From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Obama’s Birth Questions Reinforced By An Unlikely Coincidence

Hawaii Governor, Linda Lingle and Obama’s DHS Secretary, Napolitano, have been acquainted for some time. And, they both had personal access to Obama’s alleged 1961 attending Obstetrician, Dr. Rodney Thomas West before his passing in 2008.

by Pen Johannson

Conspiracy theories are supposed to lose momentum over time, right?

For those seeking understanding about Barack Obama’s origins, hoping to clarify his constitutional eligibility to be President, this is one that seems to be gaining traction the longer it goes on.

Despite the psychotic paroxysms from the left, questions about Obama’s personal demographic origins continue to be asked with renewed enthusiasm by concerned Americans. And, it seems, no matter how hard MSNBC's Chris Matthews tries to preserve his leg tingle for Obama by shouting down his guests for refusing to kiss Obama's garland, the questions will probably only get louder and more intense. Matthews can be found daily spitting all over himself in a desperate lobby for the validity of a Certification Of Live Birth, a document confirmed by the State Of Hawaii as a “secondary form of identification” and in no way representative of proof of natural born citizenship.

Birther persistence is, in part, inspired by panic-stricken Obama addicts like Matthew’s. Their ignorant caterwauling, and attention, only motivates deeper analysis of the constitutional eligibilty issue. Liberals are even going so far as to demand the firing of CNN's Lou Dobbs just for talking about it.

Now, with the recent announcement by representatives of intentions to support a Constitutional Eligibility bill requiring Presidential candidates to submit a birth certificate in future elections, the Obama Birth issue seems to be having tangible impact on the national consciousness.

But, truth seekers are not acting in a vacuum. They are getting help......from Obama.

With internet search engines full of requests for information about Obama’s family, doctors, friends, schoolmates, addresses, and personal records, there is one individual one might want to take a closer look at with regard to any effort that might have been taken to, well……..lets just say…..keep some of Obama’s records secret.


Given the roster of characters involved in such a thing, it’s easy to overlook potentially significant relationships that might otherwise indicate a cooperative element among the characters needed for conspiracy. One relationship that strikes a chord of interest is the one between the Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle and Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano.

One of the odd developments in the saga about Obama’s birth certificate is the decision by Lingle to seal Obama’s birth records with the Hawaii Department of Health. Lingle, a republican, did this despite fervent testimony by Obama staffers and supporters that he is a Natural Born Citizen, and therefore eligible to be president. Lingle’s actions left many Americans suspicious and wondering why, if the documents would exonerate Obama’s Constitutional eligibility, they would need to be sealed from public access.

Now, given the history between Lingle and Napolitano, the decision by Lingle to protect Obama’s personal information may be a little easier to explain.

Napolitano was first elected Governor of Arizona in 2002, then re-elected in 2006, serving for two years before being appointed by Obama as DHS secretary on January 21, 2009. She served as the state’s Attorney General from 1999 to 2002.

Between 2002 and 2009, she traveled on several occasions to Hawaii to attend the USS ARIZONA MEMORIAL CEREMONY with Lingle. Photos of the two together are posted deep in the obscure pages of the Memorial’s website. They are also photographed chumming together at the National Governors Association meetings.

It might also be important to note that the Department of Homeland Security has a history of sending senior members to Hawaii to attend the Asian-Pacific Homeland Security Summit, basically an excuse for spending tax money for DHS personnel vacations.

In February 2006, Napolitano was named by The White House Project as one of eight female politicians who might possibly run for president. In January, 2008, Napolitano endorsed Obama as the Democratic nominee for president. On November 5, 2008, Napolitano was named to the advisory board of the Obama-Biden Transition Project and on December 1, 2008, Obama introduced Napolitano as his nominee for U.S. DHS Secretary.

None of that, however, is pragmatically more important than the effect these opaque issues have on Obama’s image in the clear conscience of history. The facts of his personal datum may never be known for certain and this ambiguity raises suspicion about not only his identity and origins, but his ideology, in the minds of everyone outside of his inner circles of power.

His behavior, coupled with the absence of basic information raises eyebrows of even the most innocent middle Americans. When a teacher in Colorado explained the issue of Obama’s personal records to her class, one third grader asked, “Doesn’t he (Obama), put his name on his papers?”

The teacher replied, “Sweetie, he doesn’t even turn in his papers.” Because of that, Barry gets an “F” on the self administered “Transparency” quiz. So, what does all of this mean?

Without accusations, let's just ask some questions.

Seeing an opportunity to capitalizing on their previous relationship, did Obama appoint Napolitano as the Secretary of Homeland Security, in part, to provide her with the channels to ensure the secrecy of his birth records while maintaining a “manipulatable” relationship with Lingle?

Given their previous relationship, is it possible that Obama might have rewarded Napolitano with the appointment for her efforts in orchestrating, as a part of Obama's overall grand scheme, a plan with Lingle to keep his birth documents concealed under Lingle’s watch?

Upon Obama’s announcement to run for President, did Hawaii Governor, Linda Lingle and now Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano ever discuss how to "fix" Obama’s birth certificate issue sometime after February, 2008?

And, by that relationship, was Napolitano able to “incentivize” Lingle’s cooperation with the Obama administration? The 2009 FY DHS Budget report indicates the State of Hawaii will receive the largest grant in the state’s history for its Department of Health from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The dynamic here is strategically intelligent on the part of the Obama administration because the political right would be less inclined to investigate the acquiescence of a republican Governor in such a scenario.

And, in a somewhat strange twist of coincidence, both women had occasions to personally interact with Dr. Rodney West, M.D. prior to his passing in February, 2008. West is the Obstetrician who has been attributed by some Obama birth truth seekers as the alleged attending physician at Obama’s birth. West served as a volunteer greeter and presenter at the USS Arizona Memorial and was present at the Ceremonies attended by Lingle and Napolitano from 2002 to 2008.

Is it a stretch? Don’t ask us, were just right-wing wackos.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Obama's Words Reveal His Ominous Psychological Underworld

by Pen Johannson

Barack Obama is still suffering the consequences for “acting stupidly” by commenting on the arrest of black Harvard Professor, Henry Louis Gates, at the end of his primetime press conference on July 22nd.

The presser was scheduled, primarily, to address America’s concerns about the Obama administration’s vast Healthcare reform bill. But, instead, we learned some other interesting things about Barack Hussein Obama….America’s first bi-racial, internationalized, globalist president.

Choosing to conveniently ignore the fact that a disproportionate amount of crime is committed by African-American and/or Latinos in communities where they make up the highest percentage of the demographics, and which are communities which must be served by regionally assigned, rather than community based, police agencies, the president said that it is “just a fact" that African-Americans and Latinos are disproportionately stopped by police." And that this was "evidence that race remains a factor in our society."

Well...uh....yes. Perhaps, an analogy about rotten apples might be appropriate at this point.

This was simply an ignorant statement by Obama. His "cherry picking" of statistics on this matter, and his blind partiality for blacks and latinos when they are confronted by white police officers, is a direct consequence of his narrow experience in urban community activism. If he had spent as much time looking at crime statistics in rural areas and suburbs, he would have realized how stupid this statement was.

Aside from any opinions about the appropriateness of Barack Obama’s choice to comment on the benign matter about Gates, his inability to restrain his startling predisposition reveals an ominous underworld of internal substance and motivations regarding race. If it has no other effect, his prejudicial response should have alarmed Vintage America and shaken the foundations of confidence normal people have in the traditional, evenhanded image of the Office of The President.

Many watching the press conference might have concluded that the matter was completely irrelevant to the previous hour during which Obama spoke ineffectively in resolving significant questions about his cataclysmic healthcare reform measure. By his response to Chicago Sun-Times Bureau Chief, Lynn Sweet’s question about Gates’ arrest, Obama actually exposed the preeminent reason for his vigor to effect social change through healthcare reform.

In general, Barack Obama is angry at America. His actions abroad provide adequate insight into his perspective that apologies are required for what he believes are the mistakes of every previous generation of vintage American since America was established by Anglo-Europeans.

Interestingly, Obama seems quite at ease in his role as an apologizer for others when he believes they are at fault, but he seems somewhat impudent when the situation demands recourse from his own error. The Cambridge police department might benefit greatly from an apology by the best apologizer of all, Barack Obama.

In terms of healthcare reform, it should be apparent that Obama resents the quality of life enjoyed by vintage America, in part, as provided by the greatest, and most expensive, healthcare system in the world. Yes, it may be in desperate need of administrative improvement, but even in its current state, it is still the most demanded, best healthcare industry in the world. It employs the best doctors, the most advanced technology and the highest regarded institutions. Obama knows this. He is not stupid. He's simply indignant that some minorities in American society, unfortunately, are excluded for what he believes are reasons of racial demographics, when, in actuality it is because they are unqualified or fail to meet the minimum economic requirements to afford the advanced healthcare offered in the elite sectors of our society. It is the result of the monetization of America's health care industry.

Regardless of the realities of our economy, Obama is possessed by zealotry to redistribute all the components of vintage American life, through the entitlements of healthcare, education and economic preference, to those who he believes are disadvantaged, oppressed and victims of injustice. Victims, like his friend, Dr. Gates.

And, he will attempt to accomplish this by using his speciously endowed power, his ambiguous identity, his ostentatious charm and his secret psychological vendetta to remove monetary and political resources from vintage Americans and reinvest them into demographics he believes are more worthy of his image.

But, the most shortsighted aspect of Obama's ideology comes through his audacious sense of entitlement. He actually believes that affluent members of our society, and medical professionals, have an obligation to provide selective healthcare to minorities.

Obama is proceeding under the resolve that providers must subscribe to his version of entitlement-based healthcare. In the end, this will decimate the quality of the medical profession and utterly drive the best doctors from the industry. No doctor will want to practice medicine in an environment where they are constantly limited in their ability to develop, with their patients, the kind of relationships needed for effective healthcare decisions.

It has become frighteningly obvious that Obama’s agenda, if he succeeds in implementing it, will have apocalyptic ramifications for traditional Americans of vintage heritage.

Vintage America must realize that this man is not intent on changing America for the benefit of all of its citizens. Contrarily, Obama intends to do great harm to the longstanding establishments of traditional America. He is blinded by his personal experience and hatred for the advance citizenry of our nation because he thinks that Vintage America has unfairly assumed jurisdiction over the world's interests. But, what he refuses to accept is that the prosperity of the fittest is a universal truth without regard for his liberal social values.

It is fascinating that Obama has never attempted to conceal his ideology insofar as he has been able to carry out his agenda through traditional political channels and legal shelter. The political climate, and absurd hatred for the previous administration, made his coup that much easier to achieve. And, evidently, we have always had an uneasy suspicion that Obama was a monger of social and community issues related to race, poverty, minorities and entitlement politics to such a degree that the American way of life was at risk.

But, it is only in recent days that we are beginning to see that Obama’s much heralded, inflated personality is beginning to crack and reveal some seething character flaws and a blatantly discriminate mind.

His overt response to a single question about social values, following his mindless rambling around his derisive liberal economic policies, should have told America everything it needs to know about Obama’s authentic motives.

The Mombosan Son has been installed into his place of power. And, now he intends to gain control over the resources, minds and able bodies of the greatest people in human history. He intends to implement a vast policy of indentured servitude designed to evade the conspicuousness of its horror. Although he acts to appease the social values against our historical form of slavery, he is exploiting the shame of those with weakminded contrition and their ignorant hatred for America's societal prerequisites.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Liberal Media Hits Abort Button During Obama's Failed Presser

by Dan Crosby

Displaying his best poker face possible on Tuesday evening during a primetime television broadcast, Barack Obama squandered the better part of an hour-long press conference dancing around, but never actually engaging, every essential, specific question vintage American's have about his apocalyptic health care reform bill.

But, he sure hit a homerun with the proverbial race card at the end.

The evening ended with a question from Lynn Sweet, Bureau Chief of the Chicago Sun Times, which was, in itself, so strangely irrelevant to the previous hour of tribulation over health care reform, that it made the entire press conference seem satirical and meaningless.

But, perhaps distraction was the intention once the liberal media realized how much dumber everyone had become having witnessed Obama's rambling performance up to that point.

So, they hit the most overused liberal abort button ever. Race.

Sweet asked for Obama's perspective on the arrest of black Harvard Professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr., during a response by Cambridge Police to a 9-1-1 call at his residence. Gates was arrested for disorderly conduct after berating Sgt. James Crowley, a white veteran officer of the CPD with 21 years of exemplary service.

According to witnesses, Gates called Crowley a racist and confronted him with racially charged insuations, going so far as to use the term "yo momma" when asked to engage the conversation with officers outside his home during the incident on July 16th, 2009.

In responding to the question, while admitting he was not familiar with the facts, President Obama turned a locally benign incident into a national malignancy by audaciously propping Louis' side in the matter, saying the Cambridge police "acted stupidly" in arresting him at his home.

Living rooms across the nation exploded, "What the hell did he just say?"

But, more importantly, why did he say anything? Obama’s response has prompted millions of Americans to wonder if he suffers from some form of involuntary vocal compulsion.

In recent days, a glaring reality has emerged about America’s first biracial president. The strength of his flamboyant personality can no longer overcome the weakness of his ideologically consumed character.

Yesterday's press conference was a violent confirmation of this fact.

Never, in the history of press conferences, has the introduction of race been so inappropriate and the use of the response "No Comment" been so warranted.

However, even worse is that never in the history of the American presidency has a sitting Chief Executive acted so “stupidly” on a matter of such innocuousness compared to the prevailing subject matter of the evening.

Since Barack Obama became president, there may be debatably legitimate questions remaining about his personal demographics.

But, until now, no one has had an obvious reason to question his character.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Ma'am Boxer's Condescension Reveals Herself, Liberals As The Actual Racists Of Our Time

by Pen Johannson

One foot didn’t fill her big mouth. So, she just had to shove the other one in.

Over the past month, Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has acquired a taste for her own feet. She is one of those rare individuals who, after inserting one in the yammering hole in her face, blindly lusting so much for the appearance of a liberal’s version of diversity, fairness and equality, must shove the other one in as well.

Contrary to the arrogance she used to berate Brigadier General, Michael Walsh, last month, there are some things Boxer has not had to work hard to become. Some things just come easy for the "Ma’am" from California.

Being worthy of the title of “Senator” is not one of them.

Obviously, one of the things Barbara Boxer doesn’t have to work at is offending those who take time from their worthier functions, as members of America’s military and financial sectors, to appear before the meaningless Environment & Public Works committee, over which she presides. Ironically, Boxer tends to assault those who are invited to offer testimony about things she is completely unqualified to make decisions about.

The other thing Boxer is good at is running her mouth without passing the words through her brain first.

In the first instance, on June 16th, Boxer insisted that General Walsh refer to her as “Senator”, rather than the time-honored, militarily correct title of “Ma’am”.

First of all, Boxer revealed her distinct ignorance for the fact that military personnel, and most decent folks who were raised correctly, refer to women who they perceive as an authority as "ma'am". It is an obligatory term of respect, especially from a longstanding, respected military veteran like Walsh.

Secondly, the title of "Senator" was commissioned during the convening of the 7th congress as a way to address members during open debate, not in committee. Boxer needs to bone up on the history of her profession.

Otherwise, there is certainly at least one other gender-specific four-letter title, other than "ma'am", which more accurately resembles Boxer.............if she pleases.

But, the finale’ in Boxer’s foot feast came last week during a meeting with the Black Chamber of Commerce President, Mr. Harry Alford.

Attempting to shove the issue of race into a discussion about energy, Boxer offended Alford, an African American, by suggesting that his position on Cap & Trade was less legitimate on the basis that the NAACP and John Grant, leader of “100 Black Men Of Atlanta”, had different views than his. Obviously Boxer was using race, and more specifically, african american heritage as leverage against Alford's opposition to some of Boxer's liberal views on energy.

Deepening the crevice, Boxer was obstinate, “I am putting in the record a statement from the NAACP.”

And, Mr. Alford’s response was priceless and perfect.

“WHY?” he asked.

Therein lies the jewel.

Indeed. Do tell, Babsy……


What relavence does the NAACP have within a discussion about energy and Cap & Trade?

Apparently, according to Boxer, the National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People suddenly becomes a relevant expert on matters of energy when their views align with Boxer's, while opposing those of another black man who happens to be conservative.

When did the NAACP become an expert in energy? It can’t even function in a role worthy of its acronym, let alone how to find sources of energy.

When did John Grant and the “100 Black Men Of Atlanta” become experts on the issue of Cap & Trade? Why, in a meeting of the Environment And Public Works Committee, did chairma’am Boxer inject a memo, which she specifically attributed to the NAACP, into a discussion about energy with the President of the Black Chamber Of Commerce?

Did she have some noble relevance in defense of an oppressed minority group? Was she citing documents from the NAACP in honor of civil rights or opportunities for blacks?


Unfortunately, there is only one explanation for Boxer’s condescension of Mr. Alford. She was exploiting the demographics of race in order to pander for political support. She was letching skin color shared by members of the NAACP, John Grant and Mr. Alford to prop a liberal psychosis against Alford’s conservative views on energy.

And, she revealed something very ugly and insidious about liberals.

Boxer's condescension of Alford was as shocking as it was perverted. Her depth of arrogant presumption to exercise such thoughtless license, permitted to herself through political party affiliation, was abhorent and repugnant. Her deviance will go on record as the most inappropriate exploitation of the issue of race in congressional history. It was truly despicable.

The most tragic thing, however, is that Boxer has so long been a race mongering degenerate subservient to the politics of demography that she can't even remember when she lost her soul. She didn’t even understand what she had done.

On the contrary, she actually had the audacity to defend her gaff as an elevated attempt to show diversity......

.....about energy?

Barbara Boxer represents an epic debauchery which, at some point, blacks must face about liberalism and the Democrat party of condescension. Blacks must wake up and realize that they are only worth to democrats and liberals as much as their poverty, oppression, helplessness and dependence on entitlement policy allows for the liberal establishment to assume and retain power over their lives. Meeting for the cause of the poor black victim is the essence of liberal identity.

For, when a black man or black woman becomes independent, prosperous and successful they become a threat to the liberal establishment's ability to justify its purpose. Successful blacks are worthless to Boxer's liberal cabal.

Mr. Alford’s knockout punch to Boxer came in a final stanza of his response in which he accurately exposed the true, naked, racist character of Boxer and every liberal who has sold their soul to the god of race politics.

“Senator, we’ve been looking at energy policy since 1996. And, we are referring to the experts. Regardless of their color,” Alford continued, “And, for someone like you to tell me, an African American, college educated, veteran of the United States Army, that I must contend with some other black group, and put aside everything else in here……this has nothing to do with the NAACP, and really has nothing to do with the National Black Chamber of Congress. We are talking ‘energy’. And, that ‘road’ the Chair (Boxer) went down….I think is God awful.”

Alford subsequently appeared on the Dennis Miller radio show during which he summed up his exchange with Boxer, “I was there to talk about Cap & Trade and she wanted to go to ‘colored’ town.”

Finally, an African America speaks the absolute truth revealing the true racists of our time. A prominent, colorless member of American society finally recognizes the insidiousness of race mongering by liberals like Barbara Boxer.

In the end, by her own admission, “working hard” to have a title of “senator”, reveals the utter detestability of allowing a true racist like Boxer to become a leader of anything….let alone something like a congressional committee. In order for a menace like Boxer to have any authority, in the real world, she would have to either commit a crime or engage in immorality to achieve it. Because, no decent, sober person would ever pick someone like her in an election if they were actually afforded the opportunity to become familiar with her true nature.

In this case, she exposed the prevailing liberal view of blacks in America. That they are just one big, victimized black person who needs either pity, condescension or charity.

By this, Boxer has shown that she is a violator of every principle prescribed and recognized by far worthier Vintage Americans before her who have lived authentic lives in the customs of decency and genuine identity.

General Walsh and Harry Alford have seen it first hand. The confrontation with them revealed Boxer’s astonishing imperialistic arrogance…………….and ignorance about her own deficiencies.

Unlike Gen. Walsh and Mr. Alford, Boxer was ensconced into her delusional highness by default election results pandered through a liberal, west coast constituency of reprobates. Her position as a political deviant was achieved only because a deteriorating pool of more qualified humanity who, fearing putrification by association, bore enough wisdom to remain as far away from idiocy, like Boxer’s, as possible, and never serve anywhere near the gutter of Boxer's liberal political ranks. Gutter dwellers like Boxer generally fall into their position simply because better people refuse to take it.

But, the final nail in Boxer's credibility coffin was hammered when Alford referred to her as "ma'am" three times in 15 seconds.

Boxer never even noticed.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

The Newest Race-Mongering Androphobe At MSNBC

by Dan Crosby

For those of us who relish the self destruction liberals suffer from their beleaguered hatred for conservative white men, Rachel Maddow has emerged as a perfect accessory in the MSNBC tool shed.

When Maddow, the newest, though no less incestuously appreciated, misanglyst of the liberal hackwork, took the air last year, it was easy to overlook her ambiguous feminism. She was a rookie intent on merely doing her job.

Though somewhat mannish, despite her elegance upon the precipice of militancy, Maddow presented herself with agile, sometimes adorable, wordsmithery, while nightly draining herself of a mounting agitation against the melanically challenged.

Then, something happened.

Even though she skirts literalism with the best of them, somewhere along the line, Maddow decided to hate two distinct demographic sectors of American society. Whites and Men.

Watching Maddow now leaves one with an unsettling sense that she thinks her broadcast wedge should end each night praising penis haters everywhere. Unfortunately, Maddow has become yet another nail in the discredibility coffin of MSNBC’s nightly festival of hate against all things Vintage American.

In a recent exchange with Patrick Buchanan, a fellow MSNBC contributor appearing on her self titled happy hour, Maddow probed and prodded the evangelist with a series of blatantly race-oriented questions.

In one completely naked, but characteristic question, Maddow asked, “Why do you think it is that out of the 110 supreme court justices we’ve had in this country, 108of them have been white?”

First of all, only a race-mongering liberal would recognize the demographics of America's supreme court history.

In that moment, only an implement like Maddow could violate the contraceptive against corrupted thought to seek the political nugget of racism within the historical judicial service of vintage Americans over the past 250 years.......when America was anglo-europeans.......who happened to be from a region of the world where the sun shines upon the surface of the earth at a more shallow less duration.........than it does where people have developed a higher density of melanin in their a natural defense against ultraviolet their skin a dark complexion......

In liberal-speak, that means America was settled, created and developed by "evil white devils of non-african origin".

The fantasy response from Buchanan would have been to say, "Well, Rachel, its probably because the United States is overtly favorable to whites and rooted in the belief that light skinned people are just better than dark skinned people in every way. DUH!!"

But, he didn't. But, it would have been fun to hear it. And, this is the mantle for liberals for generations before Maddow was shamefully conceived into American generosity.

Instead, Buchanan’s response was poignant, honest, true, factual and real.

“…White men were 100% of the people who wrote the constitution…..and whites were 100% of the people who signed the declaration of independence….”

We will add the "Duh" for Mr. Buchanan.

Maddow looked like a dear in headlights. Running into Buchanan’s brick wall of logic, Maddow zigged with a follow up as her psychosis deepened.

“So, do you think that the reason there have been 108 out of 110 white justices is because they deserve it?”

Again, Buchanan could have answered with devastating logic by simply saying, “Yes.” But, instead he provided a more generous and thoughtful response.

“My argument would be get the finest minds you can get, get real scholars….”

Imagine that.

Choosing the best qualified individuals to serve in places where their decisions actually effect the lives of those they serve is better than choosing individual based on their race.

Maddow isn't even qualified to understand this concept. Her lust for race mongering and harvesting the treasures of the liberal establishment's hatred of white men drives her into an ever vast separation from reality and humanity.

Citing the two mantles of American history upon which our judicial system was constructed, Buchanan should be praised for remembering the essence of what America was intended to be, and for reminding Maddow about what she is causing it to become.

While Buchanan, a conservatively oriented former presidential candidate, presented a sober rendition of the liberal preoccupation with race in each of his answers, Maddow was hell bent on making his pro-anglo responses appear racially insensitive. However, Maddow only managed to confirm the epic suspicions decent Americans have about the corrupted mind of today’s racist liberal. The actual racists of our time.

His point was well made to those who matter. Buchanan was right. Only when America puts away the foolishness of race-based, minority-coddling idiocy in its municipal process will it find sanctuary from the edicts of racism. And, an end to the liberal dissemination of race based politics for its own benefit.

For, it is within the “good intentions” of liberalized measurement by which minorities are discounted, oppressed and forever relegated to a needful regard. Dregs like Maddow are the reason dark skinned people remain in their desolate place. After all, liberals have proven that blacks serve the liberal establishment better when they are victims and slaves than when they are accountable, independent and prosperous.

In reality, liberals, NOT conservatives, are the actual offense to blacks and minorities because only liberals have an self serving interest in keeping them dependent on entitlement and racial politics. Without the insidious sociopolitical value provided for liberals by the disseminations of demography and race, blacks actually have no purpose or value to the liberal establishment. The greatest enemy to a liberal politician is a prosperous, successful, educated, intelligent, decent black man.

Liberals like Maddow hate it when this truth pierces their bleeding heart. And, what’s more, they absolutely disdain it when it is presented to them by a white male, like Mr. Buchanan.

Afterall, white males are the "devils" of humanity. And, without the "evil"ization of white men in America, what do liberals have to propel their desolate ideology? How can they motivate their minions without the false doctrines promoting hate for white men?


Liberals hate the truth from men like Buchanan. They hate it not because they think it’s wrong. They hate it because it is so fundamentally rooted in the truth that it threatens the cognitive structures of dissonance they have strived for so long to erect in convincing themselves of their delusion. The fact that such a devastating testimony comes from a vintage patriarch makes it unbearable for Maddow, and those who have spent their entire lives cultivating a visceral hatred for their caucasian targets.

Maddow probably hates the fact that the emancipation proclamation was created under the administration of a white, republican male. As though slavery and discrimination never existed before America showed up.

Not only is that racist, it’s hateful of America.

Pat Buchanan was honest, thoughtful and correct about the dissonance of liberals and their exploitation of race in this country.

Maddow should be ashamed for allowing her once credible effort at a career descend into such hateful derision.

For all of her fading potential and wonderful naivety, she has become little more than Keith Obermann.....without the vagina of course.

But, then again……she does work at MSNBC.

Friday, July 10, 2009

As Palin Bids A Victorious Adieu, Liberals Continue To Stalk Her

by Dan Crosby

The maverick strikes again. But, what did you expect? Sarah Palin had to “turn her back” while she still remained a pristine political iconoclast. And, in doing so, she revealed the single most effective way to destroy liberals.

Abandon them.

Remove their food. Stop fighting them. Stop paying them. Stop engaging them. Stop making them the reason for your response. Stop driving toward opposition politics. Stop defending yourself against the indefensible degenerate faction of our society.

Just ignore them………………and they will stalk you.

Finally, a political leader made a refreshing decision based on common sense.

Finally, a politician actually stood on principle, other than a sleazy self interested desire to save their own disingenuous, politically motivated ass. Finally, a leader stood up for the interests of vintage Americans and made a statement about what is right and true.

It’s beautifully poetic that she sacrificed her leadership position to do it. And, in her sacrifice, she simultaneously made herself the new standard bearer for human leadership with integrity, while disconnecting herself from every hate-lust fetish the liberal media has for her.

As the pool of American leadership candidacy continues to depreciate to the left, continuously degraded by the incestuous malignancy of the liberal establishment, our society has been, once again, abandoned by another upstanding citizen.

The liberal stalking of Palin and her family continues even as she commits herself to the preservation of community, while at the very same time, giving hatefilled liberals exactly what they caterwauled for since August of last year. A deviant political culture without the contribution of a decent, honorable, attractive, strong, vintage American.

But, then again, that’s the way America is going. All the good ones are leaving while the liberal idiots flood in like blood thirsty parasites on the "road kill" that used to be a viable nation of advanced human citizenry. Sarah Palin’s departure is just another seal upon the liberal doctrine of destruction against Vintage America.

Let’s be clear. Sarah Palin’s decision to discontinue her duties as Governor of Alaska was not based on any lack in her ability as a leader or her opposition, as much as it was based on her own wonderfully soveriegn common sense. It was simple mathematics harmoniously combined with her love of family and authentic traditional community values.

Her rational assessment of the wasted resources required to defend her decency and normalcy against an aberrant society, being driven into destruction by a deranged liberal establishment, left her with a very easy, and simple decision. Sarah Palin was fed up with being the only decent, rationally minded person in the liberal media's macabre asylum.......and attacked for it.

The America liberal media is now slipping all over its own slobber for Obama trying to hyper-inject some corruption scenario about Palin's exit.

No. Sorry, freaks. It’s nothing that fantastic. It’s just a normal person making a normal decision to put the interests of her faith, her family, her country, and her fellow citizens before her own.

Of course it hurts liberals to realize that the person they’ve been attacking for the last 9 months actually exemplifies an exalted standard of humanity. Sarah Palin represents everything most liberals are forced to accept that which they will never be. Especially liberal women. Palin is loyal, educated, successful, intelligent, professionally and domestically skilled, motherly, athletic, courageous, monogomous, rich, decent, practical, traditional, strong, heterosexual and attractive.

Even if she possessed none of the other characteristics, the last two are enough to send liberals into a hissy.

Democrats are at a loss with Palin. But that is what happens when your delusion is imposed upon by a righteous standard after you've sold your soul to your false political gods. When Palin quit, she simply made a statement that most Americans find refreshing and justified.

Oh, and if Alaskans don’t like it, too bad. They should have gotten off their asses and defended her against the deranged liberal hordes when she was fighting for them.

Sarah Palin is so over-qualified to be a politician anywhere, let alone Alaska. When she began to understand the associative properties that rank with likes of degenerates like Al Franken or Barney Frank, one can easily sympathize with her decision to get away from the sewage.

Of course, she has made the right decision not to subject herself, her family and the decent people of vintage America to the horrors of America's desolate, purposeless liberal political consortium. And, specifically, she is right to not allow the use of tax money to continually defend herself against a perverted, liberal rape squad just so she can remain some obscure idea peddler. Applying for a job selling used cars would be a step up compared to the current opportunities afforded by American government. It would come with more honesty, appreciation and purpose.

America should be thanking Sarah Palin for her service and example while she was gracious enough to be here. Her departure is just another indication that all the wrong people are leaving or dying to preserve a failing nation being taken over by the worst of humanity willing to implement the worst of liberal atrocities.

It is important to remember that America was created when the best of humanity was courageous enough to make the right decision and secede from the tyranny of radical government.

Palin's "defection" is also the right choice.

Good for her.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Silly Democrats....The Difference Is Clinton Lied About It

by Danny Crosby

When South Carolina Governor, Mark Sanford took the podium today, he knew he had some explaining to do. And, despite the pressure from historical examples by his liberal counterparts, under similar circumstances, to become an even worse reprobate by lying, Sanford explained with all the honesty and forthright disclosure that one should in his precarious situation.

Perhaps, he even gave us a little too much information. But, we understand why. Its better for him in the long run, and for his place in history, to be honest from the very start.

Given the hordes of perverted liberal stone casters poised at the city gate, Mark Sanford could have turned a personal mistake into a public catastrophe. Instead, he will suffer the private consequences of a lost marriage and, thankfully, only incoherent ridicule from the miscreant, sin-sniffing residue on the left.

The rest of us accept his apology and explanation for whatever responsibility he felt was necessary to own on our behalf.

But, more importantly, as the degenerates of the liberal media celebrate the destruction of Sanford and his family, pathetically using him as a microcosmic target for accusations of hypocrisy against the entire 60 million membership of the Republican Party, convenient dissonance rules the liberal festivities.

Seeking a license for their perversion and chronic lack of morality throughout human history, the liberal establishment is attacking Sanford because of his conservatism, not because of his mistake. Liberals love it when decent people make the occasional moral mistake. It actually makes them feel like valid members of society in spite of their perennial degeneracy. Conservatives may step in holes once in a while, but everone knows that liberals actually live in them.

Now that Sanford has come forth and confessed his mistake, the radical left is trying to draw righteous justification for their bad behavior out of the way Republicans treated the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal of the 1990's to expose Sanford and his party, as hypocrites.

However, liberals fail miserably to realize their sadistic fetish for the destruction of the "Good" political party when they conveniently deny the facts about the two cases. This divergence from reason has become a blueprint for most cases of infidelity and perversion by liberals.

If Democrat politicians spent half as much time solving problems as they did looking for faults in their political opponents, they might actually find themselves worthy of the current position to which they have been elected. Afterall, they love to justify their current endowment of power under the guise they must possess the criteria for the kind of change America wants. But, unfortunately, for the delusional left, the election of democrats was not an affirmation of what they are as much as it was an detraction from what they are not. Democrats were merely the only other option, not the actual solution.

Liberals have a very difficult time understanding that America needs change based on the principles of decency, righteousness, truth and justice...........not just change that comes from "not being George Bush". You actually have to make an affirmative difference to fulfill the credibility of winning an election. Otherwise you are merely a place holder until the right leadership returns home.

First of all, the problem America had with Clinton was not so much the idea of his sexual exploitation of a subordinate.......during business the offices of a municipally funded facility.....universally held as the symbol of American responsibility and leadership.....painted white by our founders for reasons only a liberal could possibly soil. The problem America had with Bill Clinton's adultery with Monica Lewinsky was that the idiot lied about it......multiple times.

Not only did Clinton lie about his affair with Lewinsky to the press, and the American people for 7 months, he carried that lie into the American legal system when he misled a grand jury about the nature of his relationship with Lewinsky.

Clinton was summarily impeached for obstructing justice and lying under oath.......not having an affair.

But, if gutter reasoning is justification for such comparisons, at least Sanford's mistress was attractive.

At least he cheated up.

Conservatives not only give the best, most authentic, confessions, they even make better mistakes that are far closer to "worth it". Not to mention, at least Sanford was decent enough to cheat with an anonymous foreigner on his own her place. Contrarily, liberal politicians can't seem to be perverts anywhere except in places, and during schedules, where American tax money provides them with cover......physically, politically and figuratively.

Yet, liberal idiocy loves to caterwaul about hypocrisy along political lines when a rare indescretion by a Republican raises an infrequent headline. They love to parrot the tired line about the personalized nature of a sexual affair, and how it is something that is no one else's business.

But, the funny thing about the liberal take on Clinton is that if they truly believe that sexual indescretion is harmless, and that it is a personal matter that the public has no right to criticize him for, then why can't they explain why he lied about it?

It was harmless, right? Then why lie about it? Why did Clinton, one of history's most renowned liberals, choose to lie about something that was harmless and nobody else's business?

Enter Mark Sanford.

Welcome to "Confessions By Government Officials 101." Biased members of the liberal media need to take notes, and please try to keep up.

1. Be humble

This requires character, so we can't expect too much from liberals. But, when Sanford stood in front of the American people today, he was humble when he confessed his indescretion. He did not lie about it. He did not posture like a requisite liberal tool would, in front of lights and microphones, with a wagging finger, excoriating the press and public for having the audacity to think he had actually done something wrong. As if we were the idiots.

And, because of this, Mark Sanford will be forgiven for his personal mistake, in the political world. Clinton will not.

2. Tell The Truth.....Duh!

Let's do a comparison, shall we?

We all remember the line that defines Bill Clinton's legacy:

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman.....Ms. Lewinsky."

Well........uh........actually, yes, he did have sexual relations with that woman. Now, let's look at Sanford's coming out with the media.

"I have been unfaithful to my wife....."

Now, which one is the truth?

Bill Clinton went from being merely an idiotic, perhaps more forgivable, adulterer to an evil, cowardly, contriving, condemned liar in the time it took him to vomit 10 pathological words.

Sanford made no such attempt to insult his witnesses. And, history has a short memory when politicians make the right choice to be honest under pressure. We eventually remember the courage it takes to tell the truth when circumstances tell us to lie.

Clinton was a coward. Sanford was not.

3. Don't Make Public Mountains Out Of Private Mole Hills

Bill Clinton forfeited his credibility when he allowed the Lewinsky affair to advance to the next level by lying about it in the public media realm. If he had been as open and truthful as Sanford, he would have never been called before a grand jury, where the stakes are raised and pressure increases to lie again.

The bigger the penalty, the harder it becomes to tell the truth. So, its better to tell the truth when the penalty is the smallest. And, traditionally, it seems conservatives, not liberals, are intelligent enough to know when the penalty for lying is greater than the penalty for their indescretion.

If Mark Sanford was supoened before a grand jury to give account, he would tell the truth because he understands the penalty for telling the truth now is less than the penalty for lying later. Bill Clinton was far too conceited, too liberal, too cowardly, and too stupid to understand this.

Exposed by far more instances of infidelity and illicit sexual behavior, liberals look desperate for justification when they attempt to justify the repulsive behavior of Democrats by pointing at the rare bad decisions of decent Republicans. Especially when they deny their conviction after turning the personal mole hill into a public mountain of legal ramifications because of their dishonesty.

Its not like they are never given the chance to tell the truth.

4. When Throwing Stones, At Least Hit The Correct Target For God's Sake

Its easy to mock Republicans for an occasional slip into the gutter when those heckling them live there. Besides, conservatives understand the human propensity for indescretion in times of passion. But, the difference they have with liberals is that they understand its more honorable to be accused of being a hypocrite by notorious degenerates than to have never been righteous in the first place.

Its easy for liberals to yelp, "Hypocrite!!" because they have never had the responsibility that goes with being decent to begin with.

Here endeth the lesson.

Monday, June 22, 2009

Revenge Of The Mombosan Son: Barack Obama’s Disturbing Liberal Agenda To Impose Covert Reparative Justice Upon Vintage America

by Pen Johannson

"The epic splendor has numbed the minds of the salivating hordes and caused a complete breakdown of reason among the common....."

Prior to the installment of Barack Obama to the office of the U.S. presidency, Vintage American men and women of the Greatest Generation, the courageous survivors of the Great Depression who died and shed blood for America during World Wars I & II, made a commitment to freedom through an understanding and reverence for the actual price of peace and human rights.

They are the authentic descendents of America's creators through whose spirit and courage the founders of our great nation convey the principles of liberty upon which their generational heirs now reside.

Outside of the liberal bastions of America, the children of honor and sacrifice wait patiently for the opportunity to show strength and resolve against the destroyers of their father's nation. The power still resides with them.

And, upon establishing this impenetrable geneological boundary of national identity, they made themselves dangerous to inferior characters, like Barack Obama.
And, by this inferiority, the liberal, angry orphans of American history are obstinately committed to the “remaking of America” in their liberal image, as Obama so stated in his Inaugural Address, through the destruction of its foundational values, the confiscation of its monetary power, and a reinterpretation of permissions to commit constitutionally distorted abjection.

For the first time since he was elected, a national media network actually asked the golden question about Obama's administration. It took 7 months, but on June 23rd, Bill O'reilly finally asked, "What is Obama's end game?"

What is the result of his liberal agenda and this massive expansion of government jurisdiction?

For Vintage America, the answer to this question is simple and plain.

Reparative Justice.

Reparative justice not just for racial oppression, but for many of the identified conditions liberal's have strapped to themselves as they prepare to walk into the crowded political square of America.

There are many "injustices" which Obama, and the liberal establishment seek to correct at that expense of Vintage America. Slavery and racial discrimination are their primary god, but economic classism, social revaluation, monetary redistribution, depreciation of ruralization, minority education, corporate depreciation, property confiscation, community reform, open immigration, and the internationalization of America all fall under the Obama agenda list for receiving his version of Reparative Justice.

And, make no mistake about it. Obama hates Vintage America. Its been 300 years and, by God, Obama and his liberal minions are going to fix America's "brokeness". And, they are going to confiscate the monetary value, subjugate the brilliant minds and enslave the able bodies of Vintage, affluent, decent Americans to fund and resource the brand of way or another.

And, if his agenda fails, he will detonate the rage of the world against America and attempt to destroy it. For, in his mind, if he can't win the world for his father's race, then why should anyone have it?


Just look at the obvious facts first.

Obama was born during a time of great social and economic conflict. His mother was a midwestern, white globalist with vintage American connections. His father was pure African with deep roots in muslim culture.

We have no publicly confirmed documentation about Obama's birthplace. Many say he was born in Hawaii. Still more say he was born in Mombosa, Kenya. But, the facts of this personal datum may never be known for sure. This ambiguity raises suspicion about Obama's identity.

Obama never served in America's interests abroad. He was never a member in any branch of our civil service ranks. And, because of this, one of the most notable problems Vintage America has with Barrack Obama is that there is nothing particularly honorable about the man.

What grand, selfless statement has Obama made in his life demonstrating appreciation for the privileges and opportunities blessed upon him since he was covertly deposited in America?

He possesses little more than education, which he was afforded by the provision of a welcoming society; a society vastly completed and sealed by far worthier path makers of Vintage American pioneerism, established long before Obama’s manifestation to take advantage of it.

His obvious capacity for reason and verbal delivery might serve him well if he were say, the son of Ronald Reagan, or Abraham Lincoln, rather than the socially illegitimate reproductive consequence of a dead-beat African descendent and an indescretionate nubile Anglo mother who, in her broken adolescence, was content to impose the role of primary care provider upon her parents.

But, because of his dark nature, ambiguous origins and black-ops approach in obtaining his current notoriety, we have more questions about Barack Hussein Obama than we have confidence in him.

When asked, vintage Americans say the most prominent characteristic defining Barack Obama is his foreboding “otherness”; An unexplainable consistency of murky intention bathed in the lavishness of cultish influence and overconfident, coercive charm. Many scholarly analysts note that his inflated presentation hides some concealed inadequacy found wandering within his tortured past as a rejected, fatherless, biracial boy in 1960’s America.

And, yet, we have still not answered the essential question about Barack Obama.

Who is he?


From the start, many Americans had, and still have, valid, unanswered questions about Obama’s constitutional eligibility to even hold an elected position in America let alone be president of the United States. But, because of the false perception obscuring America’s political climate, Democrats were able to mount a successful propogandized campaign for support from as many ignorant, racist minorities, pathetically ashamed whites and slews of psychotic, Bush-hating liberals needed to get Obama shoehorned in as the manservant of the liberal establishment.

And still, to date, no documents or accredited testimony has been provided for public consumption regarding Obama’s native born status or his status of immigration after residing in muslim Indonesia and traveling abroad.

Despite the filing of more than 20 lawsuits by viable, respected American citizens questioning Obama’s constitutional eligibility, hoping to determine the facts one way or the other, no challenge has been allowed to go forward by the lascivious liberal court system. All have been dismissed or turned away without so much as a review of the charges or a hearing to determine if the evidence presented is authentic. And, so the liberal empire is allowed to continue on a destructive rampage against Vintage America.

To Vintage Americans, this matter alone is grounds for Obama's disqualification. Perhaps political corruption permits such atrocity in the ranks, but the moral compass of middle America points true. Honesty and disclosure are rightly held as primary characteristics of a qualified leader. By the lack of evidence proving Obama’s full identity, this is obviously a standard the pandering liberal is unable to meet when called to consentual deception through political loyalty.


He may not have the support of humanity's advanced citizenship in America, but he has the support of the rest of the planet. Obama has been able to ride his biracial heritage right into the bowing concensus of an international political campaign. So much so that many forget that he is merely the president of just one of the 286 nations in the world. Many regard Obama as a world-class leader. And, the world has swallowed every single morsel of deception and justification for hating decent people he's dished out to them.

But what about the security and welfare of the actual place he was elected to lead? What about America?

Thankfully, the hard work was already completed in the previous 250 years before Obama cameth. And, more importantly, the most essential decisions made, and actions taken against the international hordes occured in the 8 previous years.

And, though the degenerates of a fawning left love to hold them in contempt, the fact remains that the challenge for national security and the fight against global terrorism remains delegated and ruled by the purveyors of America’s political right. Liberals will never have the privilege of being seen as the strong ones on national security because they simply do not value human life enough to convince anyone that they are actually interested in stopping the murder of Vintage Americans. Quite the opposite, in fact, many argue that Obama unconsciously desires the destruction of his domestic opponents at the hands of terrorists.


Deranged haters of George Bush are content to allow anything else with a pulse to be president, regardless of their character, origins or intent. The malignant sickness of their political fervor drives them to hysterical blindness when their anointed savior opposes those they hate.

This is no more evident than in the facts of Obama's psuedo-professional development. The only qualifying professional title affording Obama with credibility to hold any lower form of service or political office is his work as a community organizer. But, before this, we know very little about this man. And, his personal datum remains concealed like some mysterious secretive oracle, apparently, virginized documents unfit for mortal eyes.

Barack Obama is the embodiment of deception cloaked in a message of personal transparency. His opaque identity reveals little about his true intention while he implements the most aggressive liberal agenda in the history of America. Obama, and the modern liberal establishment are committed to the forcible and political confiscation of power and monetary control over Vintage America. They, themselves, are not even aware of the forces which prod and direct them. Yet, they have embarked on a quest to create the most expensive, most expansive, most intrusive nationalization of governmental control in the history of mankind, at a cost to the people of America, and the free world, of more than 15 Trillion dollars over 10 years.

Of course, Obama has international help against Vintage America. And
, he also has powerfully evil domestic allies.

The American liberal media complex has become the empire of misinformation that voices of conservative wisdom have warned us about for thousands of years. Now combining the theatrical elements of the entertainment industry with news broadcast networks, the liberal media is able to make news....not just report it. Now, the liberal media takes great artistic liberty in implementing its probamic propoganda.

ABC, NBC and CBS have committed themselves as Obama's personal media agencies, to report in the most contrived and favorable terms, anything that Obama does. We are now witnessing the complete ethical and moral breakdown of America's media infrastructure. Objective journalism is dead. And, it was murdered by the ideological interests of the liberal broadcast networks, driven by the financial interests of the liberal establishment.

Simply remaining silent about socialist government intrusion, or disparaging anyone with the courage to challenge the socialist views of their rogue manservant, the America liberal apparatus has helped Obama’s government create a one-way, edict of collectivism that works to restrict, and punitively oppress any point of view that disagrees with them. Especially points of view which promote independence from government and personal accountability.

Exploiting the media, obscuring true identity, character assassination and monetary confiscation through taxation are just some of the methods employed by the panderers of liberal slag to gain power over free people.

Saul Alinsky would be proud of today's democrat party.


Obama, and the strain of our society that supports him, hate Vintage America. They despise America's creators and the heirs of our history for their righteous audacity to create a nation for the people...not the government.

Obama and is minions hate descendents of anglo-european culture. He has contempt for them because he believes the malignment of his father's race throughout history was caused by white people. He secretly blames caucasian humanity for everything from poverty, to slavery, from disease to economic oppression. Obama is the constitute racist of our time.

The new Obama liberal is one who has taken vigorous pains to disguise the intended purpose of America's originators by mystifying their pristine message, mixing lies with half truths, while disseminating the darkest lie that the American Constitution, when held in the benefit of its creators, is a meaningless document haphazardly concocted by racists and expatriated, old white men seeking dominance over the rest of dark skinned humanity.

It cannot be stated to harshly that the liberal's offense upon the memory and honor of Vintage America in this matter, works to discount the priceless bloodshed of our ancestors who gave everything to see us through to peace and endowed to all of us the rights we now enjoy.

However, when the deranged liberal distorts the meaning of the Constitution in service of their destructive cause, then it conveniently becomes the lionized champion of human doctrine and heroism affording the government with power over Vintage America.

The liberal nature is to work toward a delusional end through hate-driven reneging of policy previously constructed on traditional Judeo-Christian principles and conservatism. They are simply motivated to act in accordance with their wretched politics for the benefit, attainment and maintenance of power over the people of Vintage America, who are the advanced citizenry of humanity. And, they seek to accomplish this by infiltrating the weakest points of American society and the exploitation of ignorance, helplessness and indigence.

When America fails, liberals thrive. Because liberals thrive on failure and seek to keep failure alive for their twisted purposes of maintaining poverty, dependence, illness and ignorance on a massive scale. Whether through the exploitation of the sick and impoverished to maintain their voter base, or through criminally minded hypocrisy, the modern liberal hates Vintage America because Vintage America is none of these things. Obama and the liberal establishment hate them because Vintage Americans possess the ransomed blessing endowed by the sacrifice made by others. Liberals hate vintage Americans because they are the possessors of authentic honor, courage, reason, purpose and right.

Vintage American's thrive in faith and divine purpose without the standards of perfection to determine their success. They are generous, loving, gracious, and hopeful of all things good. Liberals are chronically deficient and blameful possessing little tolerance and are quick to show rage and hate. Liberals are the vintage racists of humanity.

Vintage Americans believe in a power greater than themselves. Whether by epiphany or by spiritual affirmation, they understand that there truly is a God of love. And, they seek to know Him more through research of the attainable literature of biblical premise. Liberals hate the idea that anything is a greater power than them. They hate God. They hate his generosity, his selflessness, his intelligence and his mercy for the fallen.

Obama hates the prosperity of Vintage America. Having seen the poverty and debased economic existence of his father's culture, and the culture of his Indonesian schoolmates, the genesis of Obama's hatred for Anglo-american prosperity began when his belief that being poor was normal was destroyed by the reality of American affluence when he came here from abroad as boy.

When Obama witnessed the mansions, the RV's, the resort living, the country club lifestyle of American's, he heard the voices of his past calling to him. "We are poor because they are rich."

"We have nothing because the evil American has taken it from us."

Since then, Obama has fostered the delusion that a redistribution of wealth is a method of bringing about equality within humanity.

Unfortunately for Obama, he has never been confronted with the actual truth about the reasons why rich people are rich, and poor people are poor.

Prosperity is directly related to one's command of life and the humility to accept the failure of who they are. Prosperity is directly related to personal accountability and an embrace of the idea that independence from helplessness is not demographically predetermined.

Tragically, Barack Obama is unable to separate the causes of poverty from his malignant vestiges attributing it to demographic identities. He is deeply deceived. And, he is so deeply vested in the theory of the symbiotic relationship between race and affluence that will never see the truth that a man's worth is determined by what others are willing to pay for it, not what others are forced to pay for it.

And, that's why liberals hate Vintage American prosperity. Vintage America has mastered the truth of personal accountability and independence. And, in doing so, have made themselves valuable to humanity in ways that cause demand for them. Demand for their work. Demand for what they create. Demand for their service. Demand for their ideas. Demand for their innovation. Demand for their brilliance. Demand for their strength.

From the first moment we saw the newly embedded Barrack Hussein Obama, we knew he was trying to get away with something untoward. His elevated demeanor and extravagant language was contrived. His polished delivery was compensation for intrinsic deficiencies of character and a marked absence of honesty. In reality, Barack Obama is a liar, and only interested in preserving his dream of worldwide liberal indoctrination while playing the victim of the “evil” conservative horde.

Obama seeks epic reparative justice for a slew of hardships his father’s race has wallowed in for thousands of years. But, at the end of his historical failure, Obama, and the liberal establishment, will be exposed for the true motivating factor in all of their lusts.

Their grudgeful hate.

They will be forced to accept they will not be permitted to exploit vintage America. Otherwise, they will only be cast into political orphanry with the rest of history's moral indigents.


And, yet, still, against the sky line from Grant Park, as the cold Chicago wind began to freeze Oprah’s tear-ridden cheeks, Obama was frighteningly sincere in his expository glorification of the subject matter he was lying about.

And, after 150 days of the most liberal presidency in American history, in what can only be described as a sign that the apocalypse is upon us, there is little outrage that Obama is selling out America and taking our tax money away, like it was free, to rescue companies we created, and whose only reason for existing is to be rescuers and insurers of us.

In effect, our tax money is being used to pay claim on the loss of a company who has never paid a premium to the American tax payer.

The idea that a person is entitled to something based on their need is a quintessential liberal delusion.


Upon the evidence submitted by America's shortsighted elective consensus, if we are indeed going to establish something as shallow as his demographic profile as a justification for honoring extraordinary achievement and so-called honorability, as opposed to any other reason why we should all passively receive some other black man, we might be more intrigued by the lives of men like Michael Anderson or Dr. Ron McNair, Ph.D., than Barrack Obama.

McNair and Anderson are two black men who gave their lives in the course of service to our nation, as astronauts during the Columbia and Challenger NASA Shuttle missions, respectively. These heroic men serve America far better with their example of leadership, life application and selfless sacrifice than that of coat-tail riding politicians and idea peddlers.

On the disdainful question of race, ironically, and completely contrary to what the mainstream media lusts for you to believe, it remains a teeth-gnashing reality for pro-reparation punditry that Obama’s success is not the result of his black heritage, but rather the result of being rejected by it.

In this case, it seems, the absence of a father actually promoted Obama rather than hindered him.

This is a tough pill to swallow for the radical leftists because it remains the demographic qualities afforded by race that fuel their psychotic lust for weilding the race deck when preaching reparative justice, as well as fueling the 24 hour liberal news cycle.


With regard to the issue of Obama's vital records, containing information about his citizenship, natural born status, immigration status, education, voting records, we are all left stranded. But, what rights to privacy and protection do we have when we’ve been robbed of our eligible leaders, their candidacy tossed aside by the illegal defiance of absurd social engineering?

What right to privacy, through censorship of the public's rightful requests, permits the removal of fundamental power from the hands the American people and validates the ascendency of puppet candidates in the United States?

It is widely held that that the office of the president is greater than the individual who serves in it. Whereas this applies to anyone desiring to become more important than the position, it is, however, possible for an individual to diminish the effectiveness and credibility of the position. When the office is not sought for honorable reasons, and fulfilled as such, then it diminishes the honorability of the office. If a lawbreaker is elected while he conceals his criminality from those who elect him, the election process itself is not held in contempt. The man is. And if he assumes the position for which he was mis-elected, and is allowed to serve as president even after those who support him have knowledge of his wrongdoing, the ramifications of his offense will have tragic consequences to the identity and integrity of national public service policy. Not to mention the credibility of the office of the president is compromised, internationally.

And, so, we find ourselves amidst a leadership conglomeration of the politically and morally desolate. A desolation that has wrought itself so discriminately from the despotic left, that we scarcely recognize any characteristics of decency in their modern purpose. Their derelict offenses on vintage American society are the result of politically driven, hysterical blindness and ideological hate for anything or anyone contending their dissonant ignorance. Liberals in America today don’t have the first clue about how or what to prioritize as a matter of national interests and security. Their servitude to politics over common decency or the alleviation of real suffering will always take precedence upon the liberal docket.

Suddenly, we are imposed upon by their annointed deceiver. The only evidence of his existence and intentions come to us after it has been strained and contrived through a chain of possession and manipulators of interpretation. We only see the shiny, jewel-laden cloak, as the reprobation is subdued, and the vile cause is hastened that they might assume jurisdiction over the minds and bodies of a bowing consensus while destroying those who oppose them.

So, against decent people, Obama now stands as a requisite tool possessing the characteristics endowed to him by invisible forces, constructing doctrinal architecture with insidious justifications, lost in ideology, and implementing damnable, desolate politics which will eventually serve the destruction of everything our father's suffered to realize.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Terrorist Attacks On Obama’s Watch: Two, And Counting

by Pen Johannson

The quantity of terrorist attacks occurring during the first 150 days of the Obama Administration has already exceeded that of the entire 8 years of the previous administration.

The liberal establishment desperately lusts to label the murder of abortionist, George Tiller, an act of terrorism. But, in order to do that, they must embrace the fact that Obama failed to prevent it.

This completely eviscerates the liberal justification for blaming the Bush Administration for promoting conditions in support of terrorism while exposing a telling truth that Obama may indeed be far less capable of protecting Americans than they blindly gave him credit for during the 2008 presidential campaign.

In the most significant indictment of political hypocrisy since Nancy Pelosi accused someone of lying, margin has called on Barack Obama to satisfy the same standards of his much self-heralded fantasy to uphold America's values at the expense of national security. A delusion that he criticizes the Bush Administration for failing to meet.

In concert with one of the most repeated laments of the liberal establishment against Bush's pre-911 responsiveness, it appears Obama also ignored warnings and FBI reports about possible domestic attacks from religionist terrorists. And, with the murderous attacks from two separate terrorists in the past week, Obama has officially failed in the very same ineptitude he, himself, pathetically labeled "Ineffective" anti-terrorism measures he so-called “inherited” from the previous administration. Obama's blame game is catching up with the deficiencies in his own experience with national security while exposing some ominous ideology favoring forces opposing vintage America.

Perhaps one might say he is being reminded about the "lest ye be judged" part of the proverbial biblical commission.

Even Obama's own biased media complex has acknowledged his failure to stop the terrorist attacks of the past week. On June 2, 2009, leftist degenerate, Keith Olbermann, of the state sponsored socialist media network, MSNBC, blathered, “Scott Roeder is the name of the suspected terrorist who was arrested yesterday for assassinating Dr. George Tiller.”

Caterwauling from his probamic entrenchment, Olbermann also concluded a June 1st segment by calling the murder of notorious abortionist, George Tiller, "an act of 'domestic terrorism.' " (MSNBC’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann”, June 1, 2009).

So, even the liberal establishment is calling Tiller’s murder an act of terrorism? Okay, fine.

Let's call Roeder a terrorist.

Therefore, when combining the murder of Tiller by "domestic terrorist", Scott Roeder, with the murder of Little Rock Army Recruiter, William Long, and wounding of Quinton Ezeagwula, by suspected muslim jihadist, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad on June 1st, it brings the number of terrorist attacks during the Obama presidency to two............and counting.

That’s more than the number of attacks occurring during the previous administration.

And, while Obama’s attorney general, Eric Holder, ordered the U.S. Marshal's Protective Service to increase security at abortion clinics, after the murder of Tiller in a church nowhere near his clinic, he made no equal declaration for the protection of Christian establishments, churches or military recruitment offices after these terrorist attacks that actually occurred in these locations.

It appears Obama's politics have blinded him so much that his knee-jerk pander to the liberal establishment has completely overridden his intellectual ability to recognize the actual distinguishing realities of terrorism. In both cases, Christian, military and conservative political icons, three of the major defining characteristics of vintage America, the actual primary targets of terrorism, were ignored by Obama.

This is seen by vintage America as yet another indication of Obama's covert sympathy with radical Islam and his passive complicity with violence committed by fundamentalist muslims.

To add to this evidence, and the tragedy of the events during the past week, Barack Obama gave official statements on both attacks and was gushing with condolences for the Tiller family. Contrarily, however, as of June 3rd, his official statement about the Little Rock Army Recruiting office attack was absent of any condolences to the families of William Long and Quinton Ezeagwula.

The FBI says the attack on the Army Recruiting office was motivated by aversive, radical religious views and violent political ideology. But, then again, so was the attack on Tiller.

So, why is the Obama administration treating the two events so differently?

The longer Barack Obama remains president, the more right Dick Cheney becomes in his excoriation of Obama's complete ineptitude for protecting a nation. And, unfortunately, the more American lives become endangered.

America is less safe from acts of terrorism with Obama as president. Just ask the families of George Tiller, William Long and Quinton Ezeagwula.

Oh, and Keith Olbermann.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Vintage America's Vital Mission: Reject Obama's Reparative Social Agenda

by Dan Crosby

Vintage America would do well to remember the frightening words of Shakespeare, conveyed through the phantom of Hamlet’s father king, as he gives premise to the patriarch's haunting end. Appearing to his heartbroken son in Act 1, in a moment of desperate conveyance, the spirit of the murdered king gives a requiem to his tragic story. In one part, he says,

“If thou didst ever thy dear father love………Now, Hamlet, hear! A serpent stung me; so the whole ear of our nation is, by a forged process of my death, rankly abused; but know, thou noble youth, the serpent that did sting thy father’s life now wears his crown.”

These words, though eloquent and dated, hold relevance for our current time. The question now confronting vintage America resides blatant and derisive upon our minds in a similar manner.

By what “forged process” is Barack Obama attempting to bring about the death of vintage America?

And, now that he has stung the lives of our founding father’s, diminishing their essence and smearing their identity, “so the whole ear of our nation is rankly abused” with the evil lies of his sinister reparative agenda, he now enthrones himself as a victor over the murdered spirits of our founding fathers, and crowns himself a begotten leader among the kingdom built by 43 others far worthier before him.

Obama now benefits from what far better men have built for him. The forerunners of American history are scarred with sacrifice and bear the wounds of injustice wrought with struggle for a higher dimension of liberty.

Ironically, the words of reprobate liberal, Jeanine Garafolo, have come around to more significance than previously credited. This is indeed about a black man in a White House.

And, yes, it is about racism. Racism in reverse.

This is about a black man hating white, vintage America. Rejected by his black heritage, this is about the generational malignancy of resentment held deep in the heart of a bi-racial alien for the 43 uniracial patriarchs who came before him.

And, it is about Obama's covert stratagem for reparative social justice against the very society that relegated him to 43 places later than what he believes should have been his place in American history. This is about a social indigent whose life might well have been recluded to that of a third world existence had it never been for the generosity of his maternal, white grandparents.

This is about a man who believes he has an entitled birthright to delineate, and force upon others, his subjective boundaries of fairness for the citizens of the greatest nation in human history.

And, as the spirit of our murdered father’s depart, their final words shake their descendants to their core, “Adieu………Adieu……….Adieu……remember me.”

Vintage America must remember itself again. It must realize that the purpose for which it was born lies in the directive of our founding fathers and that this has never changed. For, it is this very thing that makes it right, strong and blessed by God. By this, the citizens of vintage America must stand resolute, unified in remembrance, and agreement, of who they are, and from where they were hewn.

Unwavering and destructive upon this pretender, many voices are rising against the surrender of our worth. In remembering the true identity of vintage America, the refusal to remit monetary worth into the hands of a reprobate government is the foundation of the establishment of our free nation. We should remember this cause.

This most valuable vane of American demography, empatriated by generational inheritance, has forgotten that it is the very essence of America and the essential representation of the human species. Vintage America is the advanced citizenry of humanity.

Like Shakespeare’s tragic protagonist, the spirit and honor of Vintage America is motivated directly by the courage of our expatriated founders. The echo of their sacrifice rings sardonically within our reason, conveyed perfectly upon the visceral understanding that we are here because of their vision and bravery. Vintage Americans understand that they are the direct descendents of those origins.

Long ago, America was an idea. That idea became manifest within the minds and spirits of a select few. Throughout the course of 15 generations, those chosen few became the ascendency of preeminence.

Barack Obama is not a member of this generational jurisdiction. His power is assumed by the "forged processes" of political deception and brazened hatred for those he sees as oppressors of his heritage. His "otherness" stings the lives of our vintage pioneers with injustice and criminal exploitation.

Yes, vintage America is under assault. Are there any Hamlets left to avenge the murder of their founding father leaders?

Or, has the incestuous assailant rooted himself so deep in the belief of his lies, that we, ourselves, are persuaded in kind to forget our dying kings?

To be, or not to be? That is the question for Vintage America.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Mancow Waterboarded: Says Anything To Get Liberals To Stop

by Danny Crosby

It took 6 agonizing seconds, but he finally broke.

That’s right. According to the prevailing degeneracy at MSNBC, waterboarding was discovered to be torture when a radio talk show host associated with its competitor, Fox News, was "captured" and subjected to an experimental session of waterboarding until he confessed that it was indeed torture.

The rendition of Enhanced Insinuation Technique used on this hardened lover of torture, has finally proven that even the most stubborn detainee associated with conservatism by liberals, no matter how remotely, will confess to being tortured if you tell him to say it is torture while waterboarding him.

Isn't waterboarding supposed to be ineffective?

Continuing to define itself as the ugly, weird, mean liberal kid in the class of cable news networks, MSNBC, with the help of its angriest reprobate and perpetual ratings subordinate, Keith Olbermann, has made an unprecedented discovery yielded through the use of waterboarding.

Finally, after an endless journey through the nonissues of how best to save America from destruction, Jeff Zucker, President of NBC Universal, (parent company of MSNBC), is able to end his desperate search for exoneration by pinning the credibility of his theory that waterboarding is torture on the authority of, as close as possible to, a pseudo-masochistic, torture lusting neocon he can find.

Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the newest, undebatable authority on America's Clandestine Services:


Not facing certain death, (except for a runny nose), not gasping for air, (aside from some off-air flatulence), and not begging for mercy in the delusional minds of liberals everywhere, Mancow broke under pressure and was willing to say anything MSNBC wanted to hear in order to make the torture stop.

It was absolutely time-killing to watch this brazened attack on the nobility of American values. As the interrogator poured a pitcher of warm water onto the face of this innocent man, liberals everywhere felt the pain of America's founding ancestors.

And, after the 6 seconds during which Mancow was courageously unbound on a conference room table, eyes voluntarily covered, with his friends and a pizza delivery guy working part-time to pay for training as an Emergency Medical Technician attending, it finally did stop.

It was truly the most irrelevant 6 seconds in cable news media history. And, the experiment worked. He confessed.

Imagine that.

Immediately after his narrow escape from a hellish, near death experience, Mancow sat up, unassisted, from the plush oaken in-studio table, which served as the makeshift board upon whence he was tortured, and said he had indeed been tortured.

Then, after a few moments of laughter, all was found to be well with the victim. He was found to be out of danger, completely safe from drowning, and ready for a pastrami sandwich.

And, then he was asked a series of two questions by a trained interrogator doubling as an unidentified man with a microphone, “Do you want medical help?”

Risking another round of torturous water in his sinuses by not answering the way liberals wanted, he replied in an almost questioning, fearful manner, "No, I'm fine?"

And, “We’re you, or were you not, just tortured?”

Sycophants at NBC hallucinated Mancow's desperate reaction as: "Yes, it was torture. I confess. It was torture. Please make it stop. Please."

It was quite a coup. The high value of the information gained from Mancow will help the liberal establishment create policy in the interest of benefitting itself for debates to come. And, Jeff Immelt can close up his incestuous G.E. hack shop and resign comfortably knowing that the greatest question facing mankind has been answered and the evidence to prove it is finally undeniable.

But, then again, Mancow may have confessed that waterboarding is torture because he was waterboarded until he said anything to make it stop, without actually knowing that waterboarding was indeed torture.

But wait. On the other hand, Mancow may have confessed that waterboarding is torture because he actually has knowledge about what its like to be a waterboarded terrorist.

Perhaps they should have waterboarded him one more time to be sure.

Or maybe Jeff Zucker and Jeff Immelt are just a couple of idiots with no experience in modern crisis intelligence gathering methods.

Proclaiming himself an expert on how not to respond to terrorism, Obama, along with his liberal minions in the media, remain completely void of any capacity to prevent it. Throwing adjectives at Islamofascist murderers until they run out of bullets and suicide bombers is an unacceptable strategy in protecting America.

Waterboarding some disc jockey without the weight of an impending mass murder on his mind and then saying it was torture because he says so only proves one thing:

With a freakshow like MSNBC still on the air, it is obvious that the wrong people are dying for America.

And, we might be waterboarding the wrong one's too.