From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Saturday, July 2, 2011


Congressional records reveal a viral premeditation within the liberal ranks of our government to alter fundamental Constitutional eligibility protections in order to covertly assist an ineligible Obama candidacy and his usurpation of America’s executive power.

by Penbrook Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen

Some diseases are so viral, so invasive, so insidious, so contagious…that they eventually infect what most would believe is the most sanitary part of any body. Even the once honored sovereignty of America’s highest legislative body is now coming under the attack of the disease of multi-culturalism and liberal extremism.

Congressional records show that on eight separate occasions over six years, between 2003 and 2008, legislators attempted to eliminate or change the definition of the “Natural Born” eligibility clause of Article 2 of the Constitution in order to remove restrictions and, thereby, create legal justifications supporting Obama’s unlawful candidacy for President.

We now know what members of congress knew about Obama’s ineligibility, and when they knew it.

In a recently produced documentary, Carl Gallups, a senior pastor at Hickory Hammock Baptist Church for more than two decades with a ten year professional background in law enforcement, presents documented evidence showing that members of congress submitted repetitive, coordinated proposals to alter the 'natural-born' eligibility clause.

Gallups also serves on the board of regents at the University of Mobile and hosts several weekly radio programs in the northwest Florida region.

Gallups’ documentary shows that between June 11, 2003 until Feb. 28, 2008, there were eight attempts to circumvent the Natural-born eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution.

1. On June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Arkansas, introduced House Joint Resolution 59 (HJR 59) which attempted to Constitutionally change the understood historical definition of a ‘natural-born’ eligibility for the U.S. Presidency in order to "permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.” The resolution did not make it to a senate vote at that time.

2. Then, on Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Michigan, introduced HJR67, which would have defined presidential eligibility the same as Snyder's proposal, only the requirement to be a citizen in Conyers’ bill was actually lowered to 20 years, not the more stringent 35 years. Conyers’ bill was also rebuffed prior to an official vote. However, the introduction of two such proposals within a mere four month period reveals that Congressional leadership was conscious of the issue of Presidential eligibility prior to Obama’s candidacy. Whether these acts were put into motion at this time specifically for the benefit of Obama, exclusively, is unclear, but highly suspicious.

3. Then, in an attempt to contend with the obvious attack against the natural born citizenship clause, on Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Oklahoma, introduced Senate Bill 2128 which also failed to hit the eligibility requirement target. It defined a ‘natural-born citizen’ as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States.” This was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution. Exhibiting the same ignorance as other legislators, Nickles failed to acknowledge that the intended purpose of the natural-born eligibility clause was to ensure that the sovereignty, identity and loyalty of a presidential candidate was measured by not only a geographic birth under the protection of the U.S. Constitution but also the possession of natural natal biology afforded by birth to TWO parents who are U.S. citizens at the time of conception AND the preservation of the continuity of that citizenship status until election.

Five months later, on July 27, 2004, Barack Obama delivered his keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention which essentially and suddenly made America aware of him at a national level.

4. Then, just two months later, on Sept. 15, 2004, House Representative Dana Rohrabacher, R-California, submitted HJR 104, which audaciously attempted "to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years." Rohrabacher’s fallow resolution attempted to completely ignore the Constitution’s requirement that a president had to be a natural born citizen. The resolution was rejected on its face.

5. Four months later, on Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers pushed yet another unwanted attempt to change the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ in HJR 02, which was the exact same as Rohrabacher's.

6. Just one month later, on Feb. 1, 2005, Rohrabacher submitted a revised version of her previous resolution in HJR 15 which would require only 20 years of citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

7. Two months later, on April 14, 2005, Snyder resubmitted his bill under another proposal, HJR42, requiring 35 years of U.S. citizenship to be eligible. Interestingly, it has long since been established that Barack Obama’s return to the U.S. from Indonesia took place in approximately 1970-1971. At that time, if Obama had re-naturalized as a U.S. Citizen, this resolution would have made him just eligible in 2005.
Barack Obama announced his candidacy for the U.S. presidency on February 10, 2007.
The Iowa Caucus is held on January 3, 2008.

8. Finally, in Feb. 28, 2008, after seven failures to change the natural-born eligibility requirement, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., attempted to parasite SB 2678 with the Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what "natural-born citizen" includes. Obama and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors of this bill.

Liberal democrats in Congress were in an obvious array to push against this long-standing Constitutional mandate at the time, coincidentally, when the first unnatural born presidential candidate, Barack Obama, began his political career at the national level. Why? Who or what was pulling their strings?

As reported by Bob Unruh of World Net Daily, Gallups’ documentary then demonstrates that “..on April 10, 2008, being "unable to alter or remove" the natural-born eligibility requirement for Barack Obama..", the Senate engaged an active deception by distracting the growing consciousness of Obama’s ineligibility by introducing Senate Resolution 511, which addressed Sen. John McCain's qualifications as a ‘natural-born citizen.’

Overcompensating for their failure to validate Obama, the Senate feigned generosity for McCain in hopes of making his eligibility the target of attention, but not criticism, by declaring him eligible as a “natural born citizen”. Senate leadership desired to avoid making McCain's eligibility the subject of criticism because they knew that if McCain was not eligible, Barack Obama was certainly not eligible. The weight of scrutiny against a worthier McCain would have caused Obama's campaign to fail, politically, if not legally.

However, in what can only be described as complete legislative incompetence, SR511 writers and sponsors specifically stated McCain was eligible because he was "...born in a territory under treaty with the U.S." and, therefore, under the protection of the U.S. Constitution and, most importantly, "because he was the son of TWO U.S. citizen parents." The language of Resolution 511 actually and explicitly commits McCain to presidential eligibility because of the citizenship of his parentage. Both of McCain's parents were U.S. citizens. This is a qualification which Barack Obama does not possess.

Shockingly, Obama voted in favor of Resolution 511 knowing he, himself, was not eligible under these same metrics. Barack Obama voted in favor of a formal resolution stating that a presidential candidate was Constitutionally eligible because the candidate was defined as being ‘natural born’ by the fact that the candidate’s birth was, in fact, to TWO U.S. citizen parent. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen and his mother was only 18 at the time of his birth which disqualified transfer of citizenship if the birth occurred outside the U.S
Obama's qualifications were never reviewed or conferred upon under any similar resolution, nor were his qualifications to be president ever vetted by any federal authority, legislative body or formal inquiry, as were John McCain’s. Not ever.

Unruh continues: “After his election, Gallups points out, Obama held a secret meeting with eight of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court – from which no public information was released. The meeting was held even though there were legal challenges in which Obama was a defendant pending before the Supreme Court at the time. The attorneys for the plaintiffs never were told of the meeting or invited to participate in what critics have described as extrajudicial contact between the court and a defendant.”

Consider this very carefully, sons and daughters of vintage America. Barack Obama, an illegally appointed president under suspicion of violating the U.S. Constitution, actually engaged personal contact with eight sitting supreme court judges who were actively considering pending cases regarding his ineligibility as president, in covert meetings, without the presence of any opposing legal representation. The suspect was allowed to meet alone with very authorities who were presiding in law suits against him, who have the supreme legal power to dismiss, overrule or uphold these lawsuits with binding jurisdictions, without any record of the content or accounting of attendance of those meetings, and without any representation of those filing complaints against him.
This level of corruption and judicial tampering is unprecedented in American history.

Ironically, only Justice Scalia, the longest serving conservatively oriented judge, appointed by Republican President, Ronald Reagan, in 1986, was absent from this secret meeting. Scalia has often been hailed as the "conservative intellectual anchor" of the supreme court. If any one of the nine supreme court justices would have held opposition to Obama's illegal presidency, Scalia would be the first. He was either not allowed in the meeting, or recused himself for reasons of deniability about the subject.

Unruh continues, “WND previously reported on another link between Obama and a campaign to change the constitutional provision. It came from an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then-Sen. Barack Obama. She advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic."

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy was listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cited his membership on the finance committees for both Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., on the corporate website.

The article by Herlihy was available online under law review articles from Kent University when it originally was the subject of reports but later was removed.

Herlihy's published paper reveals that the requirement likely was considered in a negative light by organizations linked to Obama in the months before he announced in 2007 his candidacy for the presidency.

The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the "stupidest provision" in the Constitution, "undecidedly un-American," "blatantly discriminatory" and the "Constitution's worst provision," Herlihy begins in her introduction to the paper titled "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle."

She concludes that the "emotional" reasons to oppose changing the Constitution will prevail over the "rational" reasons demanding a change.

The current American perceptions about the effects of globalization and the misunderstanding about what globalization actually is will result in Americans deciding that naturalized citizens should not be president because this would, in effect, be promoting globalization, Herlihy wrote.

"Although this argument is admittedly circular, because globalization is the thing that makes the need to abolish the requirement more and more persuasive, Americans' subsequent perceptions about globalization are the very things that will prevent Americans from embracing the idea of eliminating the natural born requirement.
"Logical Americans are looking for a reason to ignore the rational reasons promoted by globalization so that they may vote based on their own emotions and instincts," she wrote.

In the body of her argument, Herlihy said the constitutional provision simply is outdated.

"Considering that the Founding Fathers presumably included the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution partly out of fear of foreign subversion, the current stability of the American government and the intense media scrutiny of presidential candidates virtually eliminates the possibility of a 'foreigner' coming to America, becoming a naturalized citizen, generating enough public support to become president, and somehow using the presidency to directly benefit his homeland," she wrote.

"The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is outdated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty," she wrote.

Many of the reasons for keeping the limit, she wrote, "are based primarily on emotion."

Or, Ms. Herlihy, perhaps you must be forced to accept that it was simply a wise measure correctly foreseen as necessary to prevent a lying, criminal usurper, perhaps like Barack Obama, from assuming power over the value, work and lives of the greatest people in world history. There is nothing outdated in any doctrine devised to preserve that.

Is there no limit to the degeneracy of this current political roster into which they will descend in order to acheive their psychotic agenda and control over the blood-ransomed freedom, value and power of the only true decent and prosperous people of humanity?

Wake up, vintage America. Your nation is under attack from within. Liars and deceivers are stealing your daily lives, creeping closer into your personal boundaries and mocking the screaming blood of your pristine warriors.

It is time all who consider themselves decent and sovereign to reject Barack Obama as the criminal usurper that he is.


  1. A 4th of July Message from … We the People | Almost 10,000,000 Views! | by Nospopulus |@ YouTube.

    We have a criminal and forger in the White House:

    I Believe The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election and The Cover Up is Still Going Strong and Has Created The Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis!

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret).

  2. I call for a national protest against the conspiracy from within.

    Rally to the cause of freedom in righteous indignation, violent vocal protest, and bitter silence under the flag of Mississippi at the use of Federal troops. This today is a disgrace to the nation in 'dire peril,' a disgrace beyond the capacity of anyone except its enemies.

    This is the conspiracy of the crucifixion by anti-Christ conspirators of the Supreme Court in their denial of prayer and their betrayal of a nation.

    Maj. Gen. Edwin Walker
    Mississippi, September 29, 1963 in the Kennedy misuse of federal troops to invade Mississippi over segregation which led to bloody riot and murder.
    Oh and the same Kennedy administration which anointed this fraud documented Mr. Obama, incarcerated Gen. Walker for being insane.

    His insanity? The charge from Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy was being Conservative like Barry Goldwater.

    This overthrowing of the American Republic has been taking place a very long time.

  3. For those on this thread who may not have seen it, there is a new, updated report out from Paul Irey, a typography and type face expert.

    New Report -- Presentation of the Evidence: The American Typewriter – Obama’s ‘Typed’ Long Form Birth Certificate is Forged | by Paul Irey – Type Face Expert

    Read and download your own copy of Paul Irey’s New Full Report Here. Please post the link and circulate this new report as widely as you can. Email, postal mail, or FAX it to your Congress members. Get them this new information and report which is independent of the analysis of the PDF file manipulation analysis and was done on the flattened JPG image ciruclated by AP and the press. I have sent it to my reps in Congress and key committee leaders and of course Speaker Boehner. We need to keep pounding on them in addition to all else we are doing. Here is the link to get the new report:

    * * * *

    My comments: We Have a Criminal and Forger in the White House! Why Isn’t Speaker John Boehner Investigating? Call or Write and Ask Him Why He’s Not Investigating! Boehner Needs to Stop Whining and Obfuscating and Lead. Demand an Investigation be Started by the U.S. House of Reps That He Leads! – 27 Jun 2011 Wash Times National Weekly pg 5. See and Get a Copy of the Ad Here:​l-and-Forger-in-the-White-​House-20110627-issue-Wash-​Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-5

    Further proof the Obama long form BC from another expert, Doug Vogt a digital image and scanner expert, that Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate that was posted on the White House servers and of which xerox copies were given to reporters on 27 April 2011 is a forgery:​58721290/Obama-Birth-Certificate-Final-Affidavit-of-Douglas-Vogt-June-24-2011-Total-of-9-items-now-liste​d

    Flattened or layered the "birthday caked up document" Obama proffered to the world on 27 Apr 2011 via the digital manufactured PDF file and via the xerox copies handed out to the reporter is a FORGERY!

    This is not a fringe issue of concern by only a few Americans. In the latest poll, 50% of the American people said they want Obama investigated by the Congress. It is time for U.S. House Speaker Boehner to take action and call for investigations in the House of Reps of Obama’s criminal activities:​d=314585

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

  4. G. Gordon Liddy Radio Show: Joe Farah Interviews Susan Daniels (Private Investigator)- Obama’s Stolen Connecticut Social Security Number « CDR Kerchner's Blog.

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret).

  5. I'm going to lay this out again. The Constitution does not provide a definition of "Natural Born Citizen". The Supreme Court has stated that there is no document which describes / provides law in the US which supercedes the Constitution. The Courts and Constitution say that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Period. Congress was empowered to define citizenship and has provided by law (Title 5 sect 1401) for 2 types of citizens: 1) Citizenship by birth 2) Citizenship by naturaliation. We must conclude, therfore, that "Natural born citizen" and "Citizen by birth" (as defined bythe olaw) are one and the same. So, acording to the law, Barak Obama is a citizen by birth (NBC) - unless it can be shown that Ann Stanley Dunham is not his biological mother. Minimum requirement for "Citizen by birth" is for one parent to be US Citizen at time of birth (anywhere on the planet and maybe in the Universe at large) and to have lived in US for 10 yrs with 5 yrs being before age of 14. Read the US code! The article is pointless armwaving by folks engaging in very wishful thinking.

    1. Grant; I must respectfully disagree with your analysis and offer you an excerpt from a work in progress;

      "...NOW COMES Plaintiff, Steven Lee Craig, Claiming to be of Constitutionally recognized form of Citizenship known as Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America under the definition as found to be deductible from the Lawful expressions of the U.S. Congress in performance of the enumerated power instructed by the Constitution at Article I Section VIII Clause IV, “...To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …throughout the United States;…”, as enacted, 1790 Naturalization Act (An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization) Sess. II, Chap. 3; 1 stat 103. 1st Congress; March 26, 1790; and; 1795 Naturalization Act (An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject) Sess. II, Chap. 19, 20; 1 stat 414. 3rd Congress; January 29, 1795. ; (hereinafter the (“Acts”)..."

      Please consider that the "uniform Rules of naturalization" were established in 1790 and reiterated in 1795. Before being able to 'extend' the benefit of citizenship to 'aliens' there must 1st be a 'specimen' of what those being naturalized are to be 'considered as', those were the then existing citizens and the 'contemplated and provided for "natural born Citizens with ALL others beieng thereafter known as "aliens" whether 'native born" or 'foreign born immigrants.

      I understand that it takes a little while to wrap ones mind around the premise, it took me 3 yrs. I place much of the blame on Justice Waite with those infamous words; "...for that resort must be made elsewhere..."

      But in time I came to realize that when a Judge/Justice is asked a specific question of Law they are OBLIGATED to 1st see what the Constitution says, along with intent, and then MUST look to what the Congress has said on the SPECIFIC question, then they may go afield to prior Opinions and historical sources.

      I and most of us who have been searching have done so in the reverse.

      Now, your assignment is to find the Amendment that reconciles the two citizen requisite circumstance with one 'citizen' parent and one "alien foreign national', but I am confident that your intellectually honest determination will find that the "0" falls under the 'collective naturalization provisions' of Tile 8 @ 1401 et seq.

  6. BTW Grant E., The USCode citation you gave, Title 5 @1401 makes for an interesting subject in the study of Fruedian style Fo Pa's;

    5 USC § 1401 - Establishment of agency Chief Human Capital Officers

    The head of each agency referred to under paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 901 (b) of title 31 shall appoint or designate a Chief Human Capital Officer, who shall—
    (1) advise and assist the head of the agency and other agency officials in carrying out the agency’s responsibilities for selecting, developing, training, and managing a high-quality, productive workforce in accordance with merit system principles;
    (2) implement the rules and regulations of the President and the Office of Personnel Management and the laws governing the civil service within the agency; and
    (3) carry out such functions as the primary duty of the Chief Human Capital Officer.

  7. Ms Herlihy wrote: "Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is outdated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty,".

    The ignorance is almost universal regarding what a natural citizen is. She fights for naturalized foreigners while unwittingly ignoring domestic born foreigners naturalized automatically at birth by the Supreme Court's re-interpretation of the 14th Amendment. They are the only citizens for whom birthplace is a requirement for citizenship, but she ignorantly ignored the 97% who are natural American citizens by descent from American citizens. Only they are citizens *by birth*. 14th Amendment citizens are merely citizens *at birth* or from birth since their citizenship is not connected to the nature of their birth but to where it happened. Having happened within the U.S. they are covered by the naturalizing authority of the amendment, as long as their parents are immigrants and not mere foreign guests of the U.S. government.
    learn a heck of a lot more at obama--nation. com