In the ongoing investigation into Barack Obama’s identity, Dr. Alan Keyes continues to courageously protest the authenticity of the newly installed president’s eligibility for public service. In the absence of fundamental and basic information about his identity, Obama remains unwilling to offer any answers to questions about his right to serve in, not only his currently assumed position as acting president of the United States, but in any American political office at all.
Evident from yet another of many liberal media misrepresentations of the issue, the defunct L.A. Times presented a load of factless blather about Mr. Keyes’ current sortie against the Obama fraud. Among several misconstruents, The Times parrots, with absurd insistence, that the Certificate Of Life Birth, previously presented as a scanned image on no less than three notoriously liberal websites, and since proven a forgery, remains sufficient for Obama to receive the approval stamp of eligibility of America.
Also, consistent with its conceptual deficiencies, the Times proceeded to disregard truth by misquoting the Constitution, attempting to shoot a pro-Obama plug under the radar as an acceptable comparison between Obama's claims of being an “American citizen” and the Constitution’s actual prescription that any president MUST be a “Natural Born Citizen”.
The L.A. Times, like many of its incestuously assembled, nepotistic cohorts in print media, would prefer these distinctions are not brought to light in order that they might perpetuate their gross deceptions that Obama’s current citizenship is sufficient to be the President, as though Obama’s status as an American citizen was the issue in play here. Though the liberal media may wish it so, his current citizenship status is not in question, his NATURAL BORN STATUS is.
The issue is, and will forever remain, whether or not the man was a born within the constitutionally defined clarifications, based on crucial and necessary protections of American sovereignty, and how that birthright affects his eligibility to be a U.S. president.
Obama’s current citizenship status is irrelevant to the questions of his eligibility to be president. Other questions about his eligibility to hold office as a state senator, on the other hand, might be prompted by the Times’ story, though. For example, the current governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is an American citizen. He is not a natural born citizen. He is not eligible to serve as president under current constitutional law.
The U.S. Constitution prescribes wonderful and enlightening guidance. But it does NOT only say "a president must be born an American citizen", as the L.A Times, and most pro-Obama media puppets exploit in their pathetic attempt to downplay the reality of Obama's ominous identity issues. But, most mainstream media establishments are far too market-drunk to discern these significant, maligned differences.
More correctly, the Constitution states that a president must be a "natural born citizen", not only an American citizen.
The founding fathers were as right then, as they are today. The standard bears upon the current invaders of our sovereign nation and confronts them with the truth about their fraudulent implements.
Therefore, in the wake of Obama’s intentional unwillingness to be transparent, Keyes’ indictments of his lack of disclosure are appropriate. Obama’s hollow biography is only the first of a slew of insurmountable suspicions that Americans have about this man of many obscurities, and his narrow, invasive ideology.
Whether intentional or passive, Liberal’s ignorance on the matter of constitutional eligibility is not surprising. The leftist horde was too politically orphaned and morally desolate to care about playing by the rules. And, as such, they were unable to find legitimate candidacy among advanced persons. Driven by their blind, hysterical support for anyone, foreign or domestic, who remotely resembles the liberal image of their beholding, it is plausible to consider they would have voted for a confirmed serial killer had he ran for office against the incumbent.
Obama’s failure to appoint several cabinet members because of criminal behavior should serve as diagnostics when evaluating his own integrity. Tax evasion, violations of constitutional eligibility law and bribery are only gateway offenses serving the intentions of the liberal establishment. And, now, the truly valid of our vintage nation suffer most from the misfortunate appointment of a man contrived in such blatant “otherness”.
Unfortunately, the ascendance of such an obscure, media promoted personality as Obama, is the best they could do to counter the manifest context of the previous administration. The rank motivation democrats cite as justification for installing the current usurper falls summarily between the lines of willful misinterpretation of black history and a psychotic lust for redemption for jilted liberals still full of blind, rabid hatelust for George Bush.
Whether or not Obama is a natural born citizen is yet to be clarified. And, this is the terrible dilemma.
What if he is not who even the liberals think he is? What does that mean for those of us in the "I told you so" know. If the inmates even know the warden is crooked, how do the rest of us justify the system?
Posthumously, Americans can assume that, until his eligibility is clarified by an official, non-partisan review of his historical, residential, immigration, education and voting records, Mr. Obama is merely a character participating in a pretend presidency on behalf of the liberal establishment, and the Democrat-ran Congress.
We all remember the commission of our fathers when they taught us that remaining silent when the truth is demanded is the same as lying.
But, then again, Obama never knew his father, or ours.
Dr. Keyes is only one of millions of Americans who have valid, justified and unanswered questions about the authenticity of Obama's identity. Failure to recognize this fact on the part of the liberal media, democrats and cowardice apologists, is one of the primary factors in the imminent decline in credibility of this so-called authentic, transparent man of change.