From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Friday, November 16, 2012

MEDIA “BALDFACE” LIES ABOUT PATRAEUS TESTIMONY TO DEFEND OBAMA’S BENGHAZI FAILURE


THE 1st AMENDMENT WAS MURDERED IN BENGHAZI TOO - Earlier this week, in an astonishing admission of dereliction during an interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan, ABC News Senior White House Correspondent, Jake Tapper, blamed the failure of the mainstream media to cover the Benghazi story before the election on “intense politicization” of the story, saying that it was because of “republican conspiracy theories” that made it impossible for he and the leftist, pro-Obama media to do its job.  Tapper also said that one of the reasons the leftist media was guilty of journalistic malpractice in covering the murder of four Americans by terrorists was because they “didn’t want to interfere with the Obama Administrations positive narrative about Al Qaeda”.

Now, AP Columnists Kim Dozier and Nedra Pickler have published an insidious and deceptive story claiming that the reason Obama and members of his administration were justified in lying to the American people about the Benghazi attack was because he was attempting to implement a covert response against the terrorists and did not want to, in their words, “tip them off” to his retaliatory plans.
 
By Dan Crosby
of the Daily Pen
 
NEW YORK, NY - The re-election of Barack Obama and defense of his illegitimate executive power has become more important than protecting the lives of innocent Americans, according the liberal mainstream media. Defending Obama’s lies in order to see him achieve his liberal aspirations was more important than protecting American security and providing the truth about the September 11 murder of four innocent Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, at the hands of terrorist enemies in Benghazi, Libya.
 
Despite former CIA director David Petraeus' testimony in closed hearings Friday that he has always believed the September 11 attack on a U.S. mission complex in Benghazi, Libya, was an act of terrorism and that it was not a result of a spontaneous demonstration, Obama’s media defenders are toiling to provide excuses for Obama’s failures to respond as well as his outright lies that the attack was the result of a YouTube video. 
 
Intelligence reports also show that Patraeus’ agency actually named specific terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda, as those responsible for the attack in its initial reports sent to the Obama administration during and immediately following the attack. 
It has since been discovered, however, that the content of those reports were altered by unnamed personnel in the Obama administration in order to omit references to specific terrorist groups and implications that the attack was anything other than a spontaneous protest over the YouTube video, which at least five high ranking members of the Obama Administration explicitly blamed for the attack, including Barack Obama, himself.
 
Investigators believe the Obama administration removed references to terrorist groups prior to the election in order to convey a positive public narrative about Obama’s success against Al-Qaeda after exaggerating his own role in the alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden in May, 2011.     
 
However, the ultra-liberal media has once again been caught altering facts and telling blatant lies in its coverage of the content of testimony given to congress by Patraeus.  In an article published on November 16, Associated Press columnists, Kim Dozier and Nedra Pickler wrote the following:
 
“Ex-CIA Director David Petraeus told lawmakers Friday that classified intelligence showed the deadly raid on the U.S. Consulate in Libya was a terrorist attack, but that the administration withheld the suspected role of specific al-Qaida affiliates to avoid tipping off the terrorist groups.”
 
The latter half of this paragraph is a lie.  An originally published story before Dozier’s and Pickler’s shows that General Patraeus made no such statement about what he believed were the reasons for why the Obama administration lied about the circumstances surrounding the Benghazi attack or why the official CIA reports released just hours after the attack were altered.  Dozier and Pickler simply made that part up.  They continued:
“The recently resigned spy chief explained that references to terrorist groups suspected of carrying out the violence were removed from the public explanation of what caused the attack so as not to tip off the groups that the U.S. intelligence community was on their trail, according to lawmakers who attended the private briefings.
Again, Dozier and Pickler invent facts to suit the pro-Obama narrative.  The actual released story originally published from reliable media sources appeared as follows: 
"WASHINGTON -- Ex-CIA Director David Petraeus told lawmakers during private hearings Friday that he believed all along that the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya was a terrorist strike, even though that wasn't how the Obama administration initially described it publicly.
The retired four-star general addressed the House and Senate intelligence committees as questions continue to persist over what the Obama administration knew in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks and why their public description did not match intelligence agencies' assessments.
Lawmakers said Petraeus testified that the CIA's draft talking points written in response to the assault on the diplomat post in Benghazi that killed four Americans referred to it as a terrorist attack. But Petraeus told the lawmakers that reference was removed from the final version, although he wasn't sure which federal agency took out the reference.
Democrats said Petraeus made it clear the change was not made for political reasons during President Barack Obama's re-election campaign."
Notice, at no point in the original version of the AP story does it mention anything about the Obama administration changing CIA intelligence reports in order to avoid “tipping off” the terrorists.  Patraeus made no such statement about the reasons for changing the reports because there is no way for him to know why the original CIA reports on the attack were altered by anyone in the administration. 
Earlier this week, in an astonishing admission of dereliction during an interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan, ABC News Senior White House Correspondent, Jake Tapper, blamed the failure of the mainstream media to cover the Benghazi story before the election on “intense politicization” of the story, saying that it was because of “republican conspiracy theories” that made it impossible for he and the leftist, pro-Obama media to do its job.
That’s right, a member of one of the largest and long standing media organizations in America blamed politicians for his failure to do his job.  According to Tapper, the government now rules over the “free press” in America.  No more truth will be spoken against our government’s lust for power.  The pursuit of truth is officially dead among the American press.      
Essentially, Tapper admitted that the 1st Amendment is dead.  He believes that journalists in his organization, as well as all of the press, are willing to allow the government to dictate which stories are newsworthy to the media based on political ideology.  He admitted that political interests and selfish dominion of power by politicians are being permitted to rule over the media and that he and his colleagues were helpless to provide any information or facts about the Benghazi tragedy in any viable manner, whatsoever.   

 
Shockingly, Tapper also said that one of the reasons the leftist media was guilty of journalistic malpractice in covering the murder of four Americans by terrorists was because they “didn’t want to interfere with the Obama Administrations positive narrative about Al Qaeda”.

 
He actually admitted that the despicable letches in our press were less willing to provide critical information about what our government was doing about terrorist attacks against Americans than help a radical regime and bowing liberal consensus achieve an electoral orgasm.
 
Let’s hope Tapper and his delusional band are proud of their accomplishment.  Obama’s re-election cost the lives of four innocent Americans and blood of countless others.   Good job. 
   
 
In their pathetic defense of the Obama Administration, Dozier and Pickler claim that the Obama administration was justified in lying about the identity of those responsible for the Benghazi attack because it did not want those same terrorists to know that the Obama Administration knew it was them.  Therefore, says Dozier and Pickler, the Obama administration chose to tell the world a lie claiming the attack and Obama’s failed response, which resulted in the murder of four innocent Americans, was the result a protest by offended Muslims over an obscure YouTube video.
 
 
However, in their placatory misinformation, Dozier and Pickler fail to explain two events not covered by Patraeaus’ testimony, which proves that the Obama administration intentionally lied about the Benghazi attack in order to protect Obama’s retention of executive power leading up to the 2012 election. 

 
By their false account, the lies told by the Obama administration about Benghazi were so justified and intellectually elaborate that the calculated deception actually required the unwarranted arrest and terrorization of an innocent American, based on trumped up charges.
 
In defending Obama’s lies, Dozier and Pickler fail to describe the reasons why, upon blaming an obscure YouTube video, the Obama administration then also felt it was necessary to go sin-sniffing and actually imprison the alleged film maker, Mark Basseley Youssef.  Apparently, according to these two liars, this extension of the Obama deception was so sophisticated that it was a required part of “not tipping off “ the terrorists that the administration was on to them.
 
 
If Dozier and Pickler had done their job as journalist instead of allowing their deranged ideological lusts to control their perspective, they would have discovered that US District Judge Christina Snyder dropped half the minor charges against Youssef before finding him guilty on even lesser charges of violating his parole and using an alias!  That’s right…when all was said and done, after all the destruction Youssef allegedly caused with his “offensive and disgusting” video in Benghazi, resulting in the murder of four Americans, he was convicted of the “capital offense” of using an alias! 
 
Youssef was not arrested for parole violations.  The fact is, these leftist liars didn’t even consider that the Obama administration sought to arrest Youssef, using the video as an excuse, in order to uphold Obama’s lies to the American people, not implement a covert response to the terrorists. 
   
Steven Seiden, Youssef’s lawyer said after trial, “All sides accepted that none of the charges had anything to do with the anti-Muslim content of the film.”
 
Seidens account seems to suggest that his client was arrested as part of scheme by the Obama administration to hide the fact that a terrorist group was responsible for the Benghazi attack.   
 
Had they done their job correctly, Dozier and Pickler would have also discovered there has been no explanation to the public about any specific violations by Youssef or which terms of his alleged probation he actually violated, or what the terms of his original probation actually were.  As far as the public knows, Youssef could have been arrested for jaywalking, a charge which federal authorities were able to then trump into a probation violation at the behest of Obama lap dog Attorney General, Eric Holder. 
 
According to Randy Kreider of ABC News, "Officials stressed during court proceedings that the movie's contents and impact had no bearing on Youssef's case.  After a prosecutor said 'he's not here because of the content of the movie,' the judge agreed.”
 
Then why was Youssef arrested?  What evidence did authorities have to file charges before the arrest and what were those charges?
 

TERRORISTS:  WE DID IT, BUT DON’T TELL OBAMA


But, the biggest lie Dozier and Pickler tell is that the terrorists were on the run and hiding from a heroic Obama superhero after the attack, yet they refuse to acknowledge that same superhero's failure to prevent attacks in the month before despite having mountains of warnings, intel reports and requests for additional security. 

According to Dozier and Pickler, no action or lie by the Obama administration thus far is punishable because, in their absurd view, the terrorists might have become wise to the fact that they were found out by the very same government and intelligence personnel they had attacked?

The problem with this excuse is that the terrorists, themselves, admitted to the attack by posting a confession on a worldwide social media site, Facebook, within 24 hours. 
 
Maybe Dozier and Pickler thought that since the terrorists didn’t “friend” Obama, they might be able to hide their murderous deeds amidst a billion teenagers and fraternity pledges.  Or, maybe Dozier and Pickler believed Secretary of State Clinton when she weaseled off that something posted on the internet is not proof of anything.
 
Or, maybe these idiots thought the terrorists posted on Facebook, “We did it…but don’t tell Obama.” 
 
In lying to protect Obama, Dozier and Pickler failed to realize the preeminent fact that the terrorists were never worried about being discovered because they publicly admitted to the attack immediately.  Therefore, there is no reason for the  Obama administration to think its response should be hidden from a terrorist group that already publicly admitted to the world that it was responsible for murdering Ambassador Stevens and three U.S. diplomat personnel.

In the end, the fact is that Obama, in his corrupt leftist ideology, wanted to be re-elected without the American people having the chance to find out the truth about his failure to prevent the deaths of four Americans at the hands of the very same terrorists he claims to have defeated long ago.

Now, he can sleep in the White House every night knowing he had the ability to save Americans and he intentionally allowed them to die because of his lust for power.

We don't know about the terrorists...but Americans are on to him.       

5 comments:

  1. Bigot, and hate-monger: Read, and inform yourself. And turn off Faux News. There was never any denial of terrorist involvement; just a prudent and cautious delay for FACTS. Foreign concept, I know...
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/benghazi.asp

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Todd you f..k.g ignoramous!!! Where the hell do you see any biggoted hate mongering in the above article!?! Are you insane!?! Please show me the hate mongering!?! Did the author claim that Obama lied because he is 1/4 Black and 1/4 Arab Muslim!?! While Obama IS 1/4 Black, and is 1/4 Arab Muslim [Yes I know that Muslim is follower of the religion ISLAM, NOT a race!] I am sure his being 1/4 black had nothing to do with his decision, and I can only guess the author would agree because based on the language, tone, and content of the article it seems he would NOT be shy if he believed his [Obama's] being 1/4 black had anything to do with it. One would have to be an ignoramous like yourself to NOT believe his being 1/4 Arab Muslim had NOTHING to do with his behaviour here. Of course you being and idiot would say: "Hey, theres the hate mongering I waa talking about, he is labeling peace loving Arab Muslims as evil!". Of course the author did NOT even suggest or hint at that obvious fact I DID!!! So where even with your twisted FAR LEFT FACIST Ideology can you come to the conclusion the author is biggoted or hateful!?! Every statement he made, he provides facts to prove them. He clearly pointed out the media lies were just that [LIES] with verifiable FACTS. Can a non educated MORON like yourself prove any of his facts wrong? If so please do [prove his facts wrong]!

      Then prove your thesis about his hateful biggotry. If you can't do either, please pour a half cup of battery acid (30% Sulfuric acid 70% Distilled water) in your mouth gargle for one minute and spit it out. Then put both hands one at a time down the garbage disposal so that you can no longer invibe the planet with your stupidity verbally or through the pen!

      Delete
    2. Whatever happened to the good old days.....remember when americans would have formed a mob and drug these lying liberals out of their homes by the head of their hair and hung them from the nearest tree? That was when right was right and wrong was wrong and we did not tolerate for a moment anti americanism. That was before we became so tolerant and open minded that our brains started falling out. That was when we were proud to be the courageous and innovative people that we were. We were Americans! And now we are just another cowardly european country who panders to everyone, even those who would do us harm. Ah, the good old days. I have a great tree in my front yard if we decide, once again, to stop tolerating those who would conform the greatest nation there ever was to look just like the rest of the sorry world. If we decide that no apologies are necessary for allowing american citizens to fulfill their dreams of greatness.

      Delete
  2. Snopes....? The same ideological husband and wife duo who have lied repeatedly to cover O's @$$? Todd, when you finally grow up and buy your own home (instead of dwelling in Mom and Daddy's basement) come back here and comment with some REAL information. PLEASE, quit smoking that loco stuff in your bong, and quit visiting snopes. You'll NEVER get any reliable news there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Todd you f..k.g ignoramous!!! Where the hell do you see any biggoted hate mongering in the above article!?! Are you insane!?! Please show me the hate mongering!?! Did the author claim that Obama lied because he is 1/4 Black and 1/4 Arab Muslim!?! While Obama IS 1/4 Black, and is 1/4 Arab Muslim [Yes I know that Muslim is follower of the religion ISLAM, NOT a race!] I am sure his being 1/4 black had nothing to do with his decision, and I can only guess the author would agree because based on the language, tone, and content of the article it seems he would NOT be shy if he believed his [Obama's] being 1/4 black had anything to do with it. One would have to be an ignoramous like yourself to NOT believe his being 1/4 Arab Muslim had NOTHING to do with his behaviour here. Of course you being and idiot would say: "Hey, theres the hate mongering I waa talking about, he is labeling peace loving Arab Muslims as evil!". Of course the author did NOT even suggest or hint at that obvious fact I DID!!! So where even with your twisted FAR LEFT FACIST Ideology can you come to the conclusion the author is biggoted or hateful!?! Every statement he made, he provides facts to prove them. He clearly pointed out the media lies were just that [LIES] with verifiable FACTS. Can a non educated MORON like yourself prove any of his facts wrong? If so please do [prove his facts wrong]!

    Then prove your thesis about his hateful biggotry. If you can't do either, please pour a half cup of battery acid (30% Sulfuric acid 70% Distilled water) in your mouth gargle for one minute and spit it out. Then put both hands one at a time down the garbage disposal so that you can no longer invibe the planet with your stupidity verbally or through the pen!

    ReplyDelete