Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is an American hero. His honor and decorated service serve as a light of real hope and much needed change in his righteous pursuit of truth about the covert natal identity and legitimacy of Barack Obama.
Lakin, unlike some renting America today, understands the value in upholding and protecting the sovereignty of the U.S. Constitution, to which he took an oath of loyalty forsaking all enemies, foreign...and domestic.
Despite being denied his legal right to obtain of a mountain of existing evidence and testimony which would exonerate him, Lakin has chosen to forego the preliminary hearing process prior to his court martial and proceed directly to trial. It is through this noble process which Lakin has placed the fate of his 20 year career in the military as a decorated medical officer with multiple tours in combat theatre. Acting with undaunted courage and honor, Lakin is taking up a fight against possible infiltrators at the highest levels of America's leadership hierarchy. Lakin understands, like many other vintage Americans, that if we fail to maintain the integrity of our natural-born legitimacy, as a nation and through our leadership, bearing upon the founder's commissions to remain unified in our Constitutional sovereignty as a hope for the world, we open ourselves to the failed pluralities of lesser governance intruding from all manner of remoteness and internationalism.
If it is ever said of Obama that he was treated unfairly, as a man of ambiguity or "otherness", let us never forget that these sentiments were brought upon him as products of his fault, alone. His lack of transparency, his lack of honesty and his lack of disclosure have worked to poison his legitimacy and undermine his patriotism. By these acts alone, Obama is guilty.
Vintage Americans seek the true, full identity of Obama driven not by opposition to his biracial demography, but rather by his lack of demonstrated character as a principled representative of America's independently conservative heritage. Vintage Americans are born with a genealogical predisposition against inauthenticity. They contain the blood of patriots, surging through the passions of a wrought conviction for freedom.
Terry Lakin is a direct descendant of that conviction. If his cause fails, America is truly in peril. Then again, perhaps this is what liars and usurpers deserve.
We pray for Lt. Col. Lakin, as we pray for all brave warriors in service of this nation. We will continue to support his battle against America's enemies in every way possible.
In response to recent misinformation broadcasted through primary media resources, we have composed the following letter to Bill O'reilly following his lackluster embrace of the facts in Lt. Col. Lakin's saga. The following was composed some weeks ago but it remains forever true:
Dear Mr. O'reilly,
Within the spectrum of today’s media resources there are many options encompassing all points of the ideological realm. We prefer your presentation because we have always believed that you are fair-minded and highly pragmatic. Your professionalism and manner of analysis has always inspired our confidence.
Writing this letter is difficult. My family and I have watched the O’Reilly Factor for the entire 12+ years you have been on Fox. We also enjoyed your radio show during its run.
Like you and your family, we are vintage Americans. For 9 generations, my family has produced more than 250 veterans. I am currently one of 235 living grandchildren descending from
Unfortunately, Bill, we are very disappointed in the manner by which you have chosen to address the matter of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin and his courageous stance against the ambiguity of Barack Obama’s Constitutional eligibility. While we understand the reasons you are not willing to present this controversial subject in a formal “on-air” format, it does great injustice to the choice of this honorable man to broadcast mere snippets of information about him which do not explore the deepest truths regarding this matter.
Case in point, we are certain you have received many correspondences in reaction to your claim that your acquisition of two birth announcements from Hawaii proves Obama was born there. In all the years of our patronage, we have never had a reason to question your credibility on any single issue. However, after 3 years of extensive research, and a subsequent 600 page report, we must take a contentious view with your misunderstanding of this matter, which is but one small fraction of the overall evidence continuing to mount against Obama. Unfortunately, you are simply wrong about the validity of the birth announcements in their capacity to prove birth location.
Based on this evidence it is our conclusion that there are two possible reasons supporting doubts about Obama's legitimacy. Hidden documents either contain aversive information about his geographic natal history, or they contain politically damaging information about his demographics (religion, parentage, race, given name at birth, etc.), which could lead to a cascade of consequences to his presidency.
Specifically, our research revealed several undeniable facts which directly contradict your conclusions about the announcements, however.
First, the announcements are published by the newspapers from information provided exclusively from the Hawaiian Office of Vital Statistics, not a private third party. The editors of both papers are quoted, on record with our staff, as stating that their information used for the publication of vital events is provided by the Hawaiian agency. This means that the information contained in the announcements is subject to the independent processes and formats of natal documentation approved within the confidential procedures of the municipality, unknown by the public.
Second, a comparison of all birth announcements in both papers throughout the month of August, 1961, shows they are all published in the same non-alphabetical order, in the same exact quantity, in the same context between the two papers. Despite the occurrence of 1040 illegitimate births in Hawaii in 1961, the newspapers show all parents as married and living at the same address. Also, the location of the birth is not published. Only the address of the parent's alleged residence is given. These facts undermine conclusions that the announcements provide reliable information about any birth.
Third, the order of publication is based on a “birth list” compiled by the agency. The order of births in this list is based on the registration location (see 1961 NVSD Report: Volume 1, Section 5), not the date of reception by the agency. The registration number also reflects this geographically-based registration locale. Notice that Obama's birth registration is out of sequence in comparison to other births allegedly occurring at the same time, in the same medical facility. Therefore, the fact that Obama’s alleged announcements appear in any newspaper is in no way proof of his birth location. It simply means that a registration for his birth was filed with the Hawaiian Department of Health some time after his birth, somewhere, and that information was conveyed to the Hawaiian Office of Vital Statistics which then created a birth list for the newspapers.
Fourth, a deeper analysis of this municipal agency reveals that the state of Hawaii issues “birth lists” based on birth registration records, not documentation of medically verified "live" birth events or their locations. The NVSD Report explicitly states that in order for a birth certificate to be authentic it must be signed by a licensed professional qualified to the determine the characteristics of a "live" birth. Obama's Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth contains no such affixation. This is why the NVSD produced the common document template specifically titled a "Certificate of Live Birth". It originates in 1915 when still births were falsly accounted with the new census creating artificial increases in migrant populations. Birth lists, however, are compiled from a registration docket, not original, official birth records forwarded by doctors, hospitals or birth attendants to the Department of Health.
Finally, a birth may occur anywhere and be registered within the state of Hawaii as long as the parents, or applicant for a birth certificate, provides evidence to the director of the department of Health that they were residents of Hawaii within a year of the birth, regardless of the birth’s location (See HRS 338-17.8, 338-5, 338-17.7). We know at least one of Obama’s parents were residents in Hawaii at any one time from the Summer of 1959 until September of 1961. This qualifies Obama to apply for and receive a Hawaiian approved Birth Certificate, by law, regardless of his actual birth place.
Unfortunately, none of these facts prove that Obama is Constitutionally eligible to serve as a President of the U.S. It is this foundation upon which Mr. Lakin seeks verification, and he is more than justified in doing so on behalf of the sacrifice made throughout the long history of my vintage American family. As far as we are concerned, Mr. Lakin has permission to address this matter in any way he feels is appropriate in order to justify the risk to his very life and well-being which he has been ordered to undertake as a member of our military. His responsibility is to the Constitution, not any individual. His refusal to follow orders on these grounds is his prerogative.
As Mr. Lakin begins the legal fight of his life, we choose to see him as the soldier on the front line of a war against the current administration’s obvious and proven desire to undermine, dismiss and overrule the U.S. Constitution. If George Bush’s eligibility had been in question, we would have supported the same action against him.
Barack Obama has proven his contempt for the U.S. Constitution with his Healthcare law, financial bailouts, executive order 13489, regulatory overreach into private business and a general assault against the rights of a free press and our independent, capitalist society. Terry Lakin is a man who should be supported in every way possible. He is a credible figure with 18 years of highly qualified professional, decorated service to the United States, and moral justification.
In the future, we would simply ask that you either make a full effort, worthy of your profound success, to present all of the facts of this story in your usual proficient manner, or that you avoid it all together. Disseminating false, or loosely corroborated information compromises the integrity of public opinion about Mr. Lakin and, it makes you look less than knowledgeable about the subject. We don’t want either consequences.
Editorially, it begs the question: To what degree of deviation from authenticity must Obama further demonstrate his lack of aptitude in order for the primary media resources (you) to recognize that something is amiss with this man's qualities, legitimacy and, possibly, eligibility as a leader?
The dismissal of this vital matter without a thorough and pressed analysis is quite astonishing, and, I fear, it is allowing untold damage to the integrity of this nation...and our respective family's legacy of vintage inheritance.
We will continue to watch the Factor, as always. We wish you great success.