Tuesday, March 29, 2011
by Daniel Crosby
The Daily Pen
According to Donald Trump, the beautiful thing about being him is that he is very rich…and influential. Agreed. However, in the past week, “The Donald” also appears to be a pragmatist.
Decidedly conservative, politically, if not socially, Donald Trump’s identity as a financial mogul is perhaps the most recognizable among his class in modern history. Despite less than ringing endorsements of his political competencies, the man knows his business. Worth an estimated 12 billion dollars in stakeholdings, and an unquantifiable value in “media personality power”, Trump has been seriously considering a run for America’s highest political office, not just because he thinks he can do a better job than the current crew, but because he has a bird’s eye view of America’s declining status in the world at the hands of those he considers utterly unqualified to be leaders of the country.
Sure, many pundits and plaudits don’t give him much of a serious chance, not that he isn’t a good leader and an exceptional manager mind you, but rather, apparently, because he is not as adept at lying and stealing as would be required to delve into the depths of a politician’s ilk.
Trump, better than anyone, understands that politics is no place for truly successful people…unless politicians begin hurting those same successful people. People like him.
However, there is no arguing the fact that he would be far better than the dreg squatting at 1600 presently. At least Trump is unquestionably eligible to be president…and, unlike Obama, is more than willing to show original documents and biometrics to prove it. Like other superior Americans, Trump has some legitimate questions about the Constitutional eligibility and identity of Barack Obama. He has been making the talkshow/news rounds this week presenting what has essentially been the prevailing view outside of the inept domain of mainstream media consciousness for the past three years. In the past week he has taken advantage of his publicity to ask the long-unanswered question dogging Obama’s clandestine identity to date.
“Where is Obama’s original birth certificate?” Trump asked in the course of routine discussion during an interview with the gaggle of The View on ABC on March 23.
A question to which The View’s resident Constitutional law “expert” (not) and pro-Obama provocateur, Whoopi Goldberg piped in proclaiming that becoming president somehow automatically makes the office holder eligible. Goldberg’s statement was, of course, factually errant, ridiculous and bulging with liberal stupidity.
Goldberg then aspired for higher intellect by calling Trump's audacity to challenge her politigod as, "dog-mess" and, of course, implied that Trump was a racist as is the standard manure crapped out of the mouths of liberals who have no answer for Obama's secrecy and criminal behavior.
The Constitution explicitly mandates that a presidential candidate must be a “natural-born” citizen whose definition can be summarily concluded from historical references at the time of the writing of the Constitution as an individual born in a geographic location under the protection of the U.S. Constitution to two parents who are both U.S. citizens, from which time the candidate must have maintained this natural-born status from birth to election without interruption by artificial or legal resection through dual citizenry, adoption, expatriation, renouncement or otherwise loss of natural born citizenship.
Even if Obama was born in Hawaii, as most ignorantly focus on, and which has never been decisively proven with original documented evidence in the form of an official, NVSD 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” issued by a hospital, signed by a doctor, attested by an informant and recorded at the local vital records office by a licensed registrar, he is, more significantly, disqualified from being president by the fact that his alleged birth father, Barack Obama Sr., was not a U.S. Citizen and the possibility that his citizenship status was lost when he was adopted by his Indonesian step-father, Lolo Soetoro.
It is upon these three specific circumstances which have brought harsh criticism and doubts about Obama’s historical biography since 2007, and which, no doubt, have caused Donald Trump to rightly inquire, likewise.
Following his appearance on The View, Trump expanded his analysis on the Fox News Channel on March 28, saying, "The fact is if you're not born in the United States, you cannot be president…He (Obama) has spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue. Millions of dollars in legal fees trying to get away from this issue. I brought it up just routinely. All of a sudden a lot of facts are emerging, and I'm starting to wonder myself whether he was born in this country.”
It’s also interesting to consider a figure typically concerning himself with so many other big things that Donald Trump would be willing take such a correct and decisive position on such an important, but under-reported matter, not because it is not the right position, but because he is just so much more equipped to be right about the bigger idea of expelling Obama and blazing trails which conflagrate around billion dollar money matters, not criminal behavior by politicians. If Donald Trump really wants to be president, he could probably buy it…like every other candidate has done since communists created their own party.
For the past three years, the swarthy econ-adonis has railed against the policies of the illegitimate Obama regime, particularly policies which have been shown to be prolonging America’s economic misery. Trump’s specific angst resides against this government’s spending psychosis and our unconscionable selling of America to foreign interests under unfathomable debt, primarily to communist nations like China.
Years of wisdom gained from putting his money where his mouth is affords Trump with the sentinel qualities to recognize the difference between a real deal and a fraud. He knows the truth when he sees it, and apparently, when he looks at Obama, he sees what the rest of us see. A lie.
Adding Trumps voice to the four-year internet-based paradigm raging against Obama’s deceptive agenda and fraudulent identity will no doubt be a shockingly loud and painful inquisition further tightening the grips of hidden truth around Obama’s fragile reality.
Blind, afraid Obots, like Whoopi Goldberg, should also probably look where they are standing before the weight of Obama's lies fall on them too.
If nothing else, Trump may actually prove to be the opponent who defeats Obama in 2012, regardless if he actually runs for president or not. Just having "The Donald" on the roster should make liberals very nervous. Contrary to Obama, what does Trump have to lose?
Friday, March 18, 2011
Editor, The Daily Pen
The past few years have been a real riot. Depending on your ideological orientation, your riot of interest has stemmed from a variety of causes. Arizonans rioted against immigration reform. Iranians, Egyptians and Libyans are rioting against deranged leaders. Wisconsinites are rioting against financial accountability, and the liberal, pro-Obama media is rioting against the truth.
Now, in what can only be characterized as a thinly veiled attempt to downplay the severity of a politically fatal scenario, Barack Obama is attempting to incite laughter over his lack of proven eligibility to be president.
First, while speaking at a prayer breakfast in February 2010, Obama made light of his precarious situation by saying, "Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith. Or for that matter my citizenship."
Then, in May, 2010, Barack Obama made wise cracks about his birthplace at the White House Correspondent’s dinner. We won’t recap such ignorance.
Most recently, while speaking at a fundraising event on March 8th, 2011 in Boston, Obama tried to again make fun of the left-wing originated "birther" conspiracy questioning whether he is a natural-born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution to be president, (That’s right, the so-called “birther” movement began with Hillary Clinton’s PUMA campaign group during the 2008 primary campaigns, not Obama's political opposition).
“I think there's nothing -- there's no weakness in us trying to reach out and seeing if we can find common ground. Now, there are going to be times where we can't. I was born in Hawaii, what can I say? I mean, I just... I can't change those facts,” said Obama with his Malcolmesque grin.
Not surprisingly, the hapless quip prompted mindless laughter from the liberally oriented gallery, but a deafening silence was heard from the ranks of our military.
Unfortunately, given the looming impact that such a crime as being an illegal president would have against our national sovereignty, not to mention the affront it would be to the blood ransom paid by our active and veteran members of our military, Obama’s recent jokes are not very funny. In fact, they are quite pathetic.
One must wonder how such an undermining of a once pristine vestige would impact the spirit of our fallen soldiers throughout history. What would such a repulsive reality do to their motivation to fight for such a diminished America, today?
Obama seems to become very hyperconscious about his lack of eligibility to be president only when questions about his ability to lead during critical moments are under scrutiny.
As the Middle East explodes into a global threat and Japan melts down, it is one bad thing for Barack Obama, as a President, to appear so disinterested and detached as he has for the past week. It is, however, a disgrace that he would be so vain about his deficiencies as a legitimate leader that he would divert attention from the critical situation at hand with snips about such a disgustingly unnecessary circumstance as being an ineligible usurper after the fact.
Perhaps, instead of making a horse’s ass of himself to the whole world by trivializing the U.S. Constitution, Barack Obama should take responsibility for his identity and his fallow legitimacy by simply providing access to the original, attested, verifiable documentation about his natal history, education, travel, voting records, residency, parentage, medical history and citizenship. Then we can all sit back and yuck it up about what a joke this whole issue has actually been.
On the other hand, when your own lies entrap you, the only option you have in your vanity is to use thin jokes to cover your fear and blame of others for having the audacity to tell the obvious truth about your deception.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
An Editorial by Dan Crosby,
of The Daily Pen
Most people who have been to the beach understand the deadly risk associated with rip currents. They know its what you can't see that can kill you and that denying the existence of rip currents just because they can't be seen is very dangerous. No matter how much we desire to surf above the torrential flow, we cannot deny that this powerful and destructive force exists just inches below the surface. We all know, if we continue to play in the ocean, we might have to face the challenge of surviving the tidal grip some day because we understand that everyone has to fall...eventually.
Fox News has a problem...and it all started with the way its competition chose to deal with Obama's eligibility rip current. Fox has been pretending that the rip current does not exist, and it just fell off its surf board.
The left-wing freak show that used to be the MSNBC network could not be saved. Like a corporate media version of Carlos Estevez, MSNBC executives proclaimed they were “winning” by treading directly into the opposing force against Obama's lies and deception, while Fox gave them brutal ratings beat-downs by simply sitting on the surface and watching them drown as waves passed by. (Bilingual liberals might recognize the more politically-correct, less offensive, multicultural version of Mr. Sheen’s name). Pathetically, as the shore line of reality grows wider and more distant, MSNBC continues to drown in a tidal abyss of radical, mind altering, lap dogging, pro-liberal propaganda abuse, it actually believes that everyone else has the problem.
There is a lesson to be learned here, right? Aside from the foremost fact that Barack Obama is a liar and, quite probably, a criminal usurper, we can be confident that Fox News, the most reliable network we have, has heeded a valuable teachable moment from MSNBC’s degeneracy, right?
Unfortunately, obliviousness seems to be contagious in network media. Updated ratings and viewership metrics show that Fox News has lost approximately 25% of its core viewership since December of 2010. Such a sharp decline has grabbed the attention of media appraisers and prompted some actions to understand why. Naturally, a critical observation of the chronology of such a decline reveals the reasons.
A February, 2011 poll of cable news subscribers reveals that, of the 71% who said they normally watched Fox News for more than 15 minutes at least two days a week in 2010, nearly 200 of respondents said they had lost interests in Fox’s brand of media for two primary reasons in the past six months.
The first reason cited was that Fox refused to cover the Obama eligibility scandal which, many respondents said translated in their mind to Fox’s disregard for the importance of the Constitutional foundations of American life. Nearly 91% of Fox viewers said the Obama eligibility saga should be covered like every other news story based on the objective presentation of evidence and investigation of information without respect for ramifications against, or for, any political affiliation.
“Regardless of whether or not Fox, MSNBC or anyone else in media thinks that Obama’s eligibility is important to investigate or report on, the American people have a ‘first sense’ about the reality of these things,” says media and public relations expert, Marian Taylor.
“The Constitution is the reason we are here," she continued, "It is a document which vintage Americans understand is written in blood sacrificed for their freedom. While every other news agency in the world has disseminated outright lies, Fox has done no less damage to America’s confidence by failing in its duty to objectively and responsibly report on this matter. People just want an honest investigation. Fox acts like doing their job would be some kind of an assassination attempt or something. Its ridiculous and pathetic."
Fox has failed to grasp the meaning of such a precedent on our future. Taylor explained why the American people are turning away from those in media choosing to ignore the problem.
Truly qualified Americans see it as an insult to the historical cost of our blood-ransomed freedom to allow anyone to assume political power without being authenticated with original, traditional and authoritative documented sources which we all possess. This is not unreasonable. They are also fearful about the precedent it sets for future presidents who might have even more radical bents than Obama. How can they be stopped by the Constitution then if we won't honor the Constitution now? How can we defend against a malignancy later if we allow a benign tumor now?
The second most popular reason given was Fox’s obstinate disregard of the plight of Dr. Terry Lakin, a former active Army medical doctor and veteran commanding officer with an unblemished 18-year service record who was jailed last December following a disgraceful pro-Obama laden trial. Lakin had refused to follow deployment orders as a formal challenge against the legitimacy of Barack Obama’s legal authority over the U.S. military. Lakin continues to serve a six month sentence at Leavenworth prison and has become the preeminent martyr of Obama’s tyranny.
“The Lakin affair is just the tragic manifestation of the original problem with Obama’s covert identity,” continued Taylor, “Lakin is just the living form taken by the spirit of prevailing opposition to Obama’s obvious lack of legitimacy.”
A third most popular reason for Fox’s viewership decline was that viewers thought Fox was no different than MSNBC in its one-sided use of propaganda.
On several occasions since the election of 2008, when the controversy surrounding Obama’s ambiguous legitimacy entered America’s domain of consciousness, Fox News has refused to provide any form of responsible investigation or objective reporting on the matter. Instead, the network has included a smattering of weakly collaborated briefings which have left viewers with more questions than answers. In many cases, Fox has actually engaged the subject with the same malformed accusations as their liberal counterparts that anyone with the audacity to question Obama’s enthroned preeminence is a lunatic or, worse, a racist.
Fox News has been on the air for almost 15 years. Founded by Rupert Murdoch and associates, Fox has been successful in their attempt to overthrow the monopoly held at the time by CNN and the broadcast networks of CBS, ABC and NBC bringing a more independent and “fair and balanced” substance to America’s big liberal media complex. In 2009, the network boasted viewership in 102 million households with another 100 million viewers world-wide. Fox news remains the leading, most watched cable news network in the world and the second most viewed cable broadcast network overall behind USA Network. However, based on recent sentiment, it appears the idea of fair and balanced means countering the message of opposition rather than simply supporting viewership demands by reporting the truth.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
by Penbrook Johannson
Editor, The Daily Pen
The more Mike Huckabee talks, the more his ignorance about Barack Obama’s biography is revealed. It is one thing to commit a verbal mistake by citing wrong information about the controversially secretive past of a suspiciously seated president, but now, the former Republican Arkansas Governor says it is unimportant to enforce the legal eligibility mandates set forth in the U.S. Constitution because he is afraid it would offend Barack Obama.
Recall, during the kangaroo trial of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, pro-Obama military judge Denise Lind said that she would not allow Barack Obama to be embarrassed by the possibility of revealing that he was ineligible to be president, the U.S. Constitution be damned.
Apparently, Huckabee agrees with Lind. Just less than a week after wrongfully asserting that Barack Obama is a former resident of Kenya whose world views have been influenced by a genealogical disposition against British colonialism, Mike Huckabee has taken his lack of understanding about Obama’s covert personal history and compounded it by now proclaiming that the laws which require a president to be a natural born citizen should not be legislated, or therefore enforced because, in his view, any attempt to enforce the law would essentially offend Barack Obama.
A spokesman for Huckabee tried to excuse the original gaffe by stating that Huckabee meant to say that Obama was raised in Indonesia. However, that explanation is thin on reason because Huckabee cited the Mau Mau revolution in his reference to Obama's upbringing which occurred in Kenya, not in Indonesia. He also referenced Obama's father and grandfather, who were both Kenyan.
Although the possibility that Obama was born in Kenya still remains unproven with official documentation, he was not raised there, nor did he live there according to the shallow, but falsely accepted, narrative about his past. However, evidence strongly implies that Obama resided in Indonesia as an adopted citizen of that Muslim nation where he attended school from approximately 1967 to 1971 after his mother, Ann Dunham, married an Indonesian student. Obama then allegedly returned to Hawaii where he was apparently never repatriated as an American citizen. If it is ever shown that Obama was a citizen of Indonesia with documented proof, this would severely damage his self-proclaimed, but never proven, ambiguous eligibility status.
In an interview on March 6, 2011, with WABC radio’s Aaron Klein, Huckabee was asked if he would support legislation which forced, “…every presidential candidate” to demonstrate their natural born citizenship, as is required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
In his shocking response, Huckabee suggested that protecting Obama’s sentimentality was more critical than protecting the legal mandates of Constitutional eligibility , "For the most part, Aaron, I don't even think it's necessary. We pretty much have our biographies. The news media is going to delve into everything imaginable. I think sometimes that piece of legislation might look like a swipe at Obama.”
Despite there being no original documented evidence to prove one way or the other, Huckabee went on to say, "I don't believe Obama was born overseas, I believe he was born in Hawaii. I have no doubts about his Hawaiian birth.”
“It just keeps getting worse for poor Mike,” says media relations expert, Marian Taylor, “He just can’t seem to get his mind around the critical necessity of holding the occupier of the executive office of American government to the legal standard worthy of the prerequisites determined by the wisdom of our founders.”
The tragic dissonance in Huckabee’s failure to grasp the truth is that he is simply pandering to political forces without considering the merits of the factual evidence. Whatever those political forces owe allegiance to is irrelevant. The very fact that a high profile member of the ruling class would put political interests ahead of moral discernment is a sign of a failing national authority.
Huckabee’s blind confidence that a mythic objective media would “delve into everything imagineable” is misplaced.
“Aww. Poor wittle Obama might get his feewings hurt,” teased Taylor about Huckabee’s dissonance.
“How is that they are so spineless in their parrotry to not offend anyone that they have refused to stop them from committing crimes. Has the guy ever watched MSNBC or read the New York Times?” she quipped, in reference to Chris Matthews’ 2008 on-air orgasmic-like gush, “My God! Today’s media has demonstrated nothing less than a deranged ‘tingly feeling’ in favor of Obama since his appearance at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. This derelict media has expressed no interest in investigating the Obama eligibility myth. That would mean they would have to admit their mistake in abetting the most prolific liar in political history. They would rather burn in hell than do that.”
Left-wing media extremists, including the MSNBC fraternity, in recent days have accused Huckabee of intentionally perpetuating a conspiracy that Obama was born in Kenya when he mistated that Obama was "raised in Kenya" rather than actually saying the words: "born in Kenya", which are two significantly different circumstances with regard their respective impact on Obama's presidential eligibility. Simply residing in another country does not disqualify a presidential candidate unless they have lost their "natural born" U.S. citizenry to do so. Left-wing dregs like Chris Mattews, Ed Shultz, Larry O'Donnell and the remaining slew of MSNBC hacks, have caterwauled that Huckabee is pandering to the so-called "birthers", a faction of Obama opposition which believes Obama was not born in the U.S., with whom they have an obsessively deranged odium, despite the fact that Obama has never provided original, 1961 birth documentation to dispute this possibility.
A review of on-line comments in response to Huckabee’s recent stirring of controversy suggests that he is just an unwitting symptom of the Obama problem. Many in America feel this crisis is about a lack of authenticity in Obama’s identity and about the stratum of lies which have been disseminated by corrupt, soulless creatures, to conceal the facts about it. A large part of that authenticity is rooted in the information documented about his past, including his birth, which should, without exception, exist in the same form which any of the millions of natural-born American citizens possess. Namely, if Obama was actually born in a U.S. hospital having an administrative relationship with the local municipal Health Department, his birth records would exist in their original form as an original document with a header title, “Certificate of Live Birth”, as issued in template form by the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of Health, Welfare and Education, which is what the Department of Health was called prior to 1979.
To date, the only document provided for public review alleging Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth”, not a U.S. “Certificate of Live Birth” which is a form of identification independently published by the Hawaiian municipality since its Y2K upgrade, and which is provided for natal registrations, per HRS 338-17.8, including for births of foreign-born children whose parents claimed Hawaii as their residence up to one year prior to the birth, regardless of the actual location of the birth. This ambiguously populated document, with its sparse, limited information, has been argued as the holy grail of Obama’s legitimacy.
“Apparently, Obama is eligible to be president of Hawaii,” says Taylor sarcastically, “Unfortunately, for Obama and Mr. Huckabee, the office of the U.S. President is a federal office, not a municipal position in Hawaii. Obama supporters can’t seem to tell the difference.”
Just as it may be said that the U.S. Constitution is the “birth certificate” of America, and the Bible the “birth certificate” of mankind, each individual man and woman seeking the office of the President has original documentation commonly accepted by our longstanding, traditional federal authorities. For, if they lack such “bonafications” they cannot be President! This does not preclude their ability for civil service wholly, as a statesman or legislator, nor does it diminish their value as a contributive member of society as an upstanding legalized citizen. It just means they can’t be a natural born citizen and, therefore, cannot be president! This is the standard set forth for every man...every man, except, apparently, one Barack Obama…who, it just so happens, was allowed to circumvent these standards and be ensconced as an almost-president by a bowing liberal consensus.
“Mike Huckabee has a right to believe any lie he wants, however, the facts do not support his assertion that Obama has provided any conclusive, original, attested, legally reviewed documented facts supporting his natural born citizenship, and, more importantly, his stupid idea that anyone in today’s media would ever actually confront Obama about it.”
To date, Obama has never been compelled by anyone in media, government or the courts to ever produce official, original, documented evidence supporting the biography America has been told about him, including his original, 1961 birth documentation, his Hawaiian kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis work, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport application, passports issued, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, church baptism records allegedly purvey by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and his adoption records filed in 1965 upon his mother’s marriage to an Indonesian.
“America’s lack of character is manifesting,” says Taylor.
“The terrible, foreboding truth is that Obama is an unknown variable with no authentic identity as we know of. The very fact that he has been allowed to be President shows how far we have fallen from our responsibility to secure the authentic identity of our leadership and, therefore, our nation. He could actually be anyone with any intention and we have no way of knowing the truth about him or opposing the lies that have obviously been told,” warns Taylor.
The weight of this story is so crushing upon the collective minds of America’s political and legal class that people like Huckabee find themselves enslaved by their desire for political legitimacy in the minds of the dissonant politically-minded, rather than risk the consequences of revealing that a member of their own ruling class might actually be the most prolific political criminal in American history. Even a principled man like Mike Huckabee has been pushed by the idea of such a distasteful necessity into seeking political favor for power’s sake over his duty to uphold the highest possible standards for our elected ruling class. The impact of the precedence set by allowing rulership to a shadow figure like Obama is that we now have no justification for stopping someone more evil…and more deceptive. What’s next? How long until America be so weakened by its spineless, liberal shame and sense of entitlement to not be offended that we fail to prevent the election of a radical Muslim, posing as a Christian…with loyalties to rogue foreign influences…who was actually born in America?
“This is how great nations die,” says Taylor, “This is how the history of mankind defines the fall of civilizations. By first weakening the will of its populous with misinformation and economic hardship. Then, under the guise of righteous rescue, tyrants, despots and usurpers are allowed to confiscate power under the purveyance of lies and deception about their true identity and intentions saying they seek to remake the world. If Obama doesn’t fit this model, how can anyone say Hitler was as bad as history says he was.”
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
by Penbrook Johannson,
Editor of The Daily Pen
Is it any wonder why the leaders of this nation failed to prevent the usurpation of the power of its highest office without even verifiably qualifying the individual assuming the office? Even the members of Obama's most prolific political opposition remain lost, ignorant and, tragically, accepting about his ambiguously legitimate, but obviously radical, identity.
On Tuesday, March 01, 2011, in a New York radio interview with WOR’s Steve Maltzberg, former Republican Arkansas Governor, Mike Huckabee mistakenly, but not surprisingly, stated multiple times that Barack Obama grew up in Kenya. Huckabee seemed to be invoking this false fact in order to qualify his belief that Obama’s geographic upbringing has spurred his anti-American orientation in favor of collective internationalism.
Despite the remaining, as yet undocumented, possibility of being born in the African nation, Barack Obama did not grow up in Kenya. He grew up as an adopted citizen in the muslim nation of Indonesia until approximately 1971 when he allegedly returned to Hawaii, apparently without ever being re-naturalized as a U.S. citizen and without renouncing his Indonesian citizenship. Both of these circumstances would disqualify Obama from the office of the presidency if the Constitutional mandate were to ever be applied to him and enforced in U.S. court. However, he remains a fugitive from this standard.
Huckabee's failure to accurately recount facts about Obama’s personal history is not only a product of the vast and pathetic ignorance about the issue by our ruling class, it is the result of America’s lack of willingness to uphold the honorability of our blood-ransomed, Constitutional freedoms and right to establish the rules for American leadership eligibility.
“Mike’s misstatements are a perfect example of the willful lack of awareness about Obama’s identity,” says Marian Taylor, an expert in media accuracy with a Philly consulting agency, “It’s not as if people like the “Huckster” don’t possess the available resources to carry out the necessary investigation to get this crap right, they just simply are too cowardly to do it for fear of being politically marginalized. It makes me sad for America.”
Taylor went on to say that unless people of influence and power are willing to embrace the metrics of this issue and weigh the facts on their merit, she fears the worst for America’s future.
“Accepting plurality in our national identity is not in the best interest of our future,” she said, “we have no recourse once we have diminished that costly vestige. History has shown that when nations fail to enforce their authenticity, they become enslaved and diminished.”
In the radio interview, Huckabee was responding to Malzberg, who asked, "How come we don't have a health record, we don't have a college record, we don't have a birth certificate? Why, Mr. Obama, did you spend millions of dollars in courts all over this country to defend against having to present a birth certificate? It's one thing to say, 'You've seen it. Goodbye.' But why go to court and send lawyers to defend against having to show it? Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man?"
"I would love to know more, but what I know is troubling enough. One thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, was very different than the average American,” responded Huckabee.
Huckabee made the comments in reference to Obama’s flippant return of a sculpture of former Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, which was lent to President Bush by former Prime Minister Tony Blair after 9/11.
Huckabee went on to say about Obama’s dismissive act in returning….”the bust of Winston Churchill was a great insult to the British. But then if you think about it, his perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather, their view of the Mau Mau Revolution in Kenya is very different than ours because he probably grew up hearing that the British were a bunch of imperialists who persecuted his grandfather."
"He despises the West, he despises the Brits, and I think he can take it all out on Israel," interjected Malzberg.
As reported by WND’s Joe Kovacs, a spokesman for Huckabee later told CBS News the former governor "meant to say the president grew up in Indonesia."
"When the governor mentioned he wanted to know more about the president, he wasn't talking about the president's place of birth – the governor believes the president was born in Hawaii," Hogan Gidley told the network. "The governor would however like to know more about where President Obama's liberal policies come from and what else the president plans to do to this country – as do most Americans."
The problem with Gidley's excuse for Huckabee's gaffe is that Indonesia was a Dutch colony, not an exclusively British one like Kenya, which became an independent Muslim state in 1949, 12 years before Obama was even born. Huckabee is clearly linking Obama's world view to his association with Kenya's British colonial history, not Indonesia's. Obama's only association with Indonesia was his mother's marriage to an Indonesian.
Huckabee went on to address doubts many have about Obama's birth certificate, stating, "The only reason I'm not as confident that there's something about the birth certificate ... is because I know the Clintons and believe me, they have lots of investigators out on him, and I'm convinced if there was anything that they could have found on that, they would have found it, and I promise they would have used it."
“Huckabee’s lack of insight is common among his class. The Clinton’s are political animals subject to influence in favor of Obama even if they had knowledge about his ineligibility because it does them more harm to damage their party,” says Taylor.
"Obama will be gone someday. The democrat party will not. Damaging Obama meant killing Hilary’s chances at the White House because of her association with the party, not Obama. Bill and Hilary knew this then, and they know it now.”
It is difficult to imagine that a seasoned politician as worn as Mike Huckabee cannot possibly imagine that the Clintons, while engaged in a primary competition with Obama in 2008 would therefore actually go as far as to undermine the entire Democrat party in perpetuity with such a damaging revelation as an ineligible Democrat candidate serving as president.
“The GOP’s stupidity about this is laughable,” says Taylor, “this is a common truth for us out here in the real world. Even liberal politicians as immoral as the Clintons would suppress the truth to prevent destroying their own party. Hilary can still run for President in 2012 or, though a long shot, in 2016. People like them understand the value of the future over the value of a moment.”
Taylor’s concept is interesting. It’s hard to imagine that Huckabee actually believes that such an indictment against Obama would not damage the political reputation of any Democrat, let alone a scorned, androphobic former first-lady presidential wannabe like Hilary Clinton?
All of America’s high profile news agencies, including the Associated Press and CBS News, are falsely reporting that Obama has shown his Hawaiian birth certificate online. However, the internet image of Obama’s Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth”, also known as a short-form birth registration notification, has been diminished by the fact that this document is commonly issued to foreign born children whose parents claimed Hawaii as their residence within a year of the birth, regardless of the actual geographic location of the birth.
What many in the public have been asking to see is the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, known as a Certificate of Live Birth, which includes details such as the name of the hospital, the names of informants and the name and signature of an attending physician at the time of the birth. Obama has never produced such documentation in support of his Constitutional eligibility to be president which states that a candidate for president must be “naturally born” in a geographic location which is under the legal protections of the U.S. Constitution to two U.S. citizen parents.
Many challengers of Obama’s eligibility rightfully argue that Obama was never eligible, regardless of his birthplace, because his alleged father, Barack Obama Sr., was never a U.S. citizen. This argument is based on the content of original documentation and writings by the framers of our founding doctrine who applied the language to the writing of the Constitution and, therefore, Article II governing the eligibility of presidents.