From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Thursday, July 28, 2011


BUTTERFLY EFFECT OR RADICAL LEGACY?: The official document's image posted on the internet by the White House on April 27th, 2011 was personally endorsed by Barack Obama and propped by his fawning media as authentic. However, artifacts discovered in the document image suggest it was intentionally constructed and altered by counterfeiters with definitive, but cryptic, symbology holding simultaneous significance to Obama's identity...ideologically, politically and, perhaps, biologically.

by Dan Crosby
with commentary by Penbrook Johannson
of the The Daily Pen

New York, NY - After Barack Obama posted to the internet a digital image of a document alleged by him, his administration and the American media complex, to be his original, 1961 Standard U.S. "Certificate of Live Birth" on April 27th, 2011, experts soon demonstrated the image to be a forgery. Their conclusions are based on evidence found in both the digital structure and visual appearance of the document image which irrefutably proves the image was assembled using multiple document sources and digital manipulations.

Professional analysis has also proven the document image was produced with a premeditated "multi-level" digital graphic assembly method, often used in engineering drawings and computer aided drafting, in which image remnants and different components of digital graphics were stored as separate sets of data prior to inclusion in the assembly and posting of the image.

Recall, if Obama's real "Certificate of Live Birth" actually exists in its original form, the original paper document would have simply been removed from the 1961 vault file at the Hawaiian Department of Health, where we were told this one originated in this exact form in 1961, then officials would have copied it, not scanned it with a digital imager, then authenticated the copy with an official seal and signatures. It then could have been copied and disseminated to the media and the public. The process is very simple and straight forward.

But, that is not how this document image was produced.

This document image was forged. It was contrived. It was crafted. It was deceptively created. Then it was personally and publicly endorsed by Obama making him politically, criminally and personally liable, ironically, for its lack of legitimacy and deceptive content...much like the man himself.

The analysis has also commanded experts in every related industry, including computer graphics, software engineering, digital imagry and typesetting, to conclude that the document image is in no way a representation of the authentic, original document manually created by the Hawaiian Health Department or any hospital in 1961.

Also found within the image are a series of what initially appeared to be benign artifacts, errors, misspellings, graphic remnants and extraneous markings which have given rise to a range of questions about their intended meaning and purpose with regard to Barack Obama.

Now, however, The Daily Pen has researched powerful evidence suggesting that the document image was intentionally constructed or altered with cryptic symbology and graphic remnants associated with Obama’s past and to, perhaps, either insinuate a theme about the "butterfly effect" of his historical significance or poke fun at the entire 'Birth Certificate' controversy. These symbols are rooted in historical references to African diaspora (disbursement of African races by the Atlantic slave trade), Black Nationalism of the 1960s as well as the CIA.

Along with those mentioned above, these specific anomalies include the layered form of the image rather than a flat image; the presence of what appear to be incorrect spellings, extraneous drawings and words conspicuously hidden in the official Health Department stamp; erroneous hand written numbers and letters within the body of the image; the poorly concealed folding at the left margin and, most recently, the detection of what appear to be remnants of a screened newspaper photo image at the upper margin which appear as a random pattern of white dots.


On December 16, 1964, a man gave a speech before a capacity crowd at the Harvard Law School Forum. In that speech, he said, "When you let yourself be influenced by images created by others, you’ll find that oftentimes the one who creates those images can use them to mislead you and misuse you."

That man's name was Malcolm X.

There is evidence suggesting the misspelling of the word “TXE” in the offical Hawaii Department of Health stamp found on Obama's Certificate of Live Birth is intentional. When compared to other examples of the stamp used by the Hawaiian Department of Health on thousands of other Hawaiian birth documents, this anomaly is not found on any of them. Not one. It is only found on Obama's. Are we to believe that a municipal agency would allow such an error in its official document authentication process?

"In 25 years of working with hundreds of thousands of official documents processed and authenticated by state, county and city agencies, I have never seen a spelling mistake in a pre-molded rubber press (stamp)," says Johannson, "They are checked and rechecked...and then rechecked again, by multiple individuals from the vendor, the agency, the document recipients and the stamp owner. The idea that this is an innocent mistake by the DOH is absolutely ridiculous."

In context, the association of "X" symbology with Barack Obama suggests that the forger is making a general reference that Obama's birth and presidency is an 'abstract' of radical ideology. Whether the association is political, ideological or biological is a matter for debate. The fact that the symbol is even present on such a document is most troubling, however.

In terms of the use of the symbol "X" in reference to Obama's biography, it is important to remember that Obama is the product of radicalism and, thus, that such symbology is not necessarily an indication of linkage to any one individual.

The "X" moniker was an identifier taken by black activist members of the Nation of Islam in the mid 1950s through the 1960s. Many of them changed their birth-given surnames to "X". Such re-identification by members of the radical black liberation movement was an expression of protest against what they believed was the geneological stripping of their rightful "African" names when their enslaved ancestors were forced to take the names of their white slave masters for proprietary purposes.

Malcolm X, as he was later known, was born Malcolm Little in 1925. He was a radical Black Nationalist and Nation of Islam member from the early 1950's until his death in 1965, who, after serving prison time, joined the NOI as one of its most influencial ministers. He changed his surname to "X", after being released from prison, as an expression of his life long hatred for white society which, as he believed, forced his enslaved ancestors to take the illegitimate names of their white slave masters.

In a March 17, 1963 interview on Chicago's "City Desk" television program, Malcolm X said, "...if it doesn't look proper for person who is Chinese to be walking around named Murphy, or Jones or Johnson or Butch or Powell, I think it would be just as improper for a black person, or a so-called negro in this country, as we are taught by the honorable Elijah Muhammed, to walk around with these names. Therefore, he (Muhammed) teaches us that during slavery, the same slave master who owned us put his last name on us to denote that we were his property..."

Since Obama entered public life at the national level, he has often been compared in appearance and ideology to Malcolm X with some conspiracists actually believing Obama is biologically related to him, and that this is the core of Obama's secretive biography that he wants hidden by concealing his records.

To date, no forensic evidence has been presented demonstrating a biological connection between Malcolm X and Barack Obama. However, the two men share a wide range of political philosophies regarding social justice.

With regard to the Certificate, however, Johannson says, “It could just be a case of some overbending wise-guy in the Obama administration paying tribute for Obama. Debates over its meaning really don't matter. The fact that it is present at all is the problem. The only thing we need to understand is that this forger and the people he conspired with are criminals. This is an image of a document meant to represent an official government record in the minds of the American people. The message the forgery conveys is subsequential to any investigation of its authenticity, foremost."

According to an FBI report released in 1983 on Malcolm X and the NOI, X was the subject of surveillance during many of his fiery speeches about Black Nationalism and the rise of Black Islamic faith. He often spoke of African diaspora and mentioned on more than one occasion the concept of the black man's metamorphasis into white society, which was a idea he greatly despised. His rhetoric was so extreme, and his power within the NOI so influencial, it prompted federal authorities to classify his case under a threat of national security.

"The 'X' symbol in the Obama certificate image could mean something much more significant. There is no real way of knowing without confronting Obama, the forger and his horde." says Johannson, "However, is it really far-fetched that a forger would put this symbol in there after all we have come to know and suspect about Obama? One of the definitions of the word abstract is: ‘To extract or select’. It also is synonymous with the words ‘seeded’ and ‘to spawn’."

However, if it is determined that Obama has been lying about his life narrative over the past many years to the American people, the consequences will be dire. Especially, after all that the American people were told about Obama's eligibility and how he met all the requirements to be president, Obama has failed to meet far greater standards than any eligibility mandate. He has failed to meet the standards of authenticity and presidential character. He is not an actual man.

Moreover, if it is finally disclosed that he does indeed have a secret association, in any way, with a radical, like Malcolm X, and he actively schemed to hide this fact for political reasons, this would be an offense far worse than only violating the Constitution. This would be an offense of such magnitude that it would undermine confidence in the political system of world government. This would mean that an elected leader and commander of the most powerful military on the planet hid his secret, ideological, and perhaps biological, allegiance with an individual who fomented the most extreme form of violent, radical, Islamic antagonism. The very scenerio our founder sought to prevent by enacting the eligibility clause of Article 2 of the Constitution.

“Whether these remnants alone indicate a real relationship between Obama and Malcolm X is another story,” says Johannson, “I am simply extricating artifacts and running them through the processes of deduction based on information we have about Obama, factual and theoretical. However, I find it intellectually impossible to imagine that the throng of criminal geniuses who have been working so diligently with this alleged messiah occupying the White House, to protect information about his nefarious origins, would now, suddenly make random and dumb mistakes within a document which they have been able to plan the content of since long before 2008. It’s ridiculous. These are not mistakes.”

Puccini's three-act opera "Madame Butterfly", based on the original short story of the same name written by American writer, John Luther Long, presses on five themes related to Obama's covert life narrative. Nationalism, natal biracialism, colonialization, betrayal and authenticity of identity.

In the story we learn of a twisted and painful tale of interracial love lost to the conflict between cultural ideology and responsibility to duty to one's country while the consequences of bearing a biracial child amid the tempest of these clashing forces results in macrocosmic illegitimacy.

Recall, on Monday, July 25th, World Net Daily published a story indicating that a graphic expert had found what appeared to be extraneous “dots” on the document image of Barack Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth. Please read the story at

However, investigation of the graphic artifacts in association with historical information about Obama reveals they may have been intentionally placed on the image as a covert message about Obama's secretive political, ideological and, perhaps, biological identity.

"First of all," says Johannson, "people should first be concerned with the fact that these anomalies are even present at all, let alone be concerned with any symbolic meaning. Again, this image was disseminated by a man seen by many people, however misguided and deceived they may be, as a confirmation of his legitimacy to be President and an affirmation of their choice to trust him. The guy went on Oprah for god's sake and endorsed this thing...he told the world, 'its all okay, you can trust me'. Now, it turns out that Joe Wilson was the rightest guy in Washington when he called Obama liar during the state of the Union speach. Obama is not just a liar, he is a criminal deceiver."

Johannson continued, "The first question we should have before attempting any interpretation of symbols or secret graphic messages is 'why the hell are they even present in this document to begin with'?"

It is notable that experts have long been convinced the document image is a forgery simply on the merits of the existence of these anomalies. Tying them to significant points of corroboration with facts related to Obama has been less of a concern than simply attempting to authenticate the factual information the Certificate image contains. The bottom line, throughout the entire body of this saga, Obama has been completely uncooperative and outright secretive about his biography for 25 years.

"However," adds Johannson, a software systems engineer, “The ‘dots’, like everything else this covert administration has demonstrated through exploitation of various media are not an accident or a mistake. In fact, they, as well as all the other incongruencies with this document image, are included as an intentional, calculated attempt to send an epic message about the true identity and agenda of Barack Obama while at the same time appeasing his bowing consensus with a shallow pacification.

Obama's most vehement supporters actually hope he is an unconstitutional president. They see the Constitution as the illegitimate entity, not Obama. After all, they see the Constitution as an illegitimate document written by a bunch of white, racist, plantation owning slave masters. The very core culture against which the radical "X" movement of the 60s railed, and preached violent hatred for.

"Why the hell would anyone think they would seek to uphold mandates from such an authority?" asks Johannson, "Obama, like all of his radical influences of the 1960s, hates vintage American culture!"

"I believe the artifacts in this document image are intentional to the extent that even Barack Obama, an offspring of that very 1960s Black Nationalist, anti-White, anti-Christian, diasporic "X"ological culture himself, is aware of their presence, content and methods employed to create them.”

Johannson continued, “When I first saw the ‘dots’ it reminded me of screened images used to print photos in newspapers in the 1960s. If you look at it with ‘lazy eyes’, it resembles the outline of a butterfly in flight its body below and the wings extending above."

Johannson believes there exists a screen image somewhere on the internet which corroborates these white 'dots', which the document creator used as a template. He also believes it probably has some direct reference, or that it was taken from a photo which accompanies a story about someone, or something, connected to Obama's biography for the following reasons:


Staff at the Daily Pen then did a cross reference of the terms "butterfly" and "Malcolm X" and discovered that, in 1996, a children's book author, Ken Sims, produced a coloring book called "Malcolm X The Butterfly". A graphic from the website and information about the book on is shown here:

"Obviously, someone is having fun with this whole birth certificate thing," says Johannson, "the connections between the "X"s placed throughout this document image, these white dots in the shape of a butterfly outline, Obama's birth certificate controversy and now, this book confirming a pre-existing reference to Malcolm X should prompt someone in the media to look into the validity of the information in this image."

Also, shortly after Obama's inauguration in January, 2009, there was posted to a video called "Obama Inauguration Black Butterfly" which is a montage of images of the inauguration accompanied by the song, "Black Butterfly" by Denise Williams. The video can be seen at Also, in December 2009, the TPM Web site published an image of a statue of a young Obama with a butterfly landing on his hand. The piece includes a short story called Obama's Magic Butterfly (see below).

It is clear the reference of a butterfly can be attributed to both Obama, historically. However, Johannson is not convinced the forgers of the document image have any specific association with just one concept, Mr. Sims, the video producers, or any specific media associated with such a reference. However, he believes the combination of symbology is intended to be a message by the forger of the image of some sort of connection either political, ideological or personal.

"It could just be a political message not an indication of some personal relationship between them." says Johannson. "However, forgers will often leave a remnant in their work. Sometimes they leave a 'signature' which only they can identify, or they encrypt a symbol which if discovered might be understood by only a few people but which would have shocking ramifications about the identity of the forger if investigated fully. The problem with the Malcolm X/Obama narrative is that we have theorized about this connection already. Besides, everyone knows Obama looks like Malcolm X so much that he could pass for his son, but how do you prove his parentage without authentic records?"

Another reference to Malcolm X and a butterfly is found in the book "Malcolm X: A Revolutionary Voice", in which Beatrice Gormley quotes X as saying after his viewing of the movie, Gone With The Wind', "I was the only Negro in the theater. When Butterfly McQueen went into her act, I felt like crawling under a rug."

Another source of graphic artifacts may have been used from a popular 1960s news publication, "Muhammed Speaks", which was an NOI newspaper frequently covering stories about Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammed during the height of the Black Nationalist Muslim movement. Archives of the paper are available online.

Another source to review is archives of the Amsterdam News which covered the Black Nationalist movement at the time of Malcolm X's rise to power in the Islamic organization.


On July 20, 2008, writing for ABC's 'Political Punch', Jake Tapper wrote:

"There is a term in chaos theory describing the how infinitesmal variations of the initial condition of a dynamical system may produce large variations in the long term behavior of the system.

Most of us are more familiar with the more common name for it: the butterfly effect.

The butterfly effect was introduced in Ray Bradbury's 1952 short story "A Sound of Thunder," when time travelers change the world beyond measure by accidentally killing a butterfly in prehistoric times.

Similarly, international diplomacy can be impacted by careless or glibly-chosen words. (Cue President Bush's "crusade" remarks.)

Some Democratic allies of Obama's are -- off the record -- concerned that the senator too often doesn't consider the potential butterfly effect of his diction."


Then, on February 24, 2009, Newsweek published a story called 'The Butterfly Brief'.
The story states:

"At the request of top Obama administration officials, the CIA today began producing a daily secret briefing paper on the international economic crisis. At a meeting with reporters at CIA headquarters, the agency's newly confirmed director, Leon Panetta said that the classified daily bulletin, to be called the Economic Intelligence Brief, will report on economic developments in foreign countries that could affect U.S. foreign policy. He said the agency's move to begin producing such a daily briefing—which would parallel other secret daily summaries the U.S. intelligence agencies produce, such as the President's Daily Brief (PDB), which covers international threats and foreign-policy issues—was based on growing concern about how the worldwide economic crisis could produce internal developments in foreign countries, which in turn could have an impact on U.S. foreign-policy decisions."The briefing became known as The Butterfly Brief because of the effect of economic problems in small countries could severly affect the global economy.

"X"s AND "O"s

A search for historical connections between Obama and Malcolm X reveals some interesting associations.

In 1959, founders of the African-American Students Foundation created a scholarship program to enable east Africans to attend universities in the United States. Barack Obama Sr. was one such student who benefitted from the program, which, coincidentally, was created immediately following Kenyan African National Union party representative and Minister of Planning and Development, Tom Mboya's, trip to the United States in April, 1959. Tom Mboya and Barack Obama Sr. were said to be career-long friends until an alleged disagreement on economic policy strained their relationship irreconciliably until Mboya's assassination in 1969.

Serving on the AASF Council, instrumental in Organizing what was known as the "Kenyan Student Air-Lift" in September, 1959, were a host of educators and administrators, one of which was the wife of Dr. Ralph Bunche. Ralphe Bunche was a diplomat and member of the United Nations policy advisement council in the 1950's. He received the Nobel Peace prize in 1950 for his mediation work in Palestine after 1947 and, later, was a major mediation figure in the civil rights activism movement of the 1960's.

Malcolm X and Ralph Bunche are said to have had a long-running, but often contentious, relationship built upon the frame work of the two men's work in civil rights and political activism. In fall of 1963, Bunche, his wife and the entire AASF council were on hand at Harvard University to honor the organization's efforts to "proliferate educational opportunities beyond the confines of colonialized Africa." Both Malcolm X and Barack Obama Sr. were present at this convention. Malcolm X was later a featured speaker at the Harvard Law School forum in December, an event which Obama Sr., according to his memoirs to Mboya, also attended.

Travel accounts and dating of events around Mboya, Obama Sr. and Malcolm X shows there to be obvious opportunities for the three men to know one another and provide assistance in the interest of their respective causes at the time. X travelled to Africa in 1959, prior to the birth of Obama Jr., before Obama Sr. moved to Hawaii to attend school there. Mboya, using his political influence and involvement with the AASF council could have easily arranged for Obama Sr. to be in Hawaii.

Intriguing to the investigation, FBI reports show that Malcolm X also travelled to Seattle, Washington, allegedly to recruit for the Nation of Islam, sometime between January 6 and February 27, of 1959 where he spoke at a church frequented by none other than Obama's grandparents, the Dunhams, and mother-to-be, Ann Dunham. Malcolm X later returned to Seattle sometime in 1960 to establish NOI temple No. 67.

Then, there is the seemingly extraneous, handwritten "X - X" in box number 3 titled by "THIS BIRTH" on the Certificate. This scribble in pencil has been examined and, for the most part, disregarded by the general media as some kind of procedural accounting mark on the Certificate by the Health Department. However, in the context of referring to current symbols, they take on a whole new signifance.

"Well sure," says Johannson, "if a forger or Obama operative wanted to emphasize that the radical "X" ideology had influence with Obama, this would be one obscure, but obvious way of saying it. There are three 'X's in this box! I guess they really want us to know that 'X' has something to do with THIS BIRTH? Just asking the question. Just putting it out there."


Large media organizations have made the mistake of identifying Obama as Malcolm X as well. In late April, as reported by the New York Times on May 10, 2010, the Washington Post Web site published the headline, "Obama Touts Wind Energy in Iowa." Under the headline the, editor published a photo of Malcolm X instead of Obama, claiming it was impossible to tell the difference between the two men.

Also, in August of 1959, Time magazine printed a story about the first Governor of Hawaii, William Quinn, covering among other news the rise of communism and Black Supremacy. Specifically, a story called "Races: The Black Supremacy Movement", which is featured on Columbia University's "Malcolm X Project" website. It contained biograhical information about Malcolm X, and was curiously juxtaposed to the Hawaii Governor's story on page 25.

Johannson continued, “What we are seeing in the fraudulent presidency of Barack Obama is one of a series of capstones to a 60-year chapter of liberal activism and a brazened continuance of evil communist proclivity, under the growing religious tenancy in Islamic fundamentalism. The endgame is to simply undermine the sovereignty of free and prosperous people of western society. What better way to do this than ensconce as your leader, through any means necessary, an individual who now has the power to implement economic justice, through taxation and manipulation of the global monetary system, ruling from a stolen throne, and who is a genealogical representative of the most radical activist in American history, Malcolm X?”

Reading the history of Malcolm X we find it irrefutable that he was enveloped in a deep seated hatred for white society. He was a fanatical racist, like so many of his enemies who opposed him. His entire life was quantified by his life’s early tribulations with racial violence and then, later, his failed attempts to unite America’s black society with messages of violent retribution, reverse segregation and the Islamic faith.

“The guy is quoted to have said, ‘Christianity took me to prison, Islam got me out’,” says Johannson. “X’s father may have been murdered by members of the Klan. If that happened to you, what would your message be to your offspring? Moreover, if you found out that you were one of his offspring…what cause would you take up as your life’s purpose? Let’s just say it would not be to join a country club or a Wall Street bank. Rather, it would more likely be to carry on the legacy of your slain father-leader by becoming an activist, which Obama did, and then assume the pristine throne over your 'white enemy'. Think about it. What greater victory could Malcolm X achieve but to have his own son become president of a society against which he sought justice and reparation for what he perceived to be crimes of the white man against Allah’s black children? The racial hatred exhibited by this strain of individuals is breathtaking."

Johannson believes this is the reason Obama has concealed this information from the public for so long. His campaign would have known that a larger majority of white American society would not have voted for him if they knew of his association with someone like Malcolm X.

"This document image contains the cryptic but archetypical code one would expect to be used by Obama operatives. They are over-educated shills with a blind loyalty to Obama much in the same way Malcolm X described black allegiance to Elijah Muhammed and himself when X was a minister with FOI. For decades, these radical descedents have sought for decades to dilute the truth about their lack of social decency and fallow moral aptitude. Obama’s history, as we know it to be, is infested with radicalism and suspicious associations. Why would it be a shock if we discovered the Malcolm X was a part of that history? For me, I expect to find these things as if they are simply common facts about Obama.”

“In reviewing this document image,” says Johannson, “we must see this entire chapter of American history including Obama's fraudulent presidency, as the epic birth of an agenda of a fanatical establishment and their attempt to implement a radical, if not outright violent, form of economic justice against vintage America. This epic agenda began more than 50 years ago, with the defeat of the Axis powers of Europe and the subsequent and steady rise of communism and radical Muslim influence in the world. Our own prisons have become the reluctant Mosques wherein the defeated and criminal deviant find unity and acceptance among the brotherhood of radical religionists…a religion, unlike any other, which actually advocates the use of violence as a dutiful expression of its faith and outright lies in order to gain advantage of power over those they see as 'infidels'. Everything we now see that Obama's place in American history is based on is about being the capstone of this movement.”

Please note: We are continuing to research this and fill gaps in our information. Thank you for taking time to visit The Daily Pen. If you have any questions leave them in the comments and Dan will get back to you ASAP.

Friday, July 22, 2011


The Elephant in the Oval Office: Obama’s delusional fantasy as a legitimate U.S. president continues to erode as Speaker of the House, John Boehner, walks out of debt talks with the fraudulent office holder. However, the unspoken taboo is that Boehner’s disregard of Obama has nothing to do with ideological differences about how to spend American money and everything to do with the fact that Obama’s claims to power are the greatest felony against our blood-ransomed sovereignty in history.

Commentary by Penbrook Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen

Washington D.C. - John Boehner is finally beginning to understand a bitter but necessary truth. He has been slapped across the face with the same sobering reality which everyone else in America has already known for more than four years. Barack Obama is not eligible to be president, and therefore, he is not qualified to have legitimate debates about the economic challenges faced by the true citizens of this country.

Only a dead person or delusional psychotic would not admit that Barack Obama was ensconced by a bowing liberal consensus for three invalid reasons. One, he is “black” (actually, he is bi-racial, but only his half blackness counts to degenerates on the left). Two, his name is not George Bush, and most importantly, three…no one in this disgraceful government would ever question Obama’s legitimacy to be President because of the first two reasons, even though the constitutional sovereignty they took an oath to protect upon their own induction was being violated and disregarded by this implacable thief.

Under the pathology driving Obama's economic justice agenda, it has now become manifest that a new “law” in America has been declared, without a single merit of standing, which says the Constitution is hereby invalid and, therefore, reparative-based, transient social values and “progressive” ideology are now the hollow standards by which a nation in freefall selects its leadership, regardless of that leadership’s identity, notorious covert history or obvious criminal intentions for the people he serves. Murderers, dictators, rapists, hedonists and bigots are likewise all legitimate according to this generation of liberal Americans. The progressive American electorate really raised the bar for Obama, didn’t they?

Essentially, as Obama emerged into American consciousness, a sick and pathetic liberal establishment, with the help of an illicit media, put forth a sociopathic standard which establishes the right of anyone in the world to be president of the U.S. as long as that candidate fits a specific, “non-white” racial profile, and that they not be an incumbent which liberal bastions self-righteously hate, while being allowed their hypocritical hatred of anyone challenging their ideological lusts. As long as their aspirant fits these binary eligibility requirements, the final decision to allow inferior candidates, and now, apparently, criminals, like Obama, to assume power will never be challenged under the oppressive fear of being disparaged, ironically, by degenerates of even lesser standing than those they condemn. This is a very strange and lascivious dual standard, indeed.

Boehner finds himself amidst his own personal revelation that, unfortunately, there exist among the lame reasons for ensconcing such an inferior applicant as Obama none which include the fact that he was actually constitutionally eligible to even hold the office, as established by the doctrinal mandates of our worthier, original hosts who actually traded their lives and welfare to ensure the rights of electing eligible leaders. This is the very fact which makes Obama such a ridiculous figure. Rather than possessing qualifications of merit upon which he could be validated with standing, he was annointed by an insipid horde for merely not being what they hate. Not exactly the ringing endorsement our founders would have desired for a someone seeking presidential status.

Essentially, when Obama's deranged constituency found itself faced with the undeniable truth that Obama did not qualify under America's requisite rules, realizing they had no extending options, they simply decided that it was the rules which were illegitimate, not the person they sought to exalt. In doing so, they simply violated the covenants of a civil society and, thereby, set an apocalyptic precedent by which America is now vulnerable to invasion from within by foreign influence because the rules now no longer apply to successors of Obama, as well. Or, did they actually believe violating the constitution "just this once" for Obama, would have no consequences for those seeking power later?

The apocalyptic consequence of such a violation, an endorsement of a creature like Obama by ignorant masses, is that America will collapse economically and socially because the deficits upon both stanchions of our society were created by a fraudulent liar to begin with, thereby making the economic conditions and social ills the consequence of that same lie.

Essentially, Boehner is realizing the economic failure of America is a minor consequence when compared to the vast implications of this government’s actual failure to protect the constitutional sovereignty of America…FIRST! More tragically, by allowing Obama to be a pretend president, America received into itself a viral disease of illegitimacy, which has weakened our effectual powers and undermined our self-governing sovereignty. Our economic leverage and moral aptitude is lessened because of Obama’s fake presidency. That’s what happens when you allow yourself to be deceived by such an epic form of identity fraud. Your dissonance leads you to your destruction…as you realize in horror that you are gleeful over your own end.

Unfortunately, Boehner has been forced to realize why it is so critical to uphold the authority and legitimacy of America’s governing powers by verifying and proving the integrity and authenticity of the candidacy of its office holders. Additionally, the speaker is also being forced to deal with the consequences of the failure to ensure that Barack Obama was even legally eligible to bear such power and position, let alone engage legitimate debate about America’s economic challenges.

When an illegitimate leader takes office, it creates a dangerous potential for destructive consequences because accountability becomes strained. There is no greater example of this in human history, except the fall of Adam, than Barack Obama’s usurpation of power over the advanced human citizenry of the United States of America.

If it was found in the beginning that our Constitution prevented legitimacy for honest reasons, then the Constitution should have been addressed through legitimate channels, not disregarded for the sake of some psychotic social indignation. If Obama wanted to become president so bad, he should have first allowed himself to be openly measured against the prescriptions of our founding doctrines with the humility expected of such an office seeker. If found deficient, he had options. Instead, he chose to lie and deceive, and in doing so, allowed at least one innocent man to languish unjustly in prison for five months (only to later provide the alleged documentation originally requested which would have prevented Dr. Lakin's court martial in the first place), and, perhaps caused the deaths of at least two others. Most assuredly, not only has truth and justice been vanguished by Obama, honor has, as well. Now, because of his willful and intentional deception, I fear a righteous wrath has been stored against him and his abettors.

Boehner’s abandonment of Obama is but one of many disseminations to come. As Boehner’s exit shows, reasonable debate no longer has the ability to bring resolution to common problems among our leadership because the initial problem of legitimacy remains unresolved. Obama was allowed to grow into a farcical rendition of illegitimate government wrought with fraudulence and covert criminality, which are the natural consequences of allowing an epic lie to spawn such realities. John Boehner is now witnessing the consequences of the lies about Obama’s true identity, first hand. He is seeing the castration of legislative, judicial and executive power.

Finally, paraphrasing the book of Romans, Paul writes: “…wrath is being revealed against the wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness...their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened...although they claimed to be wise, they became fools...Therefore, God gave them over to shameful lusts and they received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion...furthermore, God then gave them over to a depraved mind to do that which is unseemingly and they became filled with every kind of wickedness and depravity, full of envy, malice, murder and deceit..."

Perhaps the idealism of this place called America exists in a place untouchable by evil renditions of otherness, like Obama. Perhaps the destruction of what we falsely believe is the true America is the only way we will actually find the kingdom upon which freedom and sovereignty was intended to be based…but which, expectedly, could never be defended indefinitely. Do not be troubled by this brothers and sisters. Your eternal purpose was never to be subject to such worldliness.

In that glorious light, we, the founding descendants of this great nation, have nothing to fear in loss of this momentary, transient idea about ‘some ole used to be’. We were intended for something unimaginably better than to be identified with a nation served by the likes of an Obama. In fact, the destruction of a criminal liar like Obama is directly proportional in scope and weight to the size and historical significance of the stage upon which he has trespassed.
Perhaps it’s time we consider the idea of refusing to be afraid. Perhaps it’s time to begin evacuating our fellow nobles, tossing the lamp asunder and locking the door of this absurd theater from the outside.

Let the conflagration sort out Obama’s true identity while it lights the way out of this abyss from afar for the rest of us.

Saturday, July 2, 2011


Congressional records reveal a viral premeditation within the liberal ranks of our government to alter fundamental Constitutional eligibility protections in order to covertly assist an ineligible Obama candidacy and his usurpation of America’s executive power.

by Penbrook Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen

Some diseases are so viral, so invasive, so insidious, so contagious…that they eventually infect what most would believe is the most sanitary part of any body. Even the once honored sovereignty of America’s highest legislative body is now coming under the attack of the disease of multi-culturalism and liberal extremism.

Congressional records show that on eight separate occasions over six years, between 2003 and 2008, legislators attempted to eliminate or change the definition of the “Natural Born” eligibility clause of Article 2 of the Constitution in order to remove restrictions and, thereby, create legal justifications supporting Obama’s unlawful candidacy for President.

We now know what members of congress knew about Obama’s ineligibility, and when they knew it.

In a recently produced documentary, Carl Gallups, a senior pastor at Hickory Hammock Baptist Church for more than two decades with a ten year professional background in law enforcement, presents documented evidence showing that members of congress submitted repetitive, coordinated proposals to alter the 'natural-born' eligibility clause.

Gallups also serves on the board of regents at the University of Mobile and hosts several weekly radio programs in the northwest Florida region.

Gallups’ documentary shows that between June 11, 2003 until Feb. 28, 2008, there were eight attempts to circumvent the Natural-born eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution.

1. On June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Arkansas, introduced House Joint Resolution 59 (HJR 59) which attempted to Constitutionally change the understood historical definition of a ‘natural-born’ eligibility for the U.S. Presidency in order to "permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.” The resolution did not make it to a senate vote at that time.

2. Then, on Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Michigan, introduced HJR67, which would have defined presidential eligibility the same as Snyder's proposal, only the requirement to be a citizen in Conyers’ bill was actually lowered to 20 years, not the more stringent 35 years. Conyers’ bill was also rebuffed prior to an official vote. However, the introduction of two such proposals within a mere four month period reveals that Congressional leadership was conscious of the issue of Presidential eligibility prior to Obama’s candidacy. Whether these acts were put into motion at this time specifically for the benefit of Obama, exclusively, is unclear, but highly suspicious.

3. Then, in an attempt to contend with the obvious attack against the natural born citizenship clause, on Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Oklahoma, introduced Senate Bill 2128 which also failed to hit the eligibility requirement target. It defined a ‘natural-born citizen’ as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States.” This was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution. Exhibiting the same ignorance as other legislators, Nickles failed to acknowledge that the intended purpose of the natural-born eligibility clause was to ensure that the sovereignty, identity and loyalty of a presidential candidate was measured by not only a geographic birth under the protection of the U.S. Constitution but also the possession of natural natal biology afforded by birth to TWO parents who are U.S. citizens at the time of conception AND the preservation of the continuity of that citizenship status until election.

Five months later, on July 27, 2004, Barack Obama delivered his keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention which essentially and suddenly made America aware of him at a national level.

4. Then, just two months later, on Sept. 15, 2004, House Representative Dana Rohrabacher, R-California, submitted HJR 104, which audaciously attempted "to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years." Rohrabacher’s fallow resolution attempted to completely ignore the Constitution’s requirement that a president had to be a natural born citizen. The resolution was rejected on its face.

5. Four months later, on Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers pushed yet another unwanted attempt to change the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ in HJR 02, which was the exact same as Rohrabacher's.

6. Just one month later, on Feb. 1, 2005, Rohrabacher submitted a revised version of her previous resolution in HJR 15 which would require only 20 years of citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

7. Two months later, on April 14, 2005, Snyder resubmitted his bill under another proposal, HJR42, requiring 35 years of U.S. citizenship to be eligible. Interestingly, it has long since been established that Barack Obama’s return to the U.S. from Indonesia took place in approximately 1970-1971. At that time, if Obama had re-naturalized as a U.S. Citizen, this resolution would have made him just eligible in 2005.
Barack Obama announced his candidacy for the U.S. presidency on February 10, 2007.
The Iowa Caucus is held on January 3, 2008.

8. Finally, in Feb. 28, 2008, after seven failures to change the natural-born eligibility requirement, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., attempted to parasite SB 2678 with the Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what "natural-born citizen" includes. Obama and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors of this bill.

Liberal democrats in Congress were in an obvious array to push against this long-standing Constitutional mandate at the time, coincidentally, when the first unnatural born presidential candidate, Barack Obama, began his political career at the national level. Why? Who or what was pulling their strings?

As reported by Bob Unruh of World Net Daily, Gallups’ documentary then demonstrates that “..on April 10, 2008, being "unable to alter or remove" the natural-born eligibility requirement for Barack Obama..", the Senate engaged an active deception by distracting the growing consciousness of Obama’s ineligibility by introducing Senate Resolution 511, which addressed Sen. John McCain's qualifications as a ‘natural-born citizen.’

Overcompensating for their failure to validate Obama, the Senate feigned generosity for McCain in hopes of making his eligibility the target of attention, but not criticism, by declaring him eligible as a “natural born citizen”. Senate leadership desired to avoid making McCain's eligibility the subject of criticism because they knew that if McCain was not eligible, Barack Obama was certainly not eligible. The weight of scrutiny against a worthier McCain would have caused Obama's campaign to fail, politically, if not legally.

However, in what can only be described as complete legislative incompetence, SR511 writers and sponsors specifically stated McCain was eligible because he was "...born in a territory under treaty with the U.S." and, therefore, under the protection of the U.S. Constitution and, most importantly, "because he was the son of TWO U.S. citizen parents." The language of Resolution 511 actually and explicitly commits McCain to presidential eligibility because of the citizenship of his parentage. Both of McCain's parents were U.S. citizens. This is a qualification which Barack Obama does not possess.

Shockingly, Obama voted in favor of Resolution 511 knowing he, himself, was not eligible under these same metrics. Barack Obama voted in favor of a formal resolution stating that a presidential candidate was Constitutionally eligible because the candidate was defined as being ‘natural born’ by the fact that the candidate’s birth was, in fact, to TWO U.S. citizen parent. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen and his mother was only 18 at the time of his birth which disqualified transfer of citizenship if the birth occurred outside the U.S
Obama's qualifications were never reviewed or conferred upon under any similar resolution, nor were his qualifications to be president ever vetted by any federal authority, legislative body or formal inquiry, as were John McCain’s. Not ever.

Unruh continues: “After his election, Gallups points out, Obama held a secret meeting with eight of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court – from which no public information was released. The meeting was held even though there were legal challenges in which Obama was a defendant pending before the Supreme Court at the time. The attorneys for the plaintiffs never were told of the meeting or invited to participate in what critics have described as extrajudicial contact between the court and a defendant.”

Consider this very carefully, sons and daughters of vintage America. Barack Obama, an illegally appointed president under suspicion of violating the U.S. Constitution, actually engaged personal contact with eight sitting supreme court judges who were actively considering pending cases regarding his ineligibility as president, in covert meetings, without the presence of any opposing legal representation. The suspect was allowed to meet alone with very authorities who were presiding in law suits against him, who have the supreme legal power to dismiss, overrule or uphold these lawsuits with binding jurisdictions, without any record of the content or accounting of attendance of those meetings, and without any representation of those filing complaints against him.
This level of corruption and judicial tampering is unprecedented in American history.

Ironically, only Justice Scalia, the longest serving conservatively oriented judge, appointed by Republican President, Ronald Reagan, in 1986, was absent from this secret meeting. Scalia has often been hailed as the "conservative intellectual anchor" of the supreme court. If any one of the nine supreme court justices would have held opposition to Obama's illegal presidency, Scalia would be the first. He was either not allowed in the meeting, or recused himself for reasons of deniability about the subject.

Unruh continues, “WND previously reported on another link between Obama and a campaign to change the constitutional provision. It came from an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then-Sen. Barack Obama. She advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic."

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy was listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cited his membership on the finance committees for both Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., on the corporate website.

The article by Herlihy was available online under law review articles from Kent University when it originally was the subject of reports but later was removed.

Herlihy's published paper reveals that the requirement likely was considered in a negative light by organizations linked to Obama in the months before he announced in 2007 his candidacy for the presidency.

The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the "stupidest provision" in the Constitution, "undecidedly un-American," "blatantly discriminatory" and the "Constitution's worst provision," Herlihy begins in her introduction to the paper titled "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle."

She concludes that the "emotional" reasons to oppose changing the Constitution will prevail over the "rational" reasons demanding a change.

The current American perceptions about the effects of globalization and the misunderstanding about what globalization actually is will result in Americans deciding that naturalized citizens should not be president because this would, in effect, be promoting globalization, Herlihy wrote.

"Although this argument is admittedly circular, because globalization is the thing that makes the need to abolish the requirement more and more persuasive, Americans' subsequent perceptions about globalization are the very things that will prevent Americans from embracing the idea of eliminating the natural born requirement.
"Logical Americans are looking for a reason to ignore the rational reasons promoted by globalization so that they may vote based on their own emotions and instincts," she wrote.

In the body of her argument, Herlihy said the constitutional provision simply is outdated.

"Considering that the Founding Fathers presumably included the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution partly out of fear of foreign subversion, the current stability of the American government and the intense media scrutiny of presidential candidates virtually eliminates the possibility of a 'foreigner' coming to America, becoming a naturalized citizen, generating enough public support to become president, and somehow using the presidency to directly benefit his homeland," she wrote.

"The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is outdated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty," she wrote.

Many of the reasons for keeping the limit, she wrote, "are based primarily on emotion."

Or, Ms. Herlihy, perhaps you must be forced to accept that it was simply a wise measure correctly foreseen as necessary to prevent a lying, criminal usurper, perhaps like Barack Obama, from assuming power over the value, work and lives of the greatest people in world history. There is nothing outdated in any doctrine devised to preserve that.

Is there no limit to the degeneracy of this current political roster into which they will descend in order to acheive their psychotic agenda and control over the blood-ransomed freedom, value and power of the only true decent and prosperous people of humanity?

Wake up, vintage America. Your nation is under attack from within. Liars and deceivers are stealing your daily lives, creeping closer into your personal boundaries and mocking the screaming blood of your pristine warriors.

It is time all who consider themselves decent and sovereign to reject Barack Obama as the criminal usurper that he is.