From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Saturday, September 15, 2012


OCTOBER SURPRISE 3.0:  With the 2012 election looming, legal analysts formerly with the Social Security Administration predict Obama will “triple down” on the birth certificate fraud by displaying a forged paper version of the document.  Under the weight of mounting ballot challenges and an onslaught of citizen journalists who have effectively exposed Obama’s prolific lies, Obama’s only option, they say, is for the criminals propagating the epic deception about Obama’s illegitimacy as president is to “frankenstein” one more doozy of a lie…bigger than all the one’s before it!
By Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen

NEW YORK, NY – It’s always quietest before the storm…and darkest before the dawn.  Get ready, America…here it comes. 
Former claims analysts for the social security administration and researchers working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the forged image of Obama’s alleged 1961 birth certificate have resolved, preemptively, that the roster of counterfeit evidence supporting Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president is about to get one more addition…a counterfeit paper version of Obama’s birth certificate. 
For almost a year and a half, the counterfeited image of Obama’s alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth has been repeatedly and effectively discredited as a forgery by law enforcement investigators, computer experts, software analysts and neo-journalists.  During that time, questions have been raised about the image’s content as well as its origins and chain of custody.  Most damaging to the image’s credibility as an authentic representation of Obama’s natal history, however, is the fact that it is not a paper document but, rather, has been proven to be a .pdf file produced sometime after two paper copies of the record were allegedly released to Obama attorneys by the State of Hawaii in April, 2011. 
Now, a recent ballot challenge in Kansas has brought another course of the same valid but unanswered questions regarding Obama’s failure to provide credible, authentic, corroborated documented evidence that he is Constitutionally eligible to serve as president.  For more than four years, liberal operatives and media abettors have toiled to protect Obama while ridiculing anyone seeking the truth about this matter.  Kansas officials have determined there is reason to question Obama’s eligibility on their ballot.  
A recent request by investigators to the state of Hawaii specifically, for an officially certified .pdf digital copy of a birth certificate of a Hawaiian-born member of the research team was met with Hawaiian Health Department officials stating that they “do not provide, nor have they ever provided” any digital computer versions of official birth certificates.  

Therefore, the problem for  counterfeiters of the Obama birth certificate image is that the state of Hawaii did not authorize the creation of the .pdf file, nor did the state of Hawaii create the .pdf. image for display on the internet, by anyone.  It is upon this fact that forgers will attempt to pass off a forged paper document which they will claim is the actual certified paper copy of the original held by the state of Hawaii and which was originally allegedly created for Obama in 1961, say legal analysts. 
“Of course they are going to do this,” says TDP editor, Pen Johannson, “it is their only option.  They must descend deeper into this lie because the truth is beginning to destroy their psychotic delusions of Obama’s grandeur.  The truth is killing them.  After all, they are dissonant liars condemned to defend a perishing dilemma.  We are winning this silent war on darkness and principalities.”  
The very fact that the image of an alleged government document was digitally fabricated and posted to a government website means the image, at some time between issuance and posting, was forged by unidentified individuals working for Obama, not an official agency with authority to certify such a file format.  Therefore, the content of the image cannot be relied upon as a accurate representation of the content in the official copies allegedly issued by the State of Hawaii in April, 2011.
Moreover, the reprobates working that which is unseemly within the mainstream media have continuously defended the false image as “Obama’s long-form birth certificate”, even after a 10 month criminal investigation by Maricopa County Sheriff, Joe Arpaio presented evidence the document not only contained falsified information but also that it was never authenticated by the State of Hawaii. 

The teeth-gnashing truth for Obots is, simply, the image posted on the website is a counterfeit because the very fact that it is a digital image and not a paper document. 

In their abetment of Obama’s lies, the media has willfully and intentionally refused to acknowledge that the state of Hawaii did not produce the .pdf file posted to the official government media source,  The State of Hawaii only provided certified copies of the birth certificate in paper form.
“Jesus told us that if a man testifies about himself, the testimony is not valid,” continued Johannson. 
“This laughable image is the holy grail of testimony about Obama’s eligibility…provided by Obama!  The simple fact that media and government allowed this man to into American government speaks volumes of how far this nation’s leadership structure has fallen, and how corrupt government has become.  Pathetic.  Truly and ungodly pathetic.”          
For the past half decade, supporters of Obama have vigorously issued a pile of worthless explanations to excuse Obama’s illegitimacy as president.  However, no excuse has come close to explaining the unprecedented number of so-called “clerical errors” claimed by these Obots as reasons for Obama’s absurd, completely farcical, biographical documentation.  Here are a just few of those vigorously defended “clerical miscues”.
1.    Obama’s Connecticut-based social security number was issued as a result of a misinterpretation of his Hawaiian zip code by the social security administration…when he was 16 years old.  Hawaii’s zip code, in which Obama did not live, was 96814 while one zip code somewhere in Connecticut is 06814.  Yes, and there is a zip code in another state, 26814 and one in another, 66814 and another in another, 86814.  But, Obama’s social security number came from the only state where social security numbers are issued without requiring documented proof of citizenship at birth, in which he never resided or visited.    
2.    Obama’s birth certificate is registered with a file number which was mistakenly assigned by a Department of Health clerk who stamped the number in the wrong batch of certificates.   Amazingly, Obama’s birth certificate is the only one in Hawaiian history to be mis-stamped and allowed to proceed through coding and natal statistics documentation.  Not only were birth certificates process for the National Center for Health Statistics based on their even-number,   Hawaiian birth certificates were numbered in the order they are received from five regional offices in 1961, not chronological order of the birth date. 
3.    Obama’s Selective Service registration was mistakenly stamped by a postal worker as being received from Obama a day before the actual day he signed it.  Wait, what?  Either that, or Obama mistakenly signed the form with the wrong date.  The problem with this lame excuse is that the selective service administration refuses to accept a selective service registration with any errors.  Any mistakes are caught by the postal worker and the form is discarded forcing the registrant to fill out another form before it is personally received by the postal worker verifying the official identity of the individual by requesting a driver’s license or, you guessed it, a U.S. birth certificate. 
4.    Obama’s Official Certificate of Nomination (OCON) from the Democratic National Committee and the State of Hawaii Democrat Party contains a misspelled word which was not caught by editors of the form even when the form was altered later to hide the fact that legally required language was left out of the form signed by Nancy Pelosi. 
5.    The year of Obama’s father’s birth is not clear.  He was apparently born sometime between 1934 and 1936 based on information provided in several document sources from the INS, the State of Hawaii and the University of Hawaii.  In one source document, his birthday is listed as 1934.  In another its listed as 1936. 
The problem with these clerical errors is that they all exist with regard to the documented history of a single man.  One might expect one or two errors in official documentation about an individual, but the utter volume and repetition of such errors and cover-ups in Obama’s case has made him a laughing stock, a joke to be mocked and derided with unassailable justification.  This is what our presidency has been allowed to become.
“They want to put an end to doubts about Obama's identity once and for all before the election.  The only way to do this is 'triple-down' on this most heinous and disdainful document deception against innocent people,” concludes Johannson.
“Tragically, this ‘final solution’ in defense of Obama's fraudulent presidency will be the final and definitive dividing line between vintage American heritage and this enemy horde.  At the very moment this document is implemented onto the American public, the revolution begins in earnest. The debating is over.  The discussion goes dark and silent.  Arms are left as the only viable option for defending the sovereignty of America.  What a sad place we have come to.“
John 5  
31 “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. 32 There is another who testifies in my favor, and I know that his testimony about me is true.

33 “You have sent to John and he has testified to the truth. 34 Not that I accept human testimony; but I mention it that you may be saved. 35 John was a lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light.

36 “I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to finish—the very works that I am doing—testify that the Father has sent me. 37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, 38 nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent. 39 You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, 40 yet you refuse to come to me to have life.

41 “I do not accept glory from human beings, 42 but I know you. I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts. 43 I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him. 44 How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God?

45 “But do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses (the law), on whom your hopes are set. 46 If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. 47 But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?”


  1. The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
    “Food For Thought”
    Semper Fi!

  2. As Fl ss. 102.168(1) (3) (b) shows, Florida electors have the right to challenge the eligibility of "ANY PERSON" whom is "NOMINATED OR ELECTED" to office.

    Even if no primary is held, the unopposed candidate shall be considered "NOMINATED" for the office.

    "101.252 Candidates entitled to have names printed on certain ballots; exception.—(1) Any candidate for nomination who has qualified as prescribed by law is entitled to have his or her name printed on the official primary election ballot. However, when there is only one candidate of any political party qualified for an office, the name of the candidate shall not be printed on the primary election ballot, and such candidate shall be declared nominated for the office."

    Further, Federal Election statute (11 C.F.R. 100.2(C)(5)) says that the election is "considered to have occurred" if there is an unopposed major party candidate whom shall appear on the general election ballot. So Florida statutes agreee with Federal statutes.

    Therefore by Fl. ss. 102.168(1)(3)(b) I have standing, and the Supreme Court of Fla. has said that "eligibility is a judicial determination upon any challenge properly made" (Shevin v. Stone(1972))

    My action is properly made as to time, indispensible parties, claimant status, and venue. Therefore this action is properly made, and the court is obliged to make a ruling as to the eligibility of Barack H. Obama

    Appeal Brief filed yesterday.