INCOME IS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT: Mitt Romney’s political popularity with a handful of middleclass moderates could be impacted this November by his decision whether or not to disclose his income by way of tax returns, which he should provide unapologetically. However, it is his campaign’s abysmal weakness and incompetent unwillingness to gut the “Obotic” horde with the message that the difference between Romney’s tax returns and Obama’s birth certificate is that the content of the latter is evidence of Natural Born Constitutional eligibility to even hold the office while the other is merely a political joystick gladhanded by a deranged political subspecies, which will ultimately cause his downfall.
Commentary by Penbrook Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
NEW YORK, NY – The left has a delusional fantasy about the equivalency between the rule of law and political popularity. They actually believe Obama’s transient preciousness legally qualifies him to be President over the 225-year authority of the blood ransomed U.S. Constitution, which illustrates the depth of their psychosis founded upon Romney's lack of income disclosure. Yet they appear dissonant about Obama's document forgery, identity fraud and his lack of legal qualifications to even hold the office.
The Constitutional eligibility mandate found in Article II is a unique legal requirement among civilized nations. In terms of a candidate’s demographics, our founders ruled that Presidential candidates must be able to demonstrate that they are Natural-Born citizens and 35 years of age in order to hold the office. These two bits of information are most commonly evidenced by a valid, original, standard record of birth which can be easily and openly corroborated with other biographical and official records.
Romney haters have convinced themselves that, in order to equalize the illegitimacy universe with Obama's lack of Constitutional eligibility, Article II eligibility is now determinable by a tax return. However, there is some bad news for Obots. Unfortunately, the IRS does not care if you are natural born citizen or an illegal migrant worker. Taxes are taxes and, apparently, Romney has broken no laws...like Obama has.
In fact, Romney gives almost 15 percent above of his income tax to his church charity…which should delight the entitlement minded. It’s free money from a rich, white, latter day Christian Republican! (yes, Mormons are a version of Christians…with an extra chromosome, but loved nonetheless.) Do we dare ask what Obama gives to charity in comparison? Should we wonder if Obama ever squared that little tax issue when he bought property from a known felon and slum lord? Speaking of taxes...do we dare simply mention the names Geitner, Rangle or Dodd?
All this political "ammo" and Romney doesn't understand his right to bear legal "arms" against the illegitimate criminal syndicate.
A Natural Born citizen is one born under the definition established by what the founders understood as “Natural Laws”, not the tax code. A set of long-established legal, biological, moral and socially rooted tenets held by advanced civilization which, when measured against a person’s jurisdiction of birth and biological parentage, make it impossible for him or her to have plural allegiances with foreign influences. Simply understood today, this means they are born in the United States to two citizen parents without a discontinuance of that Natural born citizenship status from birth to election.
Only a president must be natural born. No other position in American society requires this, yet the president is no more endowed with Constitutional rights than any other citizen of the U.S., natural born or not. This mandate was enacted to protect American sovereignty, not discriminate against race.
No presidential candidate has ever been under as much scrutiny over his lack of ability to demonstrate Constitutional eligibility than Barack Hussein Obama. This is because no other presidential candidate has ever tried as hard, or paid as much, to hide his lack of Constitutional eligibility as much as Barack Obama.
We didn’t ask the Bushi, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter or even the first Naturally born required candidate, John Tyler (born two years after the ratification of the Constitution) for their proof of natural born citizenship because, 1.) they didn’t try to hide it like Obama, 2.) their family histories were never legally doubted or publicly questioned, (even by our psychopathic liberal media), like Obama 3.) they never paid a dime in legal fees to suppress their birth records like Obama and finally, 4.) no one ever forged a computer image of a 50-year-old document for them and got caught by a law enforcement agency after posting it to an official, tax payer funded government media source…like Obama. So, stop with the racism crap. Wasn't Bill Clinton the first black president, anyway?
Yet, Romney’s tax returns are the rage among liberals and media. Can they really not see what fools they have become? At the conclusion of Sheriff Arpaio’s recent press conference, pro-Obama letches posing as reporters demonstrated absolutely no interest in evidence discovered from a 10-month law enforcement investigation that the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth”, proving it a forgery. A source of alleged official vital information about the man occupying the office of the United States presidency has been proven by criminal forensics to be forgery and the media were questioning the investigators about THEIR qualifications, not Obama’s.
The apocalypse is upon us, my vintage American friends.
Romney should release every tax return he has filed since 1990 just to force the left to read them all. They won’t read a 2700-page socialist healthcare bill, but I bet they would devour those 7000 pages of Romney’s tax returns. They would eat their own children to remain at that task.
Let’s make this simple. When the left demands that Romney should reveal tax records, which have no bearing on Article II's eligibility to be President, like Obama's forged birth certificate does, Romney should simply say, “…when Obama releases the records which demonstrate his legal qualifications to be the president, I will be happy to release tax records which will never change the fact that you would never vote me anyway.”
Romney may be successful and rich like Obama. But the most teeth gnashing fact that liberal's can't claim about Obama is that Romney has never been proven to be an illegal president by a law enforcement agency...yet.