From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Friday, April 29, 2011

OUT OF ORDER: Obama’s Certificate Number Is Based On Geography, Not Chronological Birth Order!

REPORT REVEALS SHOCKING PROOF: Contrary to recent implications, new evidence supports that Barack Obama was not actually delivered in Kapi’olani hospital, as records suggest, but, rather, he was merely examined there by a private practitioner in the days following his birth, which triggered the validation of an administratively issued “Certificate of Live Birth” registration, not a hospital generated birth certificate representing an actual delivery which was later numbered due to an 'externally registered' birth.

By Pen Johannson and Dan Crosby
Of The Daily Pen


The one thing we've come to realize about Obama's covert identity is that if there suddenly appears information alleging to confirm it, it is highly probable that the information is unintentionally wrong or intentionally misleading. As Obama recently said, "We don't have time for this silliness."

The evidence herein is somewhat belaboring and intensive, but necessary to understand in order to place Obama’s recently revealed, highly questionable Health Department-issued “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration in its accurate context. Forget for a moment that the document is probably forged or that it confirms or denies anything. Just look at the data and measure it against the facts and what we know.

If you can ignore the fact that the name of the attesting local registrar who signed Obama's Certificate of Live Birth appears to be a possible forger's play on the word for a Hawaiian musical instrument, "UKULELE" (U. K. L. Lee), we will begin this report under the auspices that this alleged "Certificate of Live Birth" document image is an authentic record and that no conspiracy was required in order to create it, even though we know better.



Odd named local registrar signature on Obama's alleged certificate appears to be a forger's play on the Hawaiian word, "UKULELE" (U.K.L. Lee)
Remember the constroversy in August of 2009, when alleged, unnamed hackers affixed the name E.F. Lavender to a document purported to be an Obama Kenyan Birth Registration? It appears what's forged for the goose is also faked for the gander.


It makes one wonder when one of these brilliant document-smiths will create convincing documentation which finally reveals that Obama's father was actually a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama's birth. The only way to make Obama eligible is to convince the world his father was a U.S. citizen. What? No takers? We must come to accept that Obama's eligibility is that far from being valid.


However, regardless of its authenticity, we can also conclude it was not released by Kapi’olani hospital because it remains undocumented by that facility that Obama was actually born there. Rather, this document would have been released by the Hawaiian Department of Health based on that state's long-standing municipal vital records laws which mandate the creation of such an official birth record based, not only upon indigenous birth occurrences, but also residential circumstances of the parents preceding the birth.

TRICKY NUMBERS

Let's assume this "Certificate of Live Birth" document image is an authentic representation of an official record for a moment. It doesn't change the essential questions which remain about Obama's natural born identity. Was he born to parents who were U.S. citizens? Was he actually delivered in a U.S. Hospital at birth, not just examined there post-delivery by an attending physician? Did he lose his natural born status as an adopted resident of Indonesia?

Since the 2008 disclosure of Obama’s previously “only official” Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” just days before being ensconced to the Oval Office, many continue to wonder why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with at least two other registration numbers issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health in the days after Obama’s birth.

The answer to this question may have been answered in the 1961 Vital Statistics of United States Report in which it clarifies the manner in which birth records are assigned registration numbers. The guidelines in the report declare that registration numbers are assigned and stamped in the upper right margin of the certificates by the main office of each state's Health department office in geographic order of their reception in the main office from the multiple local offices around each state. The certificates are not assigned numbers according to chronological birth order or alphabetic order.

Why is this significant in relation to Obama's Certificate of Live Birth? Here's why.

This number ordering process was put in place by federal standards because the birth statistics from each state in 1961 were reported from each state to the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Office, based a 50-percent sampling method, FROM EVEN-NUMBERED RECORDS ONLY! (Section 5-8 Natality).

This means that, since the NVSD counted only those statistics from even-numbered certificates, in order to ensure a level of accuracy representing actual regional natality statistics for the whole geography of the United States, birth registration numbers had to be assigned geographically, not chronologically, because there was no way to ensure that all the EVEN-NUMBERED samples from births occurring in a given yearly time frame would not result from only densely populated regions, like large cities.


The listing of birth registrations below illustrates how regional ordering of registration numbers affects the chronological order. Notice that the first three birth registrations occuring in Regions 1,2 & 3 are assigned lower numbers than the first birth registration in Region 4 for a birth which occurred one day earlier. This is because the birth registration for Region 4 was the first one received by the main office which is 189 miles from the local registration office in Region 4. The main office of this State's Health Department is in Region 1. The registration numbers are assigned in their order of reception by the main office, not the chronological occurrence of the birth.

However, depending on the location of the newspaper in relationship to the local registration office in each region, the birth announcements might be printed in entire batches from just one region or a culmination of several small regions, which ever effectively filled the allocated space in the paper while announcing births as soon as possible without mixing the regions too much.

In Obama's case, his birth was registered in a regional office which was covered by the same newspapers as the main office of the Health Department. Therefore, his announcement would have been published as one of a batch of registrations from one or just a few regional registrations. The larger the batch, the more space required in the paper to cover an entire region. So, smaller batches and smaller regions were published first.

Therefore, because walk-in registrations and non-hospital births were more rare than the thousands of traditional hospital or facility births, they had to be isolated by regional offices in order make sure they were represented in the national vital statistics report. If birth registration numbers were assigned only based on chronological order, these rural births, walk-in registrations or non-hospital births might inadvertently all fall on odd-numbered records among the thousands of other births in the reporting year, state-wide. This would present inaccurate data about rural birth rates, birth health and rural demographics.

For example, let's say there were 10,000 births which were registered within the city of Honolulu in 1961 and there were another 1000 births which occurred in the sparsely populated rural areas outside of Honolulu during that same time for a total of 11,000 births in 1961.


If all 11,000 births were simply collected by the main office of the Health Department and assigned numbers based on their chronological occurence, the 1,000 rural birth might risk being registered with odd-numbers among the other 10,000 conventional hospital births. This would create inaccurate data about the non-hospital birth rate, which tends to be a measurement of births among lower income rural communities, remote indigenous populations, foreign immigrants and home deliveries, when it was reported to the U.S. Department of Health's National Vital Statistics Division for its annual report, which was based on a 50-percent reporting method of even-numbered certificates only. Obama's birth registration was allegedly assigned an odd-number among the other birth registrations for his regional office.


REGIONAL BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBERS VS. CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBERS...ILLUSTRATED


The tables below illustrate the difference in accuracy between reporting natal statistics based on a CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH NUMBERING ORDER and report natal statistics based on REGIONAL BIRTH NUMBERING ORDER.


In Table 1, we have listed the births which took place the same week as Obama's in chronological order and assigned them numbers based their order of occurrence. The birth registrations in grey occurred as a result of unattended, non-hospital or "walk-in" registration births which may not have occurred in Hawaii but which were registered as native births under Hawaiian laws or administrative procedures which do not align with the U.S. Constitution's "evidence for eligibility" mandate. These births were assigned numbers in chronological order along with all the other births occuring this week in hospitals around the state.

Given that the state of Hawaii was obligated to report only those natal statistics from even-numbered registrations, it would report only one (Obama's birth) of the six "walk-in" registrations, because only one had an even numbered registration. Therefore, only two of these unconventional births would be reported in the NVSD Report for Hawaii for this week, which is completely inaccurate for these rare birth rates.


However, Table 2 reflects the same births occurring the week of Obama's, only this time, the births are shown in their order of announcement in the newspapers based on REGIONAL ORDER and are assigned registration numbers base on their order of regional birth registration in local offices, not chronological order state-wide.
Notice that the same six "non-hospital" births are shown here, regionally, but are assigned different numbers than they would have been assigned if they were ordered chronologically. The same six "walk-in" registration births are now numbered based on their regional occurence and are now accounted for accurately even with the 50% - Even-Number reporting method used by the U.S. Department of Health in 1961, based on their regional order, not their chronological order. Although Obama's birth would not be reported based on his ODD-Numbered registration, the NVSD report would show a total of six "rural" or "non-hospital" total births for the state, which is an accurate accounting.


If the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based only on chronological order, the six rural births risk being underrepresented when the U.S. Department of Health requests Hawaii's EVEN-NUMBERED natal statistics for 1961 because those rural births might happen to occur in chronological order in which they are numbered with too many ODD NUMBERS and, therefore, be lost among the massive quantity of city births and, thus, the rural birth rate would be under-reported to the U.S. Department of Health.

Therefore, in order for the U.S. Department of Health to maximize accuracy and present the U.S. Natal Statistics report for as many geographic birth regions as possible, the numbers assigned by the main office in each state had to maximize sets of EVEN-NUMBERED certificates from as many geographic regions in the state as possible, regardless of the time of birth. Otherwise, if the numbers were only assigned based on chronological birth order, the records of births taking place in a large city might be represented by thousands of even numbers, whereas none or an "undercounted" number of rural births might be innaccurately represented if, by chance, they just happened fall on the remaining odd-numbered records.


The birth announcements shown here were those actually published with Barack Obama's announcement. They have been re-arranged from their original publishing order to demonstrate the results of chronological numbering over regional numbering. If the births in red happended to be walk-in registrations from a remote region of the state, those births would only have one birth assigned with an even-numbered registration qualified to be reported by the state to the U.S. Department of Health's NVSD. Therefore, since only one registration is even-numbered (out of six) the Natal Statistics Report would inaccurately reflect a birth rate 67% lower than it actually was for this region (2 births instead 6 births) based on counting only even-numbers. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Health enacted regional number sequences which would account for all six births in this situation.


Because rural births occur at a lower and slower rate than city births, rural births have a higher probability of being under-reported if they were only included in a chronological reporting order, rather than a geographic "regional batch" reporting order. What is the probability of one rural birth falling on a chronologically ordered ODD NUMBER among hundreds of traditional hospital births which would be more accurately represented by a 50-percent sampling of EVEN NUMBERS? Statistics for non-city or non-hospital births might not be reported at all if they were included in a chronological numbering order.

Therefore, the main offices of the state health departments were instructed to assign the numbering of certificates in the order of reception from each geographic registration location, not chronological sequence, in order to maximize report sampling and to ensure the best possible reporting accuracy from as many regions as possible, not just where populations were dense and where birth quantities were high.

This is a probable explanation for Obama's non-sequential birth registration number which is sequentially higher than registration numbers for births occurring after his. His number was assigned based on a registration which originated in a regional office or location not used to register births occurring at Kapi'olani. Obama's birth registration may have been a "walk-in" registration which relied upon a doctor's signature after examination of a newborn Obama, but not a birthing physician's signature present at the time of birth.


Since the birth announcements were published based on the order in which they were received from the main office of the health department, which assigned registration numbers based on the order they were received from regional local registration offices, it is reasonable to think that Obama's birth registration number was part of a smaller batch of registrations in that particular region. This is why the Nordyke twins birth were reported a week later. Their registration numbers, although lower in the sequence, came from largest region and the largest batch which required they be "carried over" into the following weeks column space in the paper.


THE REGIONAL BIRTH REGISTRATION PROCESS



Diagram showing "walk-in" and rural non-hospital birth registration process. The accuracy for reporting regional birth registrations is higher than reporting chronological order registrations because because births occurring in low population centers tend to be under-reported by the U.S. Department of Health's 50% method. These unconventional births had to be independently numbered by their reception based on regional or local office origins of the state's Health Department because chronological birth registrations did not accurately account for small numbers of these registrations which might fall on ODD-Numbered registrations. Natal statistics reveal that more 17,000 births occured in Hawaii in 1961. That is an average of 330 births per week from various islands and regions which had to be accounted for and reported to the NVSD. Of these births, nearly 17% were non-hospital births among citizen population and around 40% for non-residential, rural, non-citizen and remote indigenous population. However, Hawaii was unique because of its remote location, indigenous culture and permeable migration. Many births occurred in Hawaii which were never recorded in the NVSD report due to under-registration. Non-conventional birth registrations and walk-in registrations occurred at a much lower rate in other states which increased the need for isolating walk-in registrations and non-hospital registrations.



This evidence reveals that Obama’s non-sequential birth registration number is the result of his registration being isolated because it was not a traditional hospital birth. His number was assigned based on the birth being registered in a regional office not used by the hospital which Obama claims to have been born in, rendering the possibility that his “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration issued by the Hawaiian Vital Records office is merely a record of birth registration legally created by the Health Department under HRS 338-17.8, after baby Obama was examined by a doctor, at Kapi’olani hospital, who could attest to his live birth, post-delivery.
These recently discovered sources show that Obama’s birth registration number was assigned by the state’s main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health after his birth registration originated in a regional office not used by the hospital to register births actually occurring within its facility.

Documentation provided by Volume 1 of the “1961 Vital Statistics Report of the United States” further supports the factual plausibility that Obama’s birth occurred in a geographic location other than Hawaii and was not registered in the traditional manner as other children born in the hospital, locally. This evidence supports the claim that his non-sequential birth registration number is indeed the result of his birth being registered in an alternative local office, not the typical office used by the hospital.

OBAMA'S KAPI'OLANI BIRTHMATES?

Recall, according to copies of birth records released by the hospital, the Nordyke’s twin girls were delivered just 19 hours after Obama was born, supposedly just down the hall from where Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham was allegedly staying in Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital on Saturday afternoon of August 5th, 1961. The Nordyke twins, Susan and Gretchen, were issued sequential birth registration numbers, 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638, respectively.

The Nordyke's released two photostatic copies of their hospital generated "Certificates of Live Birth" in 2009. Contrarily, Obama released a Health Department generated version of a same titled document last week. The differences are significant and in need of investigation because the Nordyke's document an actual delivery within the hospital while Obama's documents only a birth registration by the HDOH after he was examined by a doctor from the named hospital.


With the revelation of a belated image of an alleged, original 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” registration record, released by the Hawaiian Department of Health, not the hospital, it is now unanimously accepted that Obama’s birth registration number is 151-61-10641, which is also confirmed by its updated version of 151-1961-10641 on the previously exalted “Certification of Live Birth” and, most importantly, which is a number larger than both the twins even though he was born chronologically before them.

Even number assigned for Gretchen Nordyke which would have been reported to the U.S. NVSD Natal Statistics office.

Obama's alleged original 1961 Department of Health issued Certificate of Live Birth shown here to omit the critical "amendment section" containing entry spaces for medical information, change of parentage by adoption, signatures of the Health director and Deputy Registrar, and birth weight and height.

Before we buy in to the strange document signed by Registrar Ukulele, we need to recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 states the following:

(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the Director of Health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
As we all have become familiar, the statute explicitly states that the Director of Health in 1961 was obligated to issue a birth certificate “provided that proof had been submitted to the Director of Health that the parents had declared Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth…or adoption of such child”, regardless of the location of that birth.

We know Obama’s parents lived in Hawaii for at least one year preceding his birth or adoption. Therefore, this law would have applied if he were born elsewhere or adopted and was taken to Hawaii where the birth was registered.

Notice the dates of the signatures on the newly released Certificate of Live Birth registration issued by the Health Department. The alleged signature of Obama’s mother was documented on Monday, August 7, 1961, the earliest day available to sign the registration. Obama was born the evening of Friday, August 4th, which means government offices were closed on Saturday the 5th, and Sunday the 6th, but the hospital was not.

The documents also reveal that they were signed by an attending physician and received by a local registrar, in different offices, three days apart, despite being signed on the same day by the parent.


Therefore, the Nordyke's Kapi'olani generated birth certificates were signed on August 11th by the registrar, three days later than Obama's registration, because the Nordyke's certificates were two of more than 100 which occurred in that registration office during that week. Obama's was signed on August 8th and recorded three days earlier because his Certificate was merely one of four registration records occurring in that local office. The process moved faster for Obama's registration because there were fewer certificates for that local registrar to process than the quantity of registrations processed in the office used by the city's main hospital where the Nordyke's registered. This occurred because of the 50-percent sampling and geographic number order process required by the U.S. Department and its effect on Obama's "externally" registered birth in another registration office not used by the hospital.



This evidence suggests the possibility that baby Obama was examined at Kapi’olani within days after his birth by a physician able to legally attest an original birth record issued, not by the hospital, but by the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH).Kapi’olani hospital has never issued or confirmed an original record for the birth of Barack Obama within its facility to date. However, the HDOH is able to legally name the hospital in its original "Certificate of Live Birth" Regisration based on the legal fact that, if it is the location of the first examination of a newborn child by a physician there, the signature of the doctor triggers the birth location in absence of any other birth location information.

Simply put, the evidence suggests that Obama was not born in Kapi'olani, but he may have been examined for the first time there.

REVELATIONS

This week, as Obama released a long-form version of a Health Department issued “Certificate of Live Birth” document we find it adds merely three more pieces of information about his natal biography than we previously knew before from the fallow “Certification of Live Birth” heavily lauded by his defenders as the 'holy grail' of his eligibility.

Now, with this new and improved ‘Holier Grail”, historical information from the U.S. Department of Health shows that this document only detracts from Obama’s effort to confirm his eligibility and that it would best be described as a state-issued, non-standard ‘Long-form Certificate of Live Birth Registration’ created by administrative procedure as a result of legal confirmation, not a hospital as a result of an actual delivery. We are already accustomed to the fact that the Hawaiian Department of Health revises in document header titles willy-nilly, whenever it seems convenient to Obama.

The information provided in Obama's recently revealed HDOH "Certificate of Live Birth" Registration document, when combined with an understanding of Hawaiian vital statistics records laws, municipal reporting procedures, and federal Natality reporting guidelines, shows that this “Certificate of Live Birth” registration could have been legally produced by the HDOH without Obama necessarily actually being delivered in the hospital named within it, and that the doctor, by affixing his signature, was only required to attest an original record based on his examination of the newborn Obama Jr., not necessarily as an attending (birthing) physician present during the actual delivery, but rather as the first physician to actually examine the child alive and in good health.

This evidence supports the fact that the on-going, original questions of Obama's actual birth location remain decisively unanswered and that this document could actually be an elaborate hoax by brazened forgers.The Nordyke twins were born on Saturday, August 5th, but their “Certificates of Live Birth” were not attested by the attending physician of record, assigned numbers and registered by the Department of Health until Thursday, August 11th. Obama’s birth was registered on Tuesday, August 8th even though it occurred just hours before the Nordyke’s. However, both documents for all three births were signed by the parents on the same day, Monday, August 7th.

Keep in mind, Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” was released by the Department of Health, not the alleged hospital of record. Although the Health Department was obligated to provide him with a “Certificate of Live Birth” in 1961, via the administrative process mandated by HRS 338-17.8, his birth would not actually have to occur in the Hospital stated on the record in order for this record to be created. However, as provided by HRS 338-5, after baby Obama had been examined by an “attending” physician sometime between August 5th and August 8th at the hospital, the Department of Health was able to create the official record of birth after the doctor’s signed approval, containing the name of the hospital where the examination took place.

Essentially, the Hawaiian Department of Health does not issue an official birth certificate under the provision of HRS 338-17.8 until a board certified physician has examined the child in an official medical facility of record.

So, how was Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” assigned a larger number than his birth-mates?

As mentioned, Section 5-8 of the ‘Vital Statistics of the United States: Volume 1 – Natality” report states:

Sampling of Birth Records

The manner in which records are numbered greatly reduces the sampling variability of totals for geographic areas. Records are numbered in the primary state offices of vital statistics as they are received from the local offices. The assignment of the last digit in the number is not selective and systematic sampling of even-numbered records may be assumed to be unbiased. Furthermore, because the records are always in geographic order BEFORE numbering, twice the same count of births occurring in the great majority of counties is the same as the corresponding figure based on all records.


The key words are, "records are numbered in the primary state offices as they are received and are always in geographic order before numbering." Essentially, this means that Obama's birth registration, which was received by the main office before the Nordyke twins', was assigned a higher number because it was received by the main office in geographic order, not chronological order. Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins' birth.

This confirms that, in 1961, the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based on the order of reception of birth registrations from various local registration offices, not from the hospitals of the births. Therefore, if Obama’s birth registration was included with the Nordyke twins and other births occurring at Kapiolani in same HDOH birth registration office, we should expect the Nordyke's numbers to be assigned in order of reception at the same time as Obama's!!

However, since it is likely that Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins, who were actually born in Kapi’olani hospital, Obama’s birth registration was assigned a number based on its "geographic order", not its chronological order, of registration.

If Obama was actually born in Kapi’olani hospital on August 4th, 1961, why was his birth registered in a different geographic location as indicated by the non-sequential number, on August 8th, which would therefore trigger a registration number out of order with the Nordyke twins' birth of August 5th who were registered with all the other births in Kapi’olani?

DIFFERENT LOCAL REGISTRARS

Aside from the fact that Obama’s 'Certificate of Live Birth' Registration released by the Hawaiian Department of Health appears to be affixed with a signature which appears to play on the Hawaiian word, "UKULELE" (U.K.L. Lee), it is also represented by different local registrar than is shown on the Nordyke’s Hospital version of the Certificate of Live Birth. A different local registrar worked in each of the four branch offices in which births were registered in Hawaii. Obama's birth was registered in an office which is not the office use by Kapi’olani to register births occurring in its facility.

The name of a local registrar is not associated with other birth certificates for births which actually occurred at Kapi’olani and which were attested by physicians who actually delivered those births. This registrar worked in a branch office not used by Kapi’olani to register births. This is why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with other births at the same time as his.

OUT OF ORDER TOO: THE NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Last month, The Daily Pen’s Dan Crosby, published the results of his investigation of the procedures used to publish birth announcements in Hawaii. He found historical evidence which supports that fact that Obama’s birth did not occur in Kapi’olani, but which was registered in a different local office after he was examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani on August 7th, 1961.

Crosby went to Hawaii to research and investigate the cavalcade of ambiguous information related to Obama’s covert natal history including the origins and protocols used to publish the birth announcements in 1961. He focused on the manner in which the Hawaiian Department of Health and local hospitals coordinated vital statistics information and how the chain of information from the Hospital to the Hawaiian Department of Health resulted in “Weekly Health Bureau Statistics” announcements published in the local papers.

Crosby found evidence that the order in which the announcements were published was not random or chronological. In fact, he discovered they were published by the order of birth registration numbers assigned by the main Office of Vital Records which, in turn, were based on reception from various local registration branches. He discovered that, regardless of when the birth may have occurred, the registration number, assigned by the geographic order of the registration offices, determined the order of the announcements.

This is why Obama’s birth announcements occur near the bottom of each column in each newspaper even though there are births which occurred before and after his but which are published above his in the papers. This is because the births published above his all occurred in the same place and were registered in the same office and then passed to the central main office. The numbers were, therefore, ordered by the main office of the Health department in reference to their geographic registration order, not their chronological occurrence.

An investigation of the addresses of the birth registrations reveals that they migrate proximally to either a medical facility or to a local registration office. This is logical because most pregnant women would desire a hospital in close proximity once contractions began.

The birth announcements and ordering based on geographic registration location are shown below as they appear in the two versions of the newspapers.

Mr. and Mrs. Samuel K. Haas Sr. 849-A 11th Ave. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Charles J. Staley 1319 Anapa St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard R. Kitson Apt. 11, 1635 Clark St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. George P. Ayau Sr. 87-143 Lillana St., Malll 7/31/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Thaddeus J. Raymond 1371 Haloa Drive 7/30/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Robert I. Arakawa 935-B Hausten St., 8/1/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Y. Takahashi 56 Nanea Ave, Wahiawa 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Allington K. Brown Maunawill Road, Kallua 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Cirillo V. Caperto 918 Puuhale Road 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel L. M. Mokuahi Sr 732 Laukea St. 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Peter C. Kamealoha Jr. 441 McNeill St. 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Clifford Sr. 2624 Maunawai Place 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward W. Walker 1660 S. King St., 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Wallace M. Durkin 3813 Radford Drive 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Mike M. Nagaishi 2687 Gardenia 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Glenn E. Earnest 1258 Wilhelmina Rise 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. H. Chun 45-440 Akimala St., Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Waidelich 937 18th Ave. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Emmett P. Simpson 2752 Kahiti St. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Melvin K. F. Liu 45-548 Keaahala Road, Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Wright 91-939 Kalapu St., Ewa Beach, Ewa 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Andrew A. M. Hatchle 2420 Kaululaau St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs Harry Y.W. Wong 463 Lawelwe St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Ernesto Kim

Note that the announcements are in the exact same order in both papers. Also, notice Obama’s birth registration announcement nearer the bottom of the order in the last group while the birth dates appear to be grouped rather than ordered from the top of the column to the bottom. This indicates they are indeed grouped by geographic registration occurrence as they are received in batches from each branch location by the main Health Department office, as prescribed by the guidelines described in the NVSD report. Otherwise, the birth order would be published based on either alphabetical or chronological order, which they are not, as obviously shown here. This is an indication that Obama’s birth registration was received by the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health from a location other than the office used to register births occurring in Kapi’olani.

Obama's announcement was published on August 12th and 13th of the editions of the Star and Sunday Advertiser in 1961. The Nordyke's announcement was publish the following week. Obama's announcement was published earlier than his alleged "birthmates" because his registration was among fewer which were processed as part of a batch of "walk-in" registrations from another local office. His record was processed faster and earlier and was able to be fit within the space provided by the newspaper for that batch of registration records that week. The larger overall quantity of registrations containing the Nordyke's records had to be carried over to the following week because their large batch required three more days to process and be allocated space in the papers.


Obama’s DOH “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration omits the “Amendment section” from its lower margin which is present on the hospital generated version and contains space available for amendments, dates of examinations and medical information. It is also used to show the signatures of the Director of Health and the Deputy Registrar. This is absent from Obama’s HDOH document because it was not generated by the hospital and this doctor was not present at his birth and did not preside over later amendments, such as Obama’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro.

CONCLUSIONS

Obama’s birth was not registered in the same Health Department office as the Nordyke twins and hundreds of other births occurring the week of July 30 – August 5th at Kapi’olani hospital. Birth numbering order was established by federal standards according to geography not chronological order of births, in order to maximize accuracy of natal statistics reporting over as wide as possible a registration area throughout the entire U.S. Chronological ordering alone presented a highly disproportionate risk of under-reported rural, non-hospital and non-resident births due to the U.S. Department of Health's 50%-reporting method based only on even-numbered certificates.


If state's reported only even-numbered births from all births in chronological order, and the walk-in registrations from a particular region all happened to fall on "odd-numbered" birth schedules, they would not be reported accurately for that region. This is why regional reporting was enacted over chronological reporting. However, regional reporting also created non-sequential numbering with respect to birth date and time.

The publication of Obama’s birth announcement near the bottom of the columns of the two newspapers, printed lower than announcements for births which occurred after his, indicates that his birth registration document was received and ordered in accordance with geographic location, not chronological order or alphabetic order. This, therefore, indicates that Obama's birth actually occurred in a location other than Kapi'olani hospital.

Dr. David Sinclair was not present during the delivery of Barack Obama. However, since he was the first physician to examine baby Obama and his mother at Kapi’olani on August 7th or 8th, he is legally bound to record his signature as the attending physician of record at that time. Per HRS 338, the naming of the hospital is subsequent to the naming of the doctor where the examination, not the birth, took place.

Since Dr. Sinclair was not the birthing physician, he could not officially attest to Obama’s birth weight, which is absent from the HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration.

The name of local registrar is different on Obama’s HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration because Obama’s birth was not registered in the same branch office of the Vital Statistics office as births occurring at Kapi’olani.

As testified by the 1961 Vital Statistics of the United States Report, Obama’s birth registration number is non-sequential with other births at the same time because it was assigned by the main office of the HDOH after it was received from one of multiple registration offices in Hawaii. The HDOH assigned Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth a registration number based on its geographic registration location, not chronological occurrence in a hospital.

Obama’s recently revealed Certificate of Live Birth was created and issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health through administrative procedures based on HRS 338 and Administrative Rules. It was not generated by any hospital and was only attested by an attending physician after an examination of the newborn Obama qualified the HDOH to issue an original birth certificate provided by HRS 338-17.8.

Therefore, the geographic location of Obama’s actual emergence from his mother’s womb remains a mystery.

Regardless, the identity of Obama’s foreign father is confirmed in this suspicious but newly released Certificate of Live Birth Registration, which disqualifies Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency even if he was shown by a hospital generated birth certificate to have been born in Hawaii.


Apparently, even a document forger can agree on that.

253 comments:

  1. So proof positive that Obama was born in Hawaii at the time and place he says he was, has not been made. In order to do that, we need to know Obama's weight at the time Dr. Sinclare examined him.

    Is it true that Dr. Sinclare would have also been legally bound to sign Obama's birth certificate if Obama's weight had been within a year of an infant's growth standard?

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    ReplyDelete
  2. Given that he was born on the evening of Friday August 4, and the document was signed by the mother on August 7, and the doctor on August 8, it would seem that he indeed was probably born in Hawaii. I do not think that a newborn would be taken by airplane to Hawaii before any registration of birth had occurred. It does seem that the mother could have insisted on using a midwife instead of going to the hospital or insisted on going home as soon as possible. Given that this would be just "the way things are" he may not even have been told the story.

    For example, someone may not be told the story of how his mother got to the hospital unless it was a "family history" or an unusual event. In that case, the only way he might know where he was "born" would be from the birth certificate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?q=1&;page=1551

    Look at thread 1565 and keep going. It references a baby born Aug 4, 1961 which dies the next day on Aug 5th. What's that child's certificate number?? Could it be possible that that number is the certificate number Obama is actually using and that is why the sequence is out of order? Is it possible to track down the living relatives of this deceased child to obtain a BC?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sabba,

    Thanks for the comment. The point of the report is to show that there remains a void of documentation from the very source of Obama's actual birth location. The "Certificate of Live Birth" released this week was issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health and we can conclude with a high level of certaintly that he was not born in the offices of the Department of Health.

    The fact that the Amendment section of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth" is omitted along with his birth weight, and the fact that the local registrar is different than the one who signed other birth certificates of other births at the same time, combined with the provisions of Hawaiian vital records laws, leaves WIDE OPEN the possibility that Obama was not actually delivered in Kapi'olani.

    I will not go as far to say that he was not born in Hawaii, but this evidence reveals that he may not have actually been delivered in the hospital. He could have very well be born in Hawaii, but if he was, why does Kapi'olani not just go ahead and release their copy. Right? It should be the same so no information to be threatened by. Right?

    Dan Crosby

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello, I was reading this facinating article and went to look at one of the Nordyke twins certificate of live birth. I noticed that their certificate also lacks a place for birth weight.

    Please have a look:
    http://i856.photobucket.com/albums/ab128/diamonds3700/BC/0a0b9a60.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  6. Retired,

    Our intention is to directly compare the Obama HDOH document with the official 1961 template version of the NVSD Certificate of Live Birth blank which is stated in the report as the "Standard Certificate". This standard form of the document contains an entry space (box) for the birth weight which is not present on Obama's or the Nordyke's document. We did not clarify the metrics of our comparison well and will do so. Thank you for noticing.

    However, the essential question being, why did Obama's doctor (and the Nordyke's if you will) not attest to the weight of the children in the copies presented?

    If you take a closer look at the Nordyke's certificates, the lower margin of the copies are either covered by, or include a region signed by two officials, where Obama's document does not have this region. A review of the standard template shows that this is the region where the birth weight would be included.

    Thanks Again.

    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  7. Since the actual date of birth is not certified...which is the fact Obama has been trying to hide for the past two years...Obama could have been born anywhere when he showed up in front of Dr. Sinclare.

    Given such circumstance, would it have been medically discernable by the doctor to recognize a forgery in the given date of birth of a month or two?

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    ReplyDelete
  8. Will someone please go to Coast Hospital in Mombasa Kenya and get a BC of Barack Obama. It is not impossible. Lucas Smith did it. There must be one other person who can do it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One thing about Lucas Smith. Attorney Mario Apuzzo has asked for clarification that he went to Kenya. His client, Cmdr Charles Kerchner, asked Mr. Smith to provide proof he went to Kenya such as a plane ticket receipt or Hotel receipt and to have the Kenyan birth certificate authenticated at their expense. This has been asked of Smith several times on talk shows and tben he dissappears. He absolutely will not submit it for a 'attestation'. That sends up red flags. He should let the document be looked over.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Big question! How to bring these facts to the American people. Donald Trump seems to be the only one capable of "pulling it off". Will he take this information and run with it? The id's of the local registers of Hawaii on 8/8/61 are recorded some where aren't they? Is U.K.L. Lee one of them?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Although it seems fishy, the "U K L Lee" signature is most likely not made up. In a recent FreeRepublic thread, someone born in Hawaii in the '60s mentioned that their birth certificate had the same signature. (Sorry, I don't have a link right now.)

    ReplyDelete
  12. My take on the BC issue: http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/my-take-on-obamas-bc-release?xg_source=activity

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank you to everyone for the comments. We continue to "bird-dog" this information as it evolves.

    However, as we have always maintained, without tolerance or weakness, it is our position that Obama is not eligible because of his foreign parentage and the fact that his citizenship status has never be clarified after his relocation to Indonesia.

    Any argument about Obama's undocumented birth place is worthy, but, in itself, a resolution to this single dimension of the unarguable historical definition of Natural Born citizenship only solves part of Obama's eligibility doubts.

    Therefore, this document is moot, regardless of its authenticity. His father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth. No forger will ever change this. Ever.

    Thanks again,

    D-Croz

    ReplyDelete
  14. In terms of an Art. II, natural born citizen, clearly, Barack Obama Jr. is not. By law, he is a 14th Amendment citizen. Without such a law, he would have taken on the citizen of his father -- is my present understanding.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    ReplyDelete
  15. Why do we have to assume the birth date to be set in stone. He was born at some time before the actual date, maybe weeks.This could give time for Ann to rest up before she went to school in the States. Or time to return from Kenya. All the other time lines are false why accept his Birthday??

    ReplyDelete
  16. §338-6 Local agent to prepare birth certificate. (a) If neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as provided in section 338-5 is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local agent of the department of health shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.

    (b) The department shall prescribe the time within which a supplementary report furnishing information omitted on the original certificate may be returned for the purpose of completing the certificate. Certificates of birth completed by a supplementary report shall not be considered as "delayed" or "altered". [L 1949, c 327, §10; RL 1955, §57-9; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-6]

    ReplyDelete
  17. I read a couple of years ago that Stanley Ann was in Kenya quite pregnate and when she went to get on a plane to go back to Hawaii they wouldn't let her on the plane because she was too far along. Because of this she was forced to have the baby in Kenya and flew back to Hawaii just as soon as she could. So the question is how soon after delivery could she fly back to Hawaii and register the baby back then. Also how old would a baby have to be before the doctor could tell that it was not a real newly born infant. Perhaps a better way of asking this question would be if a baby was born on July fifth somewhere other than Hawaii and a month or so later was flown to Hawaii with it's mother could it have been registered there and the doctor told it was younger then it really was? I don't know if this could happen or not but if it had it would explain how people in Kenya believe he was born. Wouldn't it be interesting to get prints of the bottom of Obama's feet and compare them to those on the Lucas Smith BC. Another thing that occured to me is that it would be interesting if it were possible to trace Obama's history through DNA. YOU ARE THE FATHER!!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. It appears Dr. Sinclair had ties to Obama through their mutual Communist involvement. If this is the case then it makes the assumption that the baby was taken to the hospital for examination when the form could have been filled in without the doctor ever seeing Baby Oshit.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. batazoid said...
    Allow me to amend my previous statement: Barack Obama Jr. is either a 14th Amendment native born U.S. Citizen or a natural born U.S. citizen bastard, as his wife has suggested.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    ReplyDelete
  21. A Mystery?
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
    http://www.tmz.com/2011/04/27/white-house-barack-obama-birth-certificate-hawaii

    See
    HRS 338-5 Compulsory registration of births.
    HRS 338-15 Late or altered certificates.
    HRS 338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates
    HRS 338-17 Late or altered certificate as evidence.

    August 5, 1961
    http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/editing/
    http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/NordykeTwinsBirthcertificate.jpg
    http://constitutionallyspeaking.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/m1139416728.gif
    http://www.wnd.com/images/090728nordyke.jpg
    http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/dailypix/2008/Dec/22/hawaii812220320V2_b.jpg
    http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2008/Dec/22/ln/hawaii812220320.html
    (Nothing matches Obama. Different Registrar on Birth Cert, )

    June 15, 1962
    http://passportsusa.com/wp-content/gallery/passportusa/edith_front.jpg
    http://passportsusa.com/wp-content/gallery/passportusa/edith_rear.jpg
    (Attending Richard Y Noda, Same 'ukeleli Registrar as Obama, raised seal)

    ReplyDelete
  22. batazoisd et al:

    There are other possibilities also. With the Nordyke/Obama certificate number anomaly clarified, the WHBC of Apr. 27 only shows that Barky was seen by the Dr. presumably (but not iron-clad) at Kapiolani and examined as an already born elsewhere baby. He could have been a good bit more than newly-born.

    We still know nothing about the guy let alone the fact that he is an American citizen. He could equally well be Indonesian or even an illegal alien.

    "El Presidente Wetback" has a nice ring to it, I think. Until we find out more concretely, that's my bet.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Jayay,

    Interesting...how, given the dates, assuming the WHBC is authentic?

    ex animo
    batazoid

    ReplyDelete
  24. I've done a paper on that sssumption though I believe it matters not since he'd told everyone well before the elections that daddy was an alien, making him ineligible.

    I merely wanted to see what the situation would be IF (VERY Big IF)the WHBC were authentic so that the Flying Monkeys could have their wings clipped. As it turns out, such a study shows that the guy not only was not born at Kapiolani or any other hospital in HI but was born outside the US ... and this is his fradulent BC showing this when assumed "real".

    Almost everyone has missed the significance of the certificate registration numbers and what the really mean. Dan and Pen have done some great work there ...

    ReplyDelete
  25. batazoid et al:

    It's really pretty clear that the WHBC is merely another forgery attempting to back up the Certifications of Live Birth falsely generated a couple of years ago. Absolutely cut from the same cloth but with a duller pair of scissors if you will due to its even more egregious flaws.

    That said, lets PRETEND that the WHBC is the "real thing" since Barkly has now signed on to the fraud also and for real. Here's an article that spells out why the WHBC, then, says that not only was he NOT born in Kapiolani, but not even in any other HI hospital meaning that he HAD to have been born either on top of the DOH regional office filing cabinets OR in some other country:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/new-analysis-on-obamas-birth.html

    In addition to the reasoning in that article, if one checks the location of the families in the actual newspaper birth announcement "ads" starting with Barky's you see that they DO appear to be relatively remote from Kapiolani. I think "The Little Man Who Wasn't There!!" is a very likely description of what went down in Paradise in '61. Also the "using the expired child's registration number" doesn't check out with dates/times not only of the registrations but of the newspaper ads either and would have to have meant that even in '61 people were into "frauding up" Barkys vitals so he could be Pres ... which is exactly what the MSM has ginned up as a red herring to attack "birthers" with.

    I never knew that supporting the Constitution was a "conspiracy theory".

    Pen & Dan - please email me at jsheldon@socal.rr.com

    ReplyDelete
  26. Though it may have been addressed.... in looking closely at the actual long form PDF, why did someone obviously add a digital "1" to the registration number? And why on earth didn't they send a whole completely new digital copy that would have been filed. When I asked for a copy of mine a few years ago, I got a completely new laser printed copy with state seal and all, not some bad scan of something "typed out" and left in a file cabinet all this time. That to me is the most stupid thing about this fake thing they presented. Is Hawaii still in the middle ages?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hello,
    When I design custom invitations, I offer to design custom postage for my clients to complete the look of their invitation package. The party starts when the guests open their invitations, so setting the tone of the party with the invitation is important. But even before the envelope is opened, the first impression the guest has of the invitation is what’s on the outside.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The people not reading your blogs are missing out a lot of quality contents.
    auto imports

    ReplyDelete
  29. I would be pleased if all WebPages provided such articles.
    get a job abroad

    ReplyDelete
  30. I'd like to take the power of thanking you for that specialized guidance I've constantly enjoyed viewing your blog.
    More about My X Tea

    ReplyDelete
  31. I’m soooo happy through your blog posts, and waiting for the upcoming posts. Relationship Advice by Ai Worlds

    ReplyDelete
  32. Ahaa, it’s nice conversation on the subject of this post at this place, I actually have read all that, therefore at this time me additionally commenting at this place.
    online payday loans direct lenders

    ReplyDelete
  33. Unexpected work you people do with this webpage.
    online payday loan

    ReplyDelete
  34. Your blogs are truly awesome I have no words to praise for your blogs. Read More about Leonardo Spencer

    ReplyDelete
  35. I admired your helpful words. Top class contribution. I really hope you’ll write more. I'll continue looking for.
    Full Camome Article

    ReplyDelete
  36. The writer understand better the mind of people what they want to learn through their writing therefore this article is outstanding. Thanks!!!Dj Nahxa Tips

    ReplyDelete
  37. I’m trampled by your contents carry on the wonderful work.
    Push Button to File Bankruptcy

    ReplyDelete
  38. It’s never too late to improve your information and your contents inspire me.
    extract iPhone backup
    iPhone data recovery

    ReplyDelete
  39. I have visited lots of the blogs but this blog is truthfully wonderful.
    car accident claim

    ReplyDelete
  40. This is really quite informative blog such qualitative info I have never seen anywhere. ppi reclaim

    ReplyDelete
  41. Your blog is such like that I have run out of words!!! Really superb bad credit payday loan

    ReplyDelete
  42. The info you provided in the blog that was really unique I love it!!! payday loan lenders

    ReplyDelete
  43. I have been intelligent for hours and I haven't gone through such awesome stuff.
    Click for Better Gas Mileage

    ReplyDelete
  44. Great blog post! I don’t understand how long it will require me to obtain through all of them! Full Irani24 Article

    ReplyDelete
  45. The abysmal you dig into the content and communicate us the precise aggregation is appreciable. More about Luke Q. Stafford

    ReplyDelete
  46. The material and aggregation is excellent and telltale as comfortably.

    Post Wand Light Relationships

    ReplyDelete
  47. Great webpage brother I am gona inform this to all my friends and contacts. Advice by We Are Post Plus

    ReplyDelete
  48. That's a great position you folks have been carrying out there.
    Click Live Play Alagarto Link

    ReplyDelete
  49. Your articles don't displace around the bushes correct t to the part.
    Good Relationship With Tico Art

    ReplyDelete
  50. You guys eliminate it real unproblematic for all the folks out there.
    ppi reclaim

    ReplyDelete
  51. I sent your articles links to all my contacts and they all love it including me.
    Bike Curious Articles

    ReplyDelete
  52. I believe this is actually the most useful blog I've been through this entire day.
    Chi Tech Academy Tips And Tricks

    ReplyDelete
  53. I shared this on Facebook! My buddies will definitely want it!
    Responsive Web Design companies in india

    ReplyDelete
  54. The blog has offered the great knowledge I really enjoyed a lot by reading this.
    cheap life insurance quote

    ReplyDelete
  55. Amazing work pals, I really enjoy reading your interesting blogs.infographic

    ReplyDelete
  56. Your blogs are fantastic, useful and your articles are wonderful.
    infographics design

    ReplyDelete
  57. I sent your articles links to all my contacts and they all adore it including me.
    social media infographics

    ReplyDelete
  58. Wasp dudes! Amazing stuff continues the good work. infographic

    ReplyDelete
  59. This is actually a fantastic blogs! More of these details are superb -it is nice to see one that current.
    payday loans oregon

    ReplyDelete
  60. The info you provided in the blog that was really unique I love it!!!infographic design

    ReplyDelete
  61. Well, it’s a nice one, I have been looking for. Thanks for sharing such informative stuff. infographics design

    ReplyDelete
  62. The stuff in this blog is in not only incredible but also providing the great knowledge to the people.a1c chart

    ReplyDelete
  63. I would never crave to lose out any chance to look throughout your contents.
    best whole life insurance

    ReplyDelete
  64. The blog is good enough I again n again read this. car insurance

    ReplyDelete
  65. I even have been getting a lot of helpful and informative material in your web site.
    auto insurance quotes

    ReplyDelete
  66. Totally unique stuff is here really amazing!!!
    read more

    ReplyDelete
  67. Superb posts with lots of information!!! This is really the most miraculous blog site dude….
    www.grafical.dk/kopipapir

    ReplyDelete
  68. This blog post is really great; the standard stuff of the post is genuinely amazing.edmonton seo

    ReplyDelete
  69. How fine of you!!!! Really awesome efforts you have shown.
    zip password recovery

    ReplyDelete
  70. This is my very first time that I am visiting here and I’m truly pleasurable to see everything at one place.vehicle insurance rates

    ReplyDelete
  71. An enormous round of applause, continue the great work.income support number

    ReplyDelete
  72. Outstanding blog, in my opinion site owners should acquire a great deal out of this blog its very user welcoming. compare car insurance quotes

    ReplyDelete
  73. The blog and data in this, is very good and informative also.
    best weight loss foods

    ReplyDelete
  74. I am really appreciating very much by seeing your interesting posts.http://bonville.org/

    ReplyDelete
  75. An enormous round of applause, continue the great work.
    Detox Drinks

    ReplyDelete
  76. I'm certainly very happy to read this blog site posts which carries plenty of helpful data, thanks for providing such information. pirater un compte facebook

    ReplyDelete
  77. Fine method of telling, and enjoyable article to acquire factual statements. hacker un compte facebook

    ReplyDelete
  78. I love all details that you give in your articles. hacker un compte facebook

    ReplyDelete
  79. I’m definitely coming again to see these articles and blogs.
    car insurance quote

    ReplyDelete
  80. These are the great blogs; I assure you that I really enjoyed a lot in reading.
    auto insurance cost

    ReplyDelete
  81. You people have actually provided the best blogs that are easy to understand for the folks. life insurance rates

    ReplyDelete
  82. congratulations guys, quality information you have given!!! compare car insurance rates

    ReplyDelete
  83. The individuals not reading your blogs stuff are missing out much qualitative contents. online payday loans in alabama

    ReplyDelete
  84. Regarding all aspects the blog was perfectly nice. Orthotic Shoes

    ReplyDelete
  85. Every day I visit a number of blog sites to see content, however this offers quality based content.
    vietnam visa

    ReplyDelete
  86. You fully match our expectation and the selection of our data.best universal life insurance policies

    ReplyDelete
  87. It’s an outstanding article in favor of all the web guests; they will get benefit from it I am confident.
    Buy Follistatin

    ReplyDelete
  88. Really amazing blog, I’d love to discover some extra information.
    life insurance

    ReplyDelete
  89. The stuff written in the blogs have allured me!!! helen heart shoes

    ReplyDelete
  90. I'd purely tell you all “awesome information”

    vietnam travel

    ReplyDelete
  91. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Really amazing blog, I’d love to discover some extra information.
    Buy Follistatin

    ReplyDelete
  93. Your blogs are truly awesome I have no words to praise for your blogs.
    excess baggage shipping

    ReplyDelete
  94. This is my very first time that I am visiting here and I’m truly pleasurable to see everything at one place.is bubblegum casting legitimate

    ReplyDelete
  95. Whether somebody pursuit of his vital thing, hence he or she desires to be accessible that at length, hence that thing is maintained over here.
    buy twitter followers UK

    ReplyDelete
  96. Fascinating information I haven’t been experienced such information in quite a long time.buy twitter followers UK

    ReplyDelete
  97. I’m trampled for the blogs writings and also blogs.
    domain name

    ReplyDelete
  98. Fascinating information I haven’t been experienced such information in quite a long time.

    central booking new york

    ReplyDelete
  99. This blog is truly extraordinary in all aspects.
    vietnam visa on arrival

    ReplyDelete
  100. This is very essential blog; it helped me a lot whatever you have provided.
    credit repair companies

    ReplyDelete
  101. Remarkable blog! I have no words to praise, it has really allured me.
    queens central booking

    ReplyDelete
  102. Your blogs and its stuff magnetize me to return again n again. replica watches uk

    ReplyDelete
  103. Your contents are wonderful and recommended.

    free video software

    ReplyDelete
  104. icest information!!! I'll be enchanted to greatly help due to what I've learnt from here.
    vietnam holiday

    ReplyDelete
  105. This is an informative blog by which I have got that info which I really wanted to get.
    vietnam holiday

    ReplyDelete
  106. Great blogs buddy……… this will definitely assist me.
    vietnam travel

    ReplyDelete
  107. What a great blog it is!!! You are in truth on your way to colossal success. Well done. bubblegum casting reviews

    ReplyDelete
  108. It is extremely nice to see the greatest details presented in an easy and understanding manner. bubblegum casting reviews

    ReplyDelete
  109. Great webpage brother I am about to notify this to all of my friends and contacts.
    vietnam holiday

    ReplyDelete
  110. I went over this website and I conceive you've got a large number of splendid information,
    vietnam travel

    ReplyDelete
  111. I think I have really come on the right place for getting the perfect info.exposed skin care

    ReplyDelete
  112. The blog is good enough, keep up writing such type of posts.
    sewing kit

    ReplyDelete
  113. Your articles are actually inclusive signified out of respectively theme. buy good seo

    ReplyDelete
  114. That's a nice place of you; we have been polishing off there. buy good seo

    ReplyDelete
  115. Having seen your blogs, I really enjoyed going through them.
    weight loss pills that work

    ReplyDelete
  116. I desire lots of articles and blogs please upload soon.
    credit repair

    ReplyDelete
  117. The complete blogs are really inconceivable and definitely everyone will share this information.

    home security system

    ReplyDelete
  118. This blog site has really a huge collection of articles with impressive information.vietnam holiday

    ReplyDelete
  119. It’s really very informative that I wanted ever, thanks for this.vietnam travel

    ReplyDelete
  120. Waooow!!! Really very cool site of blogs. You can imagine what you have done for me.vietnam holiday

    ReplyDelete
  121. Thanks a lot for publishing the new good stuff for us. I’ll really get the great advantage from your good stuff.vietnam tour

    ReplyDelete
  122. Hello, this is fastidious post I actually loved reading this.
    electrician brisbane southside

    ReplyDelete
  123. I read your blogs regularly. Your humoristic way is amusing, continue the good work!
    New York Arraignment Lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  124. You have done really a superb job with your web site. Marvelous stuff is here to read.

    central booking queens

    ReplyDelete
  125. An enormous round of applause, continue the great work. criminal lawyer ny

    ReplyDelete
  126. These articles and blogs are certainly sufficient for me personally for a day. criminal lawyer ny

    ReplyDelete
  127. This text can assist the internet folks for creating new web site or even a weblog from start to finish. check these guys out

    ReplyDelete
  128. You fully match our expectation and the selection of our data.
    click for source

    ReplyDelete
  129. Hey to everyone, it’s my first visit of the blog site; this blog includes awesome and actually best info for the visitors.click reference

    ReplyDelete
  130. Waooow!!! Magnificent blogs, this is what I wanted to search. Thanks buddy
    best credit repair companies

    ReplyDelete
  131. I dead consider blissful once I get articles relatable to my subject. phlebotomy training

    ReplyDelete
  132. I love all details that you give in your articles.
    family life insurance

    ReplyDelete
  133. That’s a nice site you people are carrying out there. sky blue credit repair reviews

    ReplyDelete
  134. If you should be opting for finest contents like me, just visit this blog site daily because it provides the feature contents, thanks.
    best philips electric shavers

    ReplyDelete
  135. I Never ever found such edifying blogs.

    book online

    ReplyDelete
  136. I get pleasure from reading and revalue your changes.

    best electric shaver reviews

    ReplyDelete
  137. Stupendous blog you guys have provided there, I will absolutely valuate your effort.phlebotomist

    ReplyDelete
  138. congratulations guys, quality information you have given!!! Kansas City SEO

    ReplyDelete
  139. Your contents provide me a lot of creative suggestions that I can seemingly utilize on my web page too.
    Philips Norelco 1160x Review

    ReplyDelete
  140. Your website is for sure worth bookmarking.
    vegetable recipes

    ReplyDelete
  141. Your website is for sure worth bookmarking.
    vegetable recipes

    ReplyDelete
  142. I’m glad to locate so much of informative data in your blog.Timothy Church

    ReplyDelete
  143. I want to say thank to you people for this great and helpful info. Thanks!!!
    cancer symptoms

    ReplyDelete
  144. how to lose man boobsHi I was searching for the blogs for many times, now I have reached at the right place.

    ReplyDelete
  145. Every day I visit a number of blog sites to see content, however this offers quality based content.credit repair

    ReplyDelete
  146. Your writers are extremely fantastic that have made easy to understand everything for us.

    vivint review

    ReplyDelete
  147. Great blog post! I don’t understand how long it will require me to obtain through all of them!
    buy facebook fans

    ReplyDelete
  148. I really delight in whilst I go through your blogs and articles. http://realfacebooklike.com/

    ReplyDelete
  149. Hey to everyone, it’s my first visit of the blog site; this blog includes awesome and actually best info for the visitors.ovation credit

    ReplyDelete
  150. low cholesterol diets
    It feels awe-inspiring to read such informative and distinctive articles on your websites.

    ReplyDelete
  151. Remarkable blog! I have no words to praise, it has really allured me. best home security system

    ReplyDelete
  152. Now this is in actual fact cooperative. It’s very openhanded of you to share this with us.

    Vivint Security

    ReplyDelete
  153. That's a nice place of you; we have been polishing off there. buying facebook likes

    ReplyDelete
  154. Great blog you people have made here on this blog site, I will absolutely appreciate your work.

    online tutorial

    ReplyDelete
  155. I thought haven’t read such distinctive material anywhere else on-line.

    Vivint Security

    ReplyDelete
  156. congratulations guys, quality information you have given!!! villas online

    ReplyDelete
  157. Quickly this site will indisputably be famous among all blogging people, because of its fastidious articles or reviews.
    exposed skin care reviews

    ReplyDelete
  158. congratulations guys, quality information you have given!!! best electric shaver reviews

    ReplyDelete
  159. Hi Dear, have you been certainly visiting this site daily, if that's the case you then will certainly get good knowledge. loans in kentucky

    ReplyDelete
  160. Your blogs are truly awesome I have no words to praise for your blogs.luxury Villas Marrakech

    ReplyDelete
  161. I agree. You have made the nice blogs with the great info in the contents.luxury Villas Marrakech

    ReplyDelete
  162. congratulations guys, quality information you have given!!! small payday loans

    ReplyDelete
  163. Hmmmm…. The most widely innovative information at your site has impressed lots of the people including me and my friends. magma atomizer

    ReplyDelete
  164. Provided blogs and articles looking very supportive for us. online tutoring service

    ReplyDelete
  165. Your website is terribly informative and your articles are wonderful. home security systems

    ReplyDelete
  166. Your website is terribly informative and your articles are wonderful. home security systems

    ReplyDelete
  167. home securityI want to say thank to you people for this great and helpful info. Thanks!!!

    ReplyDelete
  168. Having seen your blogs, I really enjoyed going through them. paycheck loans

    ReplyDelete
  169. Your articles don’t beat about the bushes these are actually exact t to the purpose. best electric shaver blog

    ReplyDelete
  170. I think I have never seen such blogs ever before that has complete things with all details which I want. So kindly update this ever for us. credit repair

    ReplyDelete
  171. Great webpage buddy, I am going to notify this to all my friends and contacts as well.cost of labioplasty

    ReplyDelete
  172. I have been really impressed by going through this awesome blog. How to lose stomach fat

    ReplyDelete
  173. Your articles are extremely fit and approved and incomparable.
    hajj visa

    ReplyDelete
  174. This is really quite informative blog such qualitative info I have never seen anywhere.
    elevator shoes

    ReplyDelete
  175. frontpoint
    Nobody can reject the info you have given in the blogs, this is actually a great work.

    ReplyDelete
  176. adt review
    The writer understand better the mind of people what they want to learn through their writing therefore this article is outstanding. Thanks!!!

    ReplyDelete
  177. Beef jerky wholesale
    Hey buddies, such a marvelous blog you have made I’m surprised to read such informative stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  178. best credit
    Thanks a lot for publishing the new good stuff for us. I’ll really get the great advantage from your good stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  179. ovation credit repair reviews
    Pretty! It was really a wonderful blog. Thanks for the provided information.

    ReplyDelete
  180. best electric shaver reviews
    Your blog is such like that I have run out of words!!! Really superb

    ReplyDelete
  181. Your contents are a lot more than adequate for me. Live streaming

    ReplyDelete
  182. braun series 7 790cc pulsonic shaver system review
    Your blogs have allured me a lot. I’ll again visit this great site to get more valuable stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  183. dentist reseda
    I truly get pleasure from while I read your blogs and its content.

    ReplyDelete
  184. credit repair companies
    A great job you have already done. I’m really delighted to see your amazing work.

    ReplyDelete
  185. NY Medicaid fraud attorney
    It is extremely nice to see the greatest details presented in an easy and understanding manner.

    ReplyDelete
  186. teluate
    Great blogs buddy……… this will definitely assist me.

    ReplyDelete
  187. top seo firm
    I’m impressed with the special and informative contents that you just offer in such short timing.

    ReplyDelete
  188. auto insurance quotes
    I feel happiness to read the content that you are posting.

    ReplyDelete
  189. write my essay
    You entirely go with our expectation and the range of our information.

    ReplyDelete
  190. Panda Designs
    I am confident you've got a great enthusiast following there.

    ReplyDelete
  191. I went over this website and I conceive you've got a large number of splendid information,
    who's calling me

    ReplyDelete