ROMNEY FIRES BIRTH CERTIFICATE “TEST MISSILE” AND HITS TARGET

OBOTS GNASHING THEIR TEETH – Resounding approval from a Michigan campaign rally crowd following comments by Mitt Romney about his birth certificate reveals that the truth is on his side when it comes to challenging the prolific lies about Obama’s identity and eligibility to be president.  Most importantly, the applause demonstrated to Romney that he has at his disposal the most destructive arsenal of political weaponry ever held against a political opponent in American history...and that he has permission to use those weapons without apologies for the sake of America’s future.   

By Dan Crosby

of The Daily Pen

NEW YORK, NY - Mitt Romney just “went nuclear” in the 2012 President campaign. 

Speaking at a Detroit-suburb rally, Romney told a crowd of 10,000 that he and his wife were happy to be back in the state of their childhood home when he fired a “test missile” at Barack Obama’s failure to demonstrate his Natural Born eligibility to be president.  

“No one has ever asked to see my birth certificate…they know this is the place that we were born and raised,” Romney said. 

The remark received a resounding applause because the crowd understood it was in reference to evidence discovered over the past five years that Obama is ineligible to be president because he has failed to demonstrate his natural born citizenship.  Regardless of Obama’s birth place, however, which has never been proven with authentic original documentation, his alleged father, Barack Obama Sr., was never a U.S. citizen.   

The governor has always said, and has repeatedly said, he believes the president was born here in the United States,” Romney advisor Kevin Madden said. “He was only referencing that Michigan, where he is campaigning today, is the state where he himself was born and raised.”

Madden's comments were made without citing a single source of evidence to support the claim that Romney believes Obama is native born.  His comments are also irrelevant to the question of Obama's eligibility because the citizenship of Obama's documented father disqualifies him as a candidate, regardless of his birthplace. 

A natural born U.S. citizen is one born in the U.S. to two citizen parents. 

In order to protect the sovereignty of the U.S. Constitution from foreign usurpation, America's founders mandated that the office of the president, along with the Vice President, must be held by natural born citizens only.  No other office requires the prerequisite because no other office has authority over the military and its weaponry.     

Questions about Obama's place of birth merely address one of three unresolved issues plaguing the authenticity of Obama's identity. 

Questions have also been raised about whether Obama is lying about the identity of his real father in order to hide his un-American beliefs and his neo-communist agenda.  Evidence about Obama’s past, including his childhood and college years, shows that he holds radical communist views and hatred toward, not only vintage American heritage, but white people in general.  Obama has long been suspected of harboring a deep seated anger and being motivated by a long held desire for vengeance against what he sees as the injustices of colonialism and economic supremacy by nonmelanic cultures.       

After the video of Romney’s remarks were posted on YouTube, liberal operatives began firing emails to one another organizing a group effort to descend on the site and post “dislike” ratings and criticism toward Romney.  Site statistics shows that videos of Romney's remarks are receiving a disproportionate number of responses compared with other posts. 

Unlike Barack Obama, Mitt Romney is a natural born citizen of the United States because he was born in the U.S. to two citizen parents.  Therefore, Romney is eligible to be a presidential candidate under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico but became a naturalized citizen of the U.S. prior to Romney’s birth in Michigan while Romney’s mother has always been a U.S. citizen.    

Romney has never attempted to hide documentation alluding to his constitutional eligibility like Obama has.

Hawaii officials have repeatedly refused to verify the existence of, or authenticate content in, Obama’s original birth certificate which they claim is on file in that state’s Health Department.  Explicit requests for the original paper documentation of Obama’s alleged birth in Hawaii have been denied by officials which raises doubts that an original document even exists.   

In response to pervasive questions about Obama’s birth in April 2011, document forgers working on behalf of Obama posted to an official government website what has since been proven by a law enforcement investigation to be a digitally fabricated computer image of an alleged 1961 birth certificate.  The criminals have yet to be indentified.

An image of Obama’s alleged 1980 selective service registration card has also been shown to be a forgery.  Maricopa County law enforcement officials showed that the card is only one of millions ever processed by the postal service using a two-digit year receipt stamp, while all others submitted have always been stamped with a four-digit year stamp.  The card also shows that Obama allegedly signed it a day AFTER it was stamped which would make the signature invalid because a postal worker must witness the indivual signing the card before stamping it.  

Investigators suspect the document was forged for Obama because he never registered for selective service.  Failure to do so would disqualify him from being president.      

Judges in the U.S. are also hiding from the issue of Obama’s eligibility, refusing to review any of nearly 130 lawsuits on the merits of the actual evidence, fearing the discovery of the evidence would show that Obama is actually a fraud and liar.  Essentially judges have cowered to political fears, dismissing the cases based on a false argument that plaintiffs don’t have standing.  No case yet has been allowed to move forward on discovery of evidence, let alone been examined under an actual legal argument citing precedent.    

Of course, a frightened Obama campaign desperately tried to deflect reaction to the remark, saying Romney was embracing "the most strident voices in his party instead of standing up to them."

Obama's campaign apparently fails to realize that Romney does not have the power to stand against the truth.