The Liberal Defection Begins: With the collapse of green jobs darling, Solyndra and GE's growing struggles in the alternative energy market, Obama's illegitimate presidency is manifesting with destructive consequences to leftist interests and personal welfare of former liberal media propagandists, like David Brooks of the New York Times. Now, he, and many like him in the media are seeking asylum in the graces of repentant contrition. Unfortunately, for Brooks, simply admitting he was wrong does not repair the damage done by his passive egress to Obama.
commentary by Pen Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
New York, NY - As hard as I try, I can’t bring myself to imagine Obama shedding a tear when he is forced to admit that he is the greatest fraud in history.
To creatures like Obama, failure to maintain a deception about his nefarious identity is simply a bump in the long ideological road upon which such a radical cause for twisted justice slowly crawls. As ghosts like Obama pass away, the evil cause is simply taken up by the next radical change agent who happens to fall in the hole left after reckless incompetence is momentarily eradicated.
Obama is nothing to those controlling this epic story. He is just one of a slew of humanity’s failed liars possessing delusions of grandeur about creating his own world upon the equity of others.
Obama's sense of entitlement to determine what is fair for all is rooted in his birth. Conceived in bi-racial illegitimacy by a wayward teenage mother and a foreign, dead-beat, alchoholic womanizer, Obama was born with an identity he did not want. Rather than beholding himself as a whole person of multicultural merit, he became entrenched in liberal radicalism and, thereby, chose to attach his worth to a false understanding about his racially half-bred, disadvantaged youth. This identity spoke a message of inferiority, not equality, to him. As a result, Obama is afraid of being seen as inferior. One only needs to examine his inflated language and over educated contempt for vintage, white American heritage.
A perfect example of this delusion is Obama's myopic insistance that the only possible way to implement fairness in taxation between the rates paid by secretaries and the millionaires who employ them is to increase the rates of those he believes don't pay their fair share. This liberal tenet exposes such a blind spot in Obama it is laughable, which is this:
Why is it that Obama's only considered option in implementing tax fairness is to RAISE the taxes of the American's he thinks are not paying their fair share. How about the novel concept of LOWERING the taxes of those he thinks pay too much?
This is what liberalism does to the human mind. It corrupts it...blinds it and then it destroys it.
Herman Cain's declaration of his GOP candidacy against Obama will soon demonstrate a reaction from the liberal establishment which will further reveal how depraved Obama's kind really are.
Obama’s existence is so threatened by Cain that the communist propaganda media wing of Obama’s illegitimate administration will very soon contrive a story in which sporadic, random and anonymous women or former children will actually and falsely levy their anonymous offendedness at Cain…Knowing all too well the character of liberals, I can confidently say it will most likely be women. They would rather not set the precedence of having anyone look into offenses against children. That hits too close to home for most liberals.
These women will be sought out by Obama’s liberal hacks because they will not come forward on their own either because they are not actually damaged or injured, or because of some former settlement Cain was forced to accept in order to avoid the cost of litigation. No matter what the liberal media packages and sells, the actual truth about these women will be twisted and maimed until the only vile message conveyed by our enemy is that Cain must have certainly committed an act of aggravated rape or sexual assault but for which there will never be any proof of actually happening. The proof of such accusations in this case will be in the twisted minds of those looking through the eyes of those who claim to be offended.
Therefore, my vintage American brothers and sisters, don’t be surprised when, in October or soon thereafter, some liberal media hackshop like MSNBC, ABC or CBS concocts a hit piece against Cain for political reasons but for which no affirming evidence will ever actually surface…Then , calmly remember who the messenger is and that the messenger is the one you should target for deletion from legitimacy, not Cain.
Herman Cain is the proverbial rock being thrown into the pack of liberal dogs. Now, all we have to do is listen for the ones who yelp the loudest and, then, summarily euthanize them.
Obama's inferiority complex is so deep-seated, it prompted him to disseminate the greatest lie in American political history in order to hide the truth about who he really is. The liberal media, including the New York Times, helped him tell that lie by refusing to investigate blatant evidence of Obama's deception.
Apparently, however, some of Obama’s abettors may be having a change of heart.
New York Times Op-Ed columnist and long standing Obama shill, David Brooks is coming to his personal apocalypse over his support for the Chosen One. Brooks, like slews of degenerate leftists who once sold their soul to the idea of a messianic Obama and his message of hope and change, is realizing the a terrible mistake he made.
In his recent op-ed on September 19, 2011, Brooks states, “I’m a sap, a specific kind of sap. I’m an Obama Sap.”
If Brooks were a thinking man, he would have researched the term “SAP” and found that one of its definitions is known to political strategists as a “Self Avoiding Polygon”. This refers to an exercise in which a single line is drawn on a multipoint lattice in a way that connects all the dots but which requires the allowance of gaps in each row and column of dots of the lattice.The concept of "self avoiding gaps" has a significant part in Mr. Brooks' lamentations about the Fallen One, Obama.
Brooks continued, “When the president said the unemployed couldn’t wait 14 more months for help and we had to do something right away, I believed him. When administration officials called around saying that the possibility of a double-dip recession was horrifyingly real and that it would be irresponsible not to come up with a package that could pass right away, I believed them.”
Now Brooks is wondering what other lies and misinformation he may have believed about Obama without actually taking the time to investigate the truth.
Perhaps Brooks believed that Obama was actually eligible to be president. Perhaps he believed that Obama was verified as a Natural Born candidate, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps Brooks was blinded by ideology to such depth and decrepitude that not even he was able to see the teeth-gnashing reality now being wrought by such stored wrath.
Get ready. David Brooks is about to go from a ‘sap’…to an unadulterated ass.
“Yes, I’m a sap,” Brooks states, “I believed Obama when he said he wanted to move beyond the stale ideological debates that have paralyzed this country. I always believe that Obama is on the verge of breaking out of the conventional categories and embracing one of the many bipartisan reform packages that are floating around.”
Brooks, like many liberal abettors, made the initial mistake of taking for granted that Obama was a legitimately qualified candidate. They willfully ignored evidence of Obama's ineligibility because they hated Obama's predecessor so much. Their hatred for Bush was so visceral, it consumed their morality in vengeance. They wanted to see Bush humiliated, damaged or, for very many vile outcasts of the more extreme fringe of the liberal establishment, worse. They would have voted for Charles Manson if it was discovered the convicted mass murderer was a Democrat. Hell, they would have voted for Manson even if he was a Republican. Anyone but Bush to them was worthy. Even a deceiver like Obama.
Clearly disappointed in Obama, Brooks continues by trying to objectify his political rivals, “But remember, I’m a sap. The White House has clearly decided that in a town of intransigent Republicans and mean ideologues, it has to be mean and intransigent too. The president was stung by the liberal charge that he was outmaneuvered during the debt-ceiling fight. So the White House has moved away from the Reasonable Man approach or the centrist Clinton approach.”
I've known Mr. Brooks' work for many years. His capacity for reason is always available but seemingly, inexplicably abbreviated. He remains willfully ignorant about Obama's biographical testimony because he is afraid of what the truth will do to his fragile mind over the subject. Sadly, Brooks also remains perpetually locked in his absurd ideological prison, now trapped with his chosen eternity as an Obama robot.
If I might address Mr. Brooks directly, here’s the universal truth. Republicans aren’t intransigent, as you desperately wish to showcase. Republican stubborness is merely the lame hitch upon which you desperately wish to hook your excuse for Obama. You don't get off that easy. Sorry.
Republicans aren't stubborn, they are just simply right. When you are as right as they are, you don't have to compromise with those who are wrong. You simply only need to appeal to the moral depth of humanity in the course of conveying the simple truth. They are right about America and they are right about Obama, whether they can muster the courage to admit it in public or not.
Republicans didn’t have to “outmaneuver” Obama, as you believe they attempted. Obama was just the fraud by which righteousness achieves distinction. Obama made this easy for conservatives. They were already riding the straight and narrow, albeit bumby, rut in reverse away from the chasm when Obama shifted into "D" and drove the country out of that rut and completely off the cliff. Yes, in his narrative about driving a car, "R" means Reverse to Obama, but reverse is a hell of lot better when your headed over the edge. Obama is shifting us into "D" and giving it gas!
Your corrupted perspective makes it seem like any divergence between Obama and his rivals must, of course, mean that there is maneuvering or erratic positioning going on. However, the tragic, hard truth for lost people like you is that appearance of divergence is just your Obama love train going off the rails into oblivion while the rest of us continue on the Express in the other direction, toward the only viable destination.
You see, David, America was not founded upon deception and lies. It became manifest by the natural consequence of the blood ransom paid by those worthier of higher positions than anyone living today can achieve. Your failure to understand this is the very same reason why you supported a radical subversive alias like Barack Obama.
Obama is the king of liars, and you believed him. Unfortunately, for many, including you, Obama must have been an effective liar. For vintage Americans, like myself, I saw Obama's lies the very moment I witnessed his announcement to run for president on that cold February day in Springfield. I was there. Where were you?
Sorry. The truth hurts. I truly hope you survive the impact. You seem like a decent fellow. However, if you don’t, I can’t feel sorry for you. We tried to tell you the truth about Obama for years and you mocked us, derided us, hated us and called us all kinds of vile names.
So, take your medicine. You deserve far worse than a broken heart over a fraud like Obama. You deserve to have Obama as your only savior…
You, Mr. Brooks, are not only a sap for Obama, you now have to face that you, and your newspaper, were also a tool used for your capacity as a dimwitted medium so lustfully willing to channel the destruction of the most fraudulent politician in world history. You availed yourself to this cause, not because of your affirmation of Obama…but because of your hatred for his predecessor. Now, that hatred has become mete with your desire for it. It has matured into a full recompense for your loyalty in nuturing it. It has become Barack Obama.
Don’t be disappointed that Obama isn’t the person you wanted him to be. Be ashamed that Obama isn’t the man he should have been when called to be so, and that you vigorously supported him in his deception. You allowed him to continue his lies, unabated, unrequited and unchallenged. Well, you wanted him. Now, you can have him.
From that plummeting perspective, being a sap might be something you should think about holding on to...as hard as you can.
Johannson continued, “When I first saw the ‘dots’ it reminded me of screened images used to print photos in newspapers in the 1960s. If you look at it with ‘lazy eyes’, it resembles the outline of a butterfly in flight its body below and the wings extending above."
"Obviously, someone is having fun with this whole birth certificate thing," says Johannson, "the connections between the "X"s placed throughout this document image, these white dots in the shape of a butterfly outline, Obama's birth certificate controversy and now, this book confirming a pre-existing reference to Malcolm X should prompt someone in the media to look into the validity of the information in this image."
It is clear the reference of a butterfly can be attributed to both Obama, historically. However, Johannson is not convinced the forgers of the document image have any specific association with just one concept, Mr. Sims, the video producers, or any specific media associated with such a reference. However, he believes the combination of symbology is intended to be a message by the forger of the image of some sort of connection either political, ideological or personal.
Another source of graphic artifacts may have been used from a popular 1960s news publication, "Muhammed Speaks", which was an NOI newspaper frequently covering stories about Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammed during the height of the Black Nationalist Muslim movement. Archives of the paper are available online.
