obama's criminality are HRS 338-17.8 and HRS 338-18, along with Administrative Rule 91. The first statute says that the Hawaiian Department of Health is obligated to issue a Hawaiian birth certificate for births to parents who claim Hawaii as their residence within a year of the birth, regardless of the location of the birth. A.R. 91 puts the authority for determining the validity of the information submitted by the applicant for such certificate solely in the hands of the Hawaiian Health Director, Chiyome Fukino.
HRS 338-18 conveniently allows municipal employees to refuse to disclose information in vital records to the public.
Judge Lind understands that sworn testimony from these individuals would prove that Obama possesses documentation which has not been revealed and possibly does not possess natural born citizenship and is therefore not qualified to be president.
It has since been learned that Lingle has strong economic and political ties to Obama's adoptive father, Lolo Soetoro's, home country of Indonesia, a "Pacific rim" commerce partner with both Hawaii and Japan. Obama lived in Indonesia as a boy in the late 1960's and many believe that he still has citizenry and interests there. Given her's and Obama's mutual political and economic affiliations with the Pacific rim, Muslim nation, Lingle has a clear motive to protect Obama's presidency. Lingle is also a close friend of Obama's Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano.
In an hour-long apologetic dissertation, judge Lind proclaimed that opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the "president", even though no proof exists that Obama is actually the president, and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president. In her shortsighted reasoning, Lind failed to grasp the legal reality that Obama, by way of his unproven eligibility, has never been and cannot be confirmed as a legally recognized "sitting president" and therefore is not subject to Lind's judicial compassion to protect him from "embarassment".
Lind also wrongly presumes that Obama is automatically a legitimate president simply because he was voted for by a majority of voters. Lind needs to be scolded and reminded that the Constitutional mandates governing eligibilty circumvent the result of any popularity contest.
Lind made her irresponsible conclusions while disregarding the vast and mounting evidence against Obama. The evidence irrefutably shows that Obama was never properly vetted or biographically analyzed as a candidate and, therefore, is only able to usurp the authority of the position without having the ability to hold its power.
THE CONSTITUTION IN CRISIS
The power of a legitimate presidency is timeless. This means that a legitimate president is able to invoke legally upheld executive power while in office which later must either be judicially and legislatively enforced after his departure from office, or which can only be changed or repealed by the Constitutional processes moving forward.
However, if a president is found to be illegimate after trespassing the office, the Constitution has no power to address or uphold the implements of usurped power. Therefore, all laws, vetoes, executive orders, military commands, international treaties, pardons, agreements and records created during the fraudulent office holder's criminal residence are contravened by a rescinding outside of the jurisdiction of our legal system. This means that if Obama is ever found to be ineligible as a president, at anytime in American history, it must be decreed by a Constitutional Amendment process that America was without executive leadership for the time of the usurpation. All references of Obama as a president would be legally removed from historical records and the power of the U.S. presidency during that time would be declared void. Foreign nations could assert their "right" to claim concessions lost during that time. Pardoned inmates would have to be re-arrested and perhaps, in cases of capital punishment, be put to death without appeal. Treaties signed by he usurper would immediately be void allowing hostilities to resume. International economic contracts would be cancelled.
The consequences threatening America because of Obama's actions are potentially cataclysmic to the very existence of the nation.
Lind, like many wrong-headed judges, fails to grasp that Obama's ineligibility has no statute of limitation. At any point in the future, his presidency can be nullified thereby creating a Constitutional crisis of irreparable proportions. The fact that Obama was never confirmed as an eligible candidate automatically disqualifies him from any legitimacy regardless of the result of any electoral process. An election carried out under false pretenses is void in all cases. Essentially, Lind failed in her judicial duty to uphold the authority of the Constitution over the electoral process. Instead, she audaciously and harmfully declared the electoral process, even one which invokes a usurper, as the authority over the Constitution, which was written specifically to prevent individuals like Obama from taking power in America.
Also, Lind upheld protective cessation for Obama even though her failure to uphold the merits of Lakin’s valid case only works to undermine the credibility of Obama as an individual. Her actions did more to "embarrass" Obama than any legal action demanding that truth set him free. By disallowing a vintage American hero's rightful request to verify the qualifications of his superior, before agreeing to obey mortally threatening orders to deploy during active combat, Lind has essentially rejected that which is honorable and enabled criminal behavior at the highest level of command. In essence, she has approved the violation of the legal jurisdiction of the Constitution while permitting an ongoing deception to bring shame upon, not only Obama as an individual, but the office of the U.S. Presidency in the future.
Lind's decision came just days after retired U.S. Air Force, Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney, who commanded nuclear armed forces, filed an affidavit saying that the disclosure of Obama's documentation is not just critical to Lakin's defense, but to the preservation of the nation itself.
"There can be no question that it is absolutely essential to good order and discipline in the military that there be no break in the unified chain of command, from the lowliest E-1 up to and including the commander in chief who is under the Constitution, the president of the United States. As military officers, we owe our ultimate loyalty not to superior officers or even to the president, but rather, to the Constitution," stated McInerney.
He explained, "good order and discipline requires not blind obedience to all orders but instead requires officers to judge – sometimes under great adversity – whether an order is illegal."
Lind also failed to understand that each and every time a judge dismisses a case or prejudges an law abiding citizen or military service member, it only ratchets up the political ante, expands media awareness and increases the pressure on successive case holders to establish Obama’s authenticity and legitimate authority.
Unfortunately, the Obama regime has proven itself to be the most dishonest, opaque band of anti-Americans in history. For every true patriot who suffers injustice at the hands of those protecting Obama’s lie, it only undermines the security of America more.
Perhaps when all this is said and done, Lt. Colonel Terry Lakin should run for President. After all, we know he has a legitimate birth certificate.
by Penbrook Johannson
Fort Meade, Maryland – U.S. Army military judge, Col. Denise R. Lind, presiding over a hearing in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, joined the slew of legal obstructionists today when she ruled that her military court would not serve as a stage to evaluate the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama.
In the wake of Lind’s decision, calls began flooding the media and internet in support of military personnel to act in accordance with Lakin’s example and disobey all orders until such time Mr. Obama provides documentation proving he is eligible to be the military's commander-in-chief.
Millions of respondents seeking to preserve the honor of America’s military and protect the sovereignty of America, spoke out to remind military personnel that their honor will always be upheld in the eyes of those who matter, and their courage will be recognized in their righteous, conscientious objection of this fraudulent contravention of our founder's blood ransomed nation. Many wanted to simply encourage active military service members to be brave, refuse orders, and let the course of legal and political forces reach a critical mass forcing authority against Obama.
One astonishing outpouring from thousands of veterans was the proclamation that they would find more honor in duty to America by opposing Obama's illegal command and be found guilty in military court rather than fulfill their military service within Obama's fraudulent chain of command. Many said they would rather serve prison time under a sentence of hard labor than serve with "fake honor" under Obama.
"A dishonorable discharge from a military hijacked by a dishonorable command is an honorable thing," said one veteran, "Lakin is the epitome of honor and justice."
Another agreed, "At least you go out knowing you stood right for protecting America, the constitution and for your brothers in arms by attempting to expose a suspected invader. You can't even say Obama is a traitor. A traitor has to be on your side to start with, then betray you. But, what do you call someone who assaults you first? You call them the enemy."
He continued, "Anyone going to prison for opposing this liar is considered a prisoner-of-war in my book and should get formal commendations once he is released. I would rather be a legitimate inmate than dishonorably ranked."
Those responding to Lind's decision seemed to understand that honorability and integrity begins at the top of the command structure.
Following more than 4 years of obscurity and lies, it has become obvious that a vast majority of Americans now support the forced exposure of Obama’s records containing any and all information about his natal history and identity.
During the hearing, Lind ruled that Lakin’s defense team would not be allowed to have access to any of Obama's records as well as any testimony from Hawaiian officials who have access to the records.
Lind’s unqualified decision falls lock-step in line with a horde of shockingly obtuse federal judges dismissing civil lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility or which demand verification of his natal documentation proving he meets the Natural Born citizen requirement of the Constitution to hold the office of the presidency. Every judge in each case has denied the plaintiffs' access to any requested documentation regarding the president's eligibility.
As reported by World Net Daily, Lind incorrectly concluded that it was "not relevant" for the military to be considering claims against Obama’s eligibility, and that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led only as far as unnamed Pentagon officials which Lind did not identify, yet she said that should have been sufficient for Lakin to obey deployment orders.
Paul Rolf Jensen, Lakin's civilian attorney, said the courts now have denied his client the opportunity to present his defense despite according to U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant put on court martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his or her defense.
NEWSFLASH TO LIND: FEDERAL LAWS SUPERCEDE STATE LAWS IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS
Evidence clarifying Obama's authority over Lakin would include an original, 1961, federal NVSD "Certificate of Live Birth" signed by an attending physician if, as Obama has said, he was indeed born in a hospital in the U.S. The 1961 U.S. Report on Vital Statistics, Volume 1: Natality dictates the "Certificate of Live Birth" as the 'standard certificate' to be used by state health agencies in recording births in the U.S. The Certificate of Live Birth originated in America 50 years before Hawaii became a state, and 52 years before Obama was born.
To date, Obama has provided no such federally issued, official documentation verifying his natural born citizenship, thereby proving he is eligible to be president. Instead, the Obama administration has co-opted abettors of the state of Hawaii municipal government to produce an independently published cover document designed to conceal and protect natal identity, not disclose it.
The Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth" has been widely disseminated by Obama propagandists as a legitimate birth certificate endowing Obama with federal approval. However, at the time of Obama's election the Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth" was not even unanimously accepted by all agencies in that state. The Department of Hawaiian Homelands rejects the "Certification of Live Birth" as adequate identification for its services. Also, there is longstanding legal precedence showing that federal documentation supercedes the inferior authority of state-level documentation when a candidate is seeking eligibility to run for federal office. The presidency is obviously a federal office, not a state-level office.
The governor of the state of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, the director of the Hawaiian Department of Health, Chiyome Fukino along with Hawaiian Registrar, Alvin Onaka, are key witnesses to Obama's records in that state. In Hawaii, state-level legalisms and administrative rules, which diametrically conflict with federal eligibility laws of the Constitution, are being exploited by these municipal deceivers in order to allow them to "justify" their lack of cooperation.
The two Hawaiian statutes which are being exploited to unlawfully shelter and enable Obama's criminality are HRS 338-17.8 and HRS 338-18, along with Administrative Rule 91. The first statute says that the Hawaiian Department of Health is obligated to issue a Hawaiian birth certificate for births to parents who claim Hawaii as their residence within a year of the birth, regardless of the location of the birth. A.R. 91 puts the authority for determining the validity of the information submitted by the applicant for such certificate solely in the hands of the Hawaiian Health Director, Chiyome Fukino.
HRS 338-18 conveniently allows municipal employees to refuse to disclose information in vital records to the public.
Judge Lind understands that sworn testimony from these individuals would prove that Obama possesses documentation which has not been revealed and possibly does not possess natural born citizenship and is therefore not qualified to be president.
It has since been learned that Lingle has strong economic and political ties to Obama's adoptive father, Lolo Soetoro's, home country of Indonesia, a "Pacific rim" commerce partner with both Hawaii and Japan. Obama lived in Indonesia as a boy in the late 1960's and many believe that he still has citizenry and interests there. Given her's and Obama's mutual political and economic affiliations with the Pacific rim, Muslim nation, Lingle has a clear motive to protect Obama's presidency. Lingle is also a close friend of Obama's Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano.
In an hour-long apologetic dissertation, judge Lind proclaimed that opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the "president", even though no proof exists that Obama is actually the president, and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president. In her shortsighted reasoning, Lind failed to grasp the legal reality that Obama, by way of his unproven eligibility, has never been and cannot be confirmed as a legally recognized "sitting president" and therefore is not subject to Lind's judicial compassion to protect him from "embarassment".
Lind also wrongly presumes that Obama is automatically a legitimate president simply because he was voted for by a majority of voters. Lind needs to be scolded and reminded that the Constitutional mandates governing eligibilty circumvent the result of any popularity contest.
Lind made her irresponsible conclusions while disregarding the vast and mounting evidence against Obama. The evidence irrefutably shows that Obama was never properly vetted or biographically analyzed as a candidate and, therefore, is only able to usurp the authority of the position without having the ability to hold its power.
THE CONSTITUTION IN CRISIS
The power of a legitimate presidency is timeless. This means that a legitimate president is able to invoke legally upheld executive power while in office which later must either be judicially and legislatively enforced after his departure from office, or which can only be changed or repealed by the Constitutional processes moving forward.
However, if a president is found to be illegimate after trespassing the office, the Constitution has no power to address or uphold the implements of usurped power. Therefore, all laws, vetoes, executive orders, military commands, international treaties, pardons, agreements and records created during the fraudulent office holder's criminal residence are contravened by a rescinding outside of the jurisdiction of our legal system. This means that if Obama is ever found to be ineligible as a president, at anytime in American history, it must be decreed by a Constitutional Amendment process that America was without executive leadership for the time of the usurpation. All references of Obama as a president would be legally removed from historical records and the power of the U.S. presidency during that time would be declared void. Foreign nations could assert their "right" to claim concessions lost during that time. Pardoned inmates would have to be re-arrested and perhaps, in cases of capital punishment, be put to death without appeal. Treaties signed by he usurper would immediately be void allowing hostilities to resume. International economic contracts would be cancelled.
The consequences threatening America because of Obama's actions are potentially cataclysmic to the very existence of the nation.
Lind, like many wrong-headed judges, fails to grasp that Obama's ineligibility has no statute of limitation. At any point in the future, his presidency can be nullified thereby creating a Constitutional crisis of irreparable proportions. The fact that Obama was never confirmed as an eligible candidate automatically disqualifies him from any legitimacy regardless of the result of any electoral process. An election carried out under false pretenses is void in all cases. Essentially, Lind failed in her judicial duty to uphold the authority of the Constitution over the electoral process. Instead, she audaciously and harmfully declared the electoral process, even one which invokes a usurper, as the authority over the Constitution, which was written specifically to prevent individuals like Obama from taking power in America.
Also, Lind upheld protective cessation for Obama even though her failure to uphold the merits of Lakin’s valid case only works to undermine the credibility of Obama as an individual. Her actions did more to "embarrass" Obama than any legal action demanding that truth set him free. By disallowing a vintage American hero's rightful request to verify the qualifications of his superior, before agreeing to obey mortally threatening orders to deploy during active combat, Lind has essentially rejected that which is honorable and enabled criminal behavior at the highest level of command. In essence, she has approved the violation of the legal jurisdiction of the Constitution while permitting an ongoing deception to bring shame upon, not only Obama as an individual, but the office of the U.S. Presidency in the future.
Lind's decision came just days after retired U.S. Air Force, Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney, who commanded nuclear armed forces, filed an affidavit saying that the disclosure of Obama's documentation is not just critical to Lakin's defense, but to the preservation of the nation itself.
"There can be no question that it is absolutely essential to good order and discipline in the military that there be no break in the unified chain of command, from the lowliest E-1 up to and including the commander in chief who is under the Constitution, the president of the United States. As military officers, we owe our ultimate loyalty not to superior officers or even to the president, but rather, to the Constitution," stated McInerney.
He explained, "good order and discipline requires not blind obedience to all orders but instead requires officers to judge – sometimes under great adversity – whether an order is illegal."
Lind also failed to understand that each and every time a judge dismisses a case or prejudges an law abiding citizen or military service member, it only ratchets up the political ante, expands media awareness and increases the pressure on successive case holders to establish Obama’s authenticity and legitimate authority.
Unfortunately, the Obama regime has proven itself to be the most dishonest, opaque band of anti-Americans in history. For every true patriot who suffers injustice at the hands of those protecting Obama’s lie, it only undermines the security of America more.
Perhaps when all this is said and done, Lt. Colonel Terry Lakin should run for President. After all, we know he has a legitimate birth certificate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
